Pensioner’s premiums hiked after floods

Edgecumbe flooded in April when the town's stop bank burst. Photo: File.

A man whose home was damaged in the Edgecumbe flood is disgusted after being told he has to pay three times his usual insurance premium.

Val Weir's Tawhara Place home is still uninhabitable after it was flooded when the town's stop bank burst in April.

"The water got into the house so everything that came in contact with the water, which was all the furniture, everything low down, had to be binned.

"About 600mm deep in the garage, so everything in there had to be binned. We just managed to rescue clothing and things like that which were above ground."

While insurance claims for his car and contents went without a hitch and his house repairs have been paid for, Mr Weir got a nasty shock when he went to renew his Tower home insurance policy.

"They put my policy up from $1500 last year to $5300 this year."

"I'm highly pissed off, aren't I?"

He says in order to drop his premium he had to increase his excess from $250 to $1000.

He says there had also been a $10,000 flood and landslip excess added on.

"I'm 80 years old, we're on a pension, that's over $100 a week. Where does a pensioner get that money from? Or anybody for that matter?

Val says that after complaining his policy had been dropped to just over $3000, but that was still twice what it had been and what he'd been quoted elsewhere.

"They said, 'oh well the reason it went up was because you lost your no claims bonus'."

He had not heard of anyone else having similar increases and local insurance brokers spoken to by RNZ said it appeared to be an anomaly.

David Sparrow from AMP Whakatāne Insurance Services says the increase did not sound right.

"I find it difficult to believe, in fact it's outstanding. It's incredible.

"Normally a no-claims bonus is maximum of 60 percent of the company premium, that's without earthquake and fire service levies, and GST etc. So if you lost that it still doesn't come to 600 percent does it?"

He says not much had changed with insurance policies for local houses since the floods.

"We've had no changes because of the changes with current clients. In fact we had a house renewed in September and there was no change in premium.

Tower says it had worked with Val to reduce his premium, but the price increase was due to things like his property's risk and the removal of his no-claims discount.

It says there has been no blanket increase for Edgecumbe, however it indicated there could be some prices going up.

"On average, due to higher reinsurance costs and the increased risk, customers in the region could expect prices to increase by around 15 to 30 percent, with customers in areas of significant risk sometimes experiencing larger increases," a spokesperson said.

"In addition there has also been an increase in Fire Service Levy and EQC charges this year.

Tower says it had settled almost half of house claims in Edgecumbe and was on track to get most, including Val, back in their homes by Christmas.

AA insurance says it did not plan on increasing premiums as a direct result of the Edgecumbe flooding, saying it already factored those types of weather events into its policies.

A spokesperson for IAG, which owns NZI, Lumley, State and AMI, says it had no immediate plans to increase costs at this stage.

Insurance Council chief executive Tim Grafton says it was not aware of a blanket insurance premium increase for Edgecumbe residents.

"Each insurer decides their own appetite for risk and how they price that."

- RNZ/ Tom Furley

3 comments

Despicable

Posted on 27-09-2017 12:09 | By overit

Over the top, unfair, and someone elses mistake. Probably the Council.


Change Insurer

Posted on 27-09-2017 15:43 | By MISS ADVENTURE

Would be teh simple answer, shop around mate and stop moaning. Tower will get teh message on that one fast enough.


Surprised have insurance now?

Posted on 27-09-2017 16:35 | By MISS ADVENTURE

Looking at the big picture, the town sits in a hole next to a river (like New Orleans) and so only a matter of time before 'history repeats'. I would suggest that the town relocate to higher ground rather than wait another 10 years to see if teh Council gets around to fixing the stop-bank issues i.e. to low and known prior to be so for some 10 years ...


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.