Harbour Drive to be shared

Tauranga City Council is acting to stop further tussling between dog walkers and cyclists along the scenic pathway of Harbour Drive.

The cyclists were kicked off in July after complaints from pedestrians and dog walkers about their behaviour.

The Harbour Drive pathway will be used by both cyclists and pedestrians.

Council erected signposts stopping cyclists from using the pathway, which were then protested against in July by path users, led by local resident Philip Simpson.

The cyclists are upset over the ban saying there are other shared paths along the harbour front between Chapel Street and Matua that are just as narrow as Harbour Drive's concrete footpath.

But council transportation manager Martin Parkes says it is not the narrowness, but the path's legal status as a 'footpath” that prohibits cyclists.

To allow cyclists to use the pathway the footpath's legal status will need to be amended under council's Traffic and Parking bylaw, which council has agreed to do.

Staff estimate widening and concreting the Harbour Drive path will cost $45,000, with the money coming from the 2014/15 minor works budget. Councillors suggest it can be done cheaper if the extra width is sand and gravel, like other paths about the city.

Resident Arch McTainsh believe council's low level ‘no cycling' signs are illegal and are required to be at least 2metres tall, but have been kept to a low level to protest residents' views.

The Harbour Drive path at 1.944m wide is deemed too narrow to share with cyclists when the recently contracted Matapihi Bridge path built as a shared cycle pedestrian track is about 1.5m wide. The shared Chapel Street causeway is 1.3m wide and 2.2m wide – making Harbour Drive the least restricted of all the paths.

If Harbour Drive remains as is, with the cyclists banned from using the foot path, then the council will have to designate cycle lanes on the road with associated and regulatory markings – which Arch says cannot be achieved without disrupting traffic and current parking habits.

6 comments

Why...

Posted on 18-09-2013 15:45 | By penguin

...do cyclists have to use the walkway, anyway? There is a perfectly good road there which I have ridden on without issues. Methinks this attempt at pleasing everyone has gone too far.


Theodorus

Posted on 18-09-2013 22:39 | By Theodorus

The Harbour Drive water front has been reduced gradually over a number of years.There used to be a wide grassed strip and a large lovely sandy beach! when re developed not so long ego it was left narrowed and a row of rocks put in front of it to protect it from further erosion,But not enough room for a footpath and a cycle track so the put in a concrete path to allow pedestrians and cyclists! Not an ideal situation but it cost less!


What a load of bollicks

Posted on 19-09-2013 08:42 | By ROCCO

Nothing wrong with road in this location for cyclists to ride on.They really are a precious arrogant lot of tossers and if one hits me on a footpath they will know which end is up!!


Cyclists sharing walkways?? !!

Posted on 19-09-2013 10:13 | By dih

Why not, if bells (like helmets) are mandatory for all cyclists. Australian cyclists are by law required to have bells to be rung when approaching pedestrians. Its not hard, we used to have bells on bikes in years gone by!! Bring bells back! Simple really.


Ban dogs and bikes

Posted on 19-09-2013 16:21 | By maildrop

Both are a nuisance. Some dog owners seem to think I have to move for their precious dog! I pay rates, not the dog. Move over or I'll kick it. Bikes on roads, simple as.


Share with Care.

Posted on 20-09-2013 21:56 | By Murray.Guy

Share with care - what's the problem? Groups of pedestrians can be seen using the bitumen, families and prams, joggers and skate boarders, motorised options include mobility scooter and cars. Take it slow. Reduce the speed 30kph. Show some consideration. A few trees would be nice! A smile, a wave, and share.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.