Safety camera trial to detect unsafe mobile phone

File photo.

New Zealand's first ever trial of using safety cameras to better understand the scale of distracted driving gets underway this week.

The six-month Waka Kotahi trial will kick off on Tuesday May 24, using data from safety cameras located at three different locations in Auckland. The same types of cameras are already in use in Australia and the United Kingdom.

The trial will initially capture only mobile phone use, with plans for the detection of people not wearing seatbelts to be enabled later during the trial period.

Director of Land Transport, Kane Patena says driver distraction is a contributing factor in nearly 8 per cent of all crashes where someone is killed, and approximately 90 people a year are killed on our roads because they didn't wear a seatbelt.

"However, the scale of actual distracted driving and seatbelt non-compliance in general is mostly anecdota," says Kane.

'This trial provides an opportunity to accurately measure the scale of mobile phone use and people not wearing seatbelts, as well as test the camera technology, providing useful insight into these road safety issues.

'A key part of Road to Zero, New Zealand's road safety strategy, involves supporting good road user choices, which includes encouraging people to not use their phones while driving and making sure everyone is correctly restrained,” says Kane.

Better evidence of distracted driving can help shape new initiatives to encourage people to make safer choices while driving.

'While no decisions have been made around the future use of this technology, we know we will gain valuable data which may be used to inform future decisions around interventions to address distracted driving and seatbelt non-compliance,” says Kane.

The cameras capture all vehicles moving through the site, detecting drivers whose hands are not both on the steering wheel of the vehicle and potentially otherwise occupied with a mobile phone. The cameras will also detect whether the occupants are wearing a seatbelt.

To protect people's privacy, the face of the driver and any passengers are not included in the image and the number plate of the vehicle will be automatically blurred when an image is captured. Images where no offence is captured are deleted within minutes at the camera site, and those where potential offences are detected are deleted within 48 hours.

Because the trial is focused on gathering information, and there is no Police involvement in the trial, no enforcement action will be taken as a result of the trial. This means no warning letters, infringement notices or any other communication related to any violations detected by the relevant safety cameras will be sent.

A privacy impact assessment on the trial has been carried out, and Waka Kotahi has been working with the Office of the Privacy Commissioner to address all privacy matters.

Findings will be published on the Waka Kotahi website following the trial.

6 comments

What A Waste Of Money.

Posted on 24-05-2022 09:10 | By Yadick

So this system/equipment doesn't detect an offence but rather whether you have one or both hands on the steering wheel? Changing gear in a manual, turning on air-con, scratching my head . . . . . . detecting drivers whose hands are not both on the steering wheel of the vehicle and potentially otherwise occupied with a mobile phone.  You've only got to open your eyes. What about idiots with dogs in the drivers lap standing at the window? Putting makeup on while driving - you can't safely move forward when looking in the rear view mirror for more than a glimpse.


phone

Posted on 24-05-2022 09:24 | By dumbkof2

1st offence instant loss of licence 7 days. 2nd offence instant loss of licence 14 days and 30 demerits. 3rd offence loss of licence 6 months 70 demerit points and impound vehicle 6 months


A perfect example...

Posted on 24-05-2022 11:52 | By morepork

... of a Big Brother surveillance being justified in the name of safety. I agree with Yadick that there could be many perfectly legal and not unsafe reasons for both hands not being on the wheel at some moment. I am not condoning manual use of a cell phone while driving and it SHOULD be illegal (if it isn't already...)


AI Police, Really

Posted on 24-05-2022 17:17 | By RML

I am against txting and phone calls that is not hands free. But AI Police,OMG really,Here we go, But wait, this income cashflow is for the government. What a convenient way of taxing the population.


About time

Posted on 24-05-2022 20:56 | By Honesty is the best Policy

Such a good idea the mount of idoit on there phone is a joke people that sit at light txting is Ridiculous holding up traffic and holding up traffic and some times light go red again and u drivers is a joke be gd to see sjomething done aboy it about time stop the crashes by these idoits bring i on i say and see the idoits off the rd and make fine real big


SORRY, but these

Posted on 24-05-2022 21:28 | By The Caveman

Have been in use in the UK and Aussie for three plus years. A drive around ANY New Zealand city/town for a couple of hours will show basically that 1 in 10/15 drivers have a cellphone in their hands and are using it. Have you been stopped at traffic lights and the car/van/truck in front of you FAILS to move on the GREEN light !!! The DRIVER is either TEXTING or actually conducting a phone conversation !!! SO how many actually DRIVING are doing the SAME !! Drove Transmission Gully last week in Wellington - drivers trying to use their cellphones 1 driver in 5 -- AH, a large section of the TG has NO cellphone reception, but they don't actually know it !! BUGGER - my cellphone is not working !! WHY ????


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.