New Zealand drivers may soon be legally required to give cyclists and other vulnerable road users more space when overtaking, under a proposed rule change released for public consultation by NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi.
The proposal sets a minimum 1m passing gap when travelling at 60km/h or below, and 1.5m when travelling over 60km/h.
“Currently, there’s no minimum distance specified in the rule,” NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA) said in a post on its Facebook page.
“This is unsafe, and it’s led to an inconsistent understanding of what’s a safe passing distance.”
As part of NZTA’s proposal, failure to meet the minimum passing distance would carry an infringement fine of $300 and a maximum court-ordered fine of $1500.
The passing‑gap requirement is one of five rule changes NZTA is consulting on.
The full package includes proposals to:
– Allow children aged 12 and under to ride bicycles on footpaths, a change intended to reflect common practice and improve safety for younger riders.
– Require drivers travelling under 60km/h to give way to buses pulling out from bus stops, addressing long‑standing uncertainty around bus priority.
– Allow e‑scooters to use on‑road cycle lanes, clarifying the legality of a behaviour already widely observed.
– Clarify signage rules for berm parking, making it easier for councils to enforce restrictions around the grassy area between the road and footpath.
Public consultation is open until March 25 and NZTA emphasised that official submissions must be made through the online form on its website.
Comments on social media, including on the agency’s Facebook page where the proposals were recently promoted, cannot be counted as formal feedback, the roading agency said.
Feedback will contribute to the final decisions made by the Minister of Transport.



9 comments
Cuts both ways
Posted on 11-03-2026 07:13 | By RJP
Does that law change also require that cyclists to give motorists a 1 metre gap as well ????
All Very Well
Posted on 11-03-2026 08:06 | By Yadick
To say that the current situation is unsafe is unfair on drivers. What is unsafe is cyclists not using cycles lanes that they cried for and millions was spent to give them, cyclists not using hand signals for turning, (the other hand signals don't count), cyclists breaching speed limits, cyclists weaving thru traffic even when a cycle lane is provided, cyclists not wearing helmets, cyclists without lights or safety fluro vests, cyclists not aware of their surroundings and other road users, cyclists running red lights, give way and stop signs, cyclists not using cycle crossing lights, and/or just smacking the button as they cycle on passed thereby unnecessarily holding up traffic on an unrequired red light.
Just perhaps Policing needs to come down heavily on cyclists and quit blaming motorists for it all.
Don't start me on electric scooters and mobility scooters on the roads . . .
Berm Parking
Posted on 11-03-2026 08:13 | By Yadick
Berm parking should not be allowed as we have to pay out of our own pocket to keep these Council Berms up to spec. It's not allowed in town because it mucks up the berms, so why allow my berm, at my expense, to be turned to ruts of mud.
It also causes cars to partially and sometimes majorly, block and even break footpaths.
cyclist rules
Posted on 11-03-2026 12:38 | By reuben
Then register and give number plates to cyclist .Pay some road tax to pay for the infrastructure .
respect is a two way street it goes both ways .They also should follow all rules not the rules they desire
Shoulder
Posted on 11-03-2026 12:42 | By rogue
So NZTA will also make shoulders and berms wider to also make things safer?
I live in Oropi and cycle daily to Greerton.
No footpath, no cyclelane... and guss what, no shoulder.
Scare myself daily at the moment, look forward to the upgrades
Hmmmm ok then...
Posted on 11-03-2026 13:04 | By katikatinudist
If I'm driving my 2.2 meter wide motorhome and I have to give a 1.5 meter gap if traveling over 60km and there is a double yellow line or a no passing lane marking, then I will be holding up traffic until either the bike moves off the road, goes in a ditch. Or turns.
What Muppet makes these rules.
Adult cyclists on footpaths
Posted on 11-03-2026 14:37 | By BrentD
Does this mean tickets for adult cyclists on footpaths. I just about got knocked over by a cyclist going almost as fast as the traffic. Despite there being a perfectly good and expensive Rate payer funded cycle path right next to the very footpath she was cycling on!
Cyclists bearer
Posted on 11-03-2026 14:45 | By Gutty
Cyclist need to consider other road users as well. Many don't keep left, ride in packs that don't allow cars to pass and are ignorant. If they want to use the roads they need to contribute to there up keep and costs. They can't have there cake and eat it too.
Major flaw
Posted on 11-03-2026 17:11 | By morepork
I always give cyclists as much space as I safely can, I always let buses go if I can safely let them, and I always let in other drivers stuck waiting to get into a traffic stream.
I thought everybody did that.
Isn't it "common sense" ?
To do otherwise is selfish, stupid, or both. (I try to be neither...)
The major flaw in this proposed legislation is that ONLY drivers can be "pinged" for non-compliance, as ONLY drivers have license plates to identify them.
So, a cyclist exhibiting the behaviours so beautifully described by Yadick, above, has immunity and impunity.
You cannot legislate for actions regarding scooters and bicycles unless they are registered and identifiable.
The best you can do is rely on the "common sense" of everyone concerned.
Not a great solution, but no worse than what is being proposed.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.