City hoardings breach bylaws

Political parties and candidates are being forced to remove a number of signs from Tauranga's streets after they breached Tauranga City Council election hoarding bylaws.

Tauranga City Council bylaws officer Paul Mason says eight signs have been removed from state highways, roundabouts and inner city streets due to their 'unsuitable locations”.

The variety of election hoardings along Cameron Road. Photo: Tracy Hardy.

Council officers were alerted to the breaches by complaints from opposing political parties, members of the public and council's own monitoring.

Paul says candidates must remove their own signs if when they are advised of a breach in rules. They can erect them in other locations provided within the rules.

Tauranga MP Simon Bridges has been asked by council to remove 'one or two” of his billboards on Cameron Road, between 7th Avenue and 9th Avenue, which he has now done.

Council are this year trialling two specific locations for election hoardings on Cameron Rd to establish whether they were suitable places for signs to be.

'They prefer for them to be in a couple of specified areas. So we had put them in different places in the median strip and then moved them to where council preferred to have them,” says Simon.

'I don't think we are in breach of anything because either they are allowed there or not, but council wanted them in two areas so we moved them.”

NZ First Tauranga candidate Clayton Mitchell says the party has not been contacted by council over the issue but is aware of some parties breaching the hoarding regulations.

'At least I understand that we haven't because we knew where we could and couldn't [put signs]. There has been a couple [of other parties] that I'm aware of that have been removed,” says Clayton.

'I haven't been contacted and I don't know of any of ours that have asked to be relocated, taken down or moved away.”

Paul says several candidate signs have accidentally been put on residents' fences and candidates were asked to remove them.

Signs have to be moved or removed at the cost of the candidate.

'Candidates have all been proactive about removing hoardings when asked,” says Paul.

Tauranga City Council's Street Use and Public Places Bylaw (clauses 7 and 8) stipulate no sign shall be placed within six metres of an intersection or roundabout, as measured from intersecting road boundaries.

Temporary signs can not be attached in any way to poles, fences, street furniture or other public utilities, or on any public place without the written permission of council.

Signs can be erected in public places, provided they adhere to the Electoral Act 1993 and associated regulations, as well as relevant council rules.

Under the Electoral Act signs can be up to 3m2 and be erected within two months of the general election date. Candidates must ensure signs are not a traffic hazard or danger to public safety. Damaged or defaced signs are the responsibility of the candidate or party.

11 comments

Dislike

Posted on 06-08-2014 14:18 | By trish

I really think these signs are over the top and yes one rule for the public and none for them. I think it makes our city look very untidy.


Signage

Posted on 06-08-2014 15:11 | By sangrae

What is the council thinking of have just driven down Cameron rd what a mess bl---dy election signs every where not even in a tidt manner and a disgrace as well as being a hazard when are they going to be removed would like to think that Clayton has enough nous to get them removed forth with.


Dog break-feast

Posted on 06-08-2014 15:37 | By YOGI BEAR

Signage everywhere, what a colossal mess it is, how can Council claim that there is some sort of plan here when it looks so bad. Perhaps in Council lingo, image, belief it is "good" but actually isn't. Perhaps that explains where much at TCC is a mess, they just don't know and can t see anything for what it is.


Shame

Posted on 06-08-2014 16:33 | By Theway

It is a pity some signs have to be removed, now without their pictures in my face 24/7, I just dont know who to vote for!


good job

Posted on 06-08-2014 17:14 | By whatsinaname

the whole dam lot should be taken down. talk about driver distraction. you shouldn't need signs to get people to vote,


Ugly

Posted on 06-08-2014 17:18 | By panda

These hoardings are an eyesore! They get vandalised and then get strewn all over the place. Just littering up the streets. And, they don't influence my decision anyway. Money could be spent better.


User pays

Posted on 06-08-2014 18:10 | By Johnney

Why don't council lease some space on the bearms and collect a rental. Every little bit will help our debt.


How sad for you..

Posted on 06-08-2014 23:11 | By groutby

That you seem to think so badly about the people (from whichever party) who wish to represent YOU for the next three years, cannot promote themselves for the short regulated time before a General Election...they are only signs, not an instruction in which way to vote..!..if this confuses you, please stay indoors on election day !!


One size fits all

Posted on 07-08-2014 09:49 | By nerak

would be a good start point. All same size, placed at same height. 30 cm x 30 cm would be about right, height above ground 30 cm, no closer than 6 metres to another. Why should we have to put up with huge mug shots in our face on roadsides? 'Mine's bigger than yours'? ‘I got more $$'? But no, pollies would be upset by the notion of regulatory compliance! Signage structure should also be regulated, many are ugly, either designed to hold a tissue in place, or a huge hoarding, (often ineffective/overkill either size) and mostly look like a 5 year old has been given a pile of wood and some nails. The current plethora only makes me dislike some wannabe's even more... like one who did his promised door knock of constituents and came across as extremely arrogant and conceited.


@ ByTheway

Posted on 07-08-2014 10:21 | By The Sage

If you need pictures to tell you who to vote for you need help. Aren't there enough on TV and in the newspapers? These hoardings have never made a blind bit of difference to who I vote for.


Litter

Posted on 07-08-2014 13:07 | By Calm Gully

These signs are an eye-sore. They are littering our streets. The money spent on them could go toward advertising in Weekend Sun or Sunlive, so we have all policies from candidates at hand, the signs don't tell you anything. Please remove them.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.