Countdown settlement doubted

A preliminary settlement to progress a Countdown supermarket development in Bureta is being questioned by one of the party's representatives.

A Progressive Enterprises spokesperson confirmed to SunLive an agreement has been reached between Countdown, residents and Tauranga City Council to move forward with the 4620m2 supermarket development at the Bureta Trust site, but says nothing has been finalised.

Bureta Trust Bar owner Kevin Fraser continues to hold hope he will be included in the Bureta Countdown development. Photo: Tracy Hardy.

'We can confirm that everything has been settled between the parties and now the court will make its final decision. We aren't able to say anything more at this stage or confirm details as a consent order hasn't been confirmed,” says a Progressive spokesperson.

But Stuart Gooch, a representative for a Vale Street resident affected by the development, questions where the information is coming from as he is still being kept in the dark.

'There has been no official announcement of anything. There has been no notification of it and we haven't received any email, phone call or document,” says Stuart.

Progressive Enterprises Limited's resource consent application to build the $20million supermarket was rejected last year due to noncomplying land use activity, and traffic issues that will be created by the proposed supermarket.

Progressive appealed to the Environment Court with mediation hearings in May, at which time the issues were negotiated and a consent order issued, which meant the appeal did not need to go to a full hearing of the court.

Stuart says to hear about the agreement through the media is surprising but something he fully expected.

'Nothing is surprising when you are dealing with companies.”

When questioned on what grounds the settlement has been agreed upon, the Progressive spokesperson says no comment can be made because the matter is still before the Environment Court.

'We don't want to make it sound like it's a done deal even though everything has been settled. From our point of view we are not expecting it will take much longer.”

Bureta Trust Bar owner Kevin Fraser is also in the dark on the situation remains in a holding pattern despite apparent word of the settlement. In May, Kevin was given notice by Progressive Enterprises to be out of his premises by November.

'I think they have been holding like that for three months now. There has been no more communication,” says Kevin.

Until the final order is issued, Kevin believes his leaseholder rights are stronger than Progressive's ownership because the early termination of his lease had to be for the purpose of redeveloping the land.

He also continues to hold the faintest of hopes the new shops fronting Bureta Road will include a bar and gaming lounge as he has first right of refusal.

'It was always sort of implied that the tenants would be looked out for. It's only in the notice period that they have confirmed there was nothing suitable.

'It's not over until the fat lady sings - so to speak.”

8 comments

Mr Tank

Posted on 06-09-2013 14:20 | By Mr Tank

This all seems very strange - just how have they resolved the traffic issues? Have they negotiated a change in the laws of physics so that all of the shoppers can teleport to the supermarket?


Rastus

Posted on 06-09-2013 15:56 | By rastus

For reasons unknown, no one has been able to satisfactorily tell me how 'overnight' it would seem the hotel and bars, which were built and were owned in 'trust' for the residents of Otumoetai, seemingly got sold to private interests. How a trust can be wound up without the consent of the people who elected the trust board is a mystery - one which I would love to get the answer to - and also what has happened to all the funds resulting from that sale - Now some years later we were told that the supermarket would not go ahead on this site, and then again like magic we are now told it will go ahead - why is it that the people of Otumoetai who originally owned this site are still being kept in the dark - answers from anyone please


its a joke

Posted on 06-09-2013 16:42 | By rotovend

just another disaster and we don't need anymore supermarkets just stupid


Lucky there's an environment court

Posted on 06-09-2013 17:11 | By Phailed1

At least the court can make a decision without council. Personally I'd rather have a supermarket than a bar and liquor outlet. About the traffic, well what doesn't cause traffic? Everything from sportsfields to Baypark to Baycourt cause traffic and council allowed them.


Traffic Issues b dash.

Posted on 06-09-2013 17:16 | By tabatha

When the Trust was built 40 years ago same argument t put forward and it did not occur. My biggest argument is how Mr Gooch can represent a small group of people and be against it when there is another group of people just as close who were not allowed to make submissions for the building. The statement of New World etc nearby are not what some people want. If the appeal fails please reapply and have the right to get submissions from a wider field. Funny how a land agent can speak for people when I thought a lawyer would have been more in keeping. I have nothing against Stuart Gooch just that he was used as a spokes person. Did he consider the people in the TCC Villages nearby? Did he consider people who were unable to make submissions NO.


Yehah

Posted on 06-09-2013 18:27 | By Howard and Mary

Looking forward to having a Countdown in the vicinity. Great asset for the neighbourhood. Don't enjoy New World at all. Must say I don't like the way the media reports things before we the residents are notified and I'm not just talking about this issue. It happens regularly. As for the traffic issues, get over it.


Theodorus

Posted on 06-09-2013 20:24 | By Theodorus

It will be a big win for the Australians if they get away with it!


Hopefull

Posted on 08-09-2013 09:51 | By marcus

Great we are happy about the area gaining what it needs to make it a much better place to live!!!


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.