A new school rugby rule requiring all players get at least 30 minutes game-time is receiving mixed reviews, with one coach giving it a red card.
New Zealand Rugby Union this season implemented a rule variation making it compulsory for all players at school rugby Second XV level and below to receive opportunity to play a minimum half a game of rugby – and made it the responsibility of coaches to enforce.
Tauranga Boys' College head of rugby Rodger McBrydie. Photos: Bruce Barnard.

NZRU says the policy has been introduced as a result of a 2012 survey of 1686 teenagers, which found most players were leaving rugby due to lack of game-time.
Otumoetai College sports co-ordinator Paul Braddock is against the rule-change he says puts player safety in jeopardy and causes headaches and more pressure for coaches.
'We want to regulate and put them [injured players] in at a time that's safe for them,” says Paul, who is concerned players returning from injury may not be physically ready to play the required 30 minutes.
Paul, also an U15 rugby team coach, says Otumoetai College has long been attempting to give each player at least 20 minutes' game-time – but says the compulsory new rule allows students to flaunt the sport's ethos of being rewarded for attending training and playing well.
Some players now only attend one training weekly, knowing they're guaranteed half a game, says Paul.
He feels the principle behind the new rule is sound, but believes it will cause headaches for coaches, as substituting multiple players disrupts a team's dynamic and could jeopardise winning a tight match.
'People have been saying weak players going on in the second half - it weakens the team dramatically.”
Tauranga Boys' College head of rugby Rodger McBrydie believes the rule is a positive change, and is adamant it doesn't remove school rugby's competitive nature.
He says while it was initially thought the replacement of players would dilute competitiveness, the change has received nothing but positive feedback.
Instead of seeking feedback from coaches, Rodger looks to first-hand information from players to back up his stance.
'Talking to the players themselves is where I'm hearing the positive stuff, which is fabulous,” says Rodger.
'I ask the boys to see what their opinion is and more than once it is: ‘it's going really well'. One of the reasons is because they are getting guaranteed half a game.”
What do you think? Comment here.



4 comments
rugby 30 minutes
Posted on 20-06-2014 19:58 | By sangrae
I agree with both coaches but I think Pauls statement that the boys only turn up for one training is a bit weak, what happened to the old scene of to be considered yo must turn up for both trainings to be considered. Come on think outside the square.
rewarding excellence!!!
Posted on 21-06-2014 09:38 | By Sambo Returns
are we to scared to say to our children, in the class room and on the sports field, that they are not good enough, that is why I thought you had a grading system, no wonder we have a generation of children that cannot fail at anything, and consider it their right to achieve, even if they cannot, I do not agree with this new rule,and if anything is only going to create another set off problems, not good enough for 2A play 2B and so on, and enjoy your sport for what it is, not for building up an individuals ego to the detriment of the team, learning to be a good sport and the odd failure puts your sporting/scholarly prowess into perspective.
asleep
Posted on 21-06-2014 09:53 | By Captain Sensible
I'm asleep after watching rugby for 30 seconds. Could never watch it for 30 minutes.
No Train No Game
Posted on 21-06-2014 10:16 | By Pap Local
There definitely needs to be a no train no game policy introduced, some kids in my sons team don't even show for one training per week and still get half a game, that is not in the spirit of the game, Rugby is a team game, players not committing to team trainings only disheartens other team members.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.