A new wage option is now on the table after the Minimum Wage Amendment Bill passed its third and final reading in Parliament last night.
Tauranga MP Simon Bridges says employers will have a real incentive to give young people a foothold into work with the passage into law of the starting-out wage.
From May 1, 16-to-19-year-olds can be paid 80 per cent of the minimum wage for six months under the new Minimum Wage Amendment Bill.
The Bill enables the starting-out wage to be an option for employers and employees from May 1.
Simon says it's in everyone's interests to make sure young people are given a helping hand into work.
'Employers should consider using the starting-out wage to give our youngest and most inexperienced workers the break they need to get into the job market, and start building their skills and work experience.
'Young people who don't successfully move into work or who are unemployed for prolonged amounts of time face a real risk of long-term unemployment if no action is taken.”
Under the starting-out wage, eligible 16-to-19-year-olds can be paid 80 per cent of the minimum wage for six months or for as long as they are undertaking recognised industry training of at least 40 credits per year.
The starting-out wage sits alongside other government initiatives aimed at helping more young New Zealanders into work or training, including Work and Income's Job Streams.
When introduced, the starting-out wage will be $11, 80 per cent of the minimum wage.
The minimum wage is currently $13.50 and will rise to $13.75 on April 1.
Three groups will be eligible unless they are training or supervising others:
· 16 and 17-year-olds in their first six months of work with a new employer
· 18 and 19-year-olds who have been paid a benefit for six months or longer, and who have not completed six months of continuous work with any employer since starting on benefit
· 16-to-19-year-old workers in a recognised industry training course involving at least 40 credits a year.



3 comments
When does minimum wage...
Posted on 22-03-2013 12:52 | By ammer01
not mean minimum wage? When Bridges and Co decide to take advantage of youngsters looking for work work. If they are not experienced, pay them the minimum wage! So they work for less than the minimum wage, whose best interests are being catered for by National Govt, business or young people? Maybe we could start getting youngsters to work in sweat shops to produce goods for large corporate businesses (Nike etc), pay them diddlely squat, get them off the dole and claim that they will get experience. Photo opportunity for Bridges in front of the young sweatshop workforce maybe.
helping hand indeed
Posted on 22-03-2013 16:13 | By wazzock
If this is the helping hand (carrot), just wait till Simon pulls out the stick. I guess the helping hand is for the people paying. If you do the same job, you should get the same pay - regardless of age or anything else. Is there anything that Simon Bridges won't be an apologist for?
Ammer
Posted on 22-03-2013 19:37 | By TERMITE
You missed another point to, the benefit paid is to much so little incentive to work anyway, I think that if a kid leaves school then they can not get a benefit until they have already had a job for a minimum of 12 months and at least 20 years old/independant, they can go back home to mum and dad or back to school or to the army but no one gets a benefit if under 20 years old. Now doing that means Mum and Dad will fix junior up with a job rather than the taxpayer having to PC find a job for them when they don't want to work anyway.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.