Tauranga representatives will today cast their vote on the Government's Alcohol Reform Bill that could see the drinking age raised to 20-years-old.
The Alcohol Reform Bill comprises of a three option vote on the drinking age where parliamentarians can choose between increasing the drinking age to 20-years-old; leaving it at 18-years-old; or splitting it.
Crown and Badger manager Richard Two Bears says raising the drinking age will not change the drinking culture of New Zealand.
The split option means the legal drinking age in bars and pubs will remain at 18, but the age will be increased to 20-years-old for those purchasing alcohol at off-licences and supermarkets.
The reform bill also proposes new national maximum trading hours of 7am to 11pm for off licences and 8am to 4am for on licences.
Each MP will cast a conscience vote meaning they are able to independently vote outside of their political party.
Tauranga MP Simon Bridges says he will be voting to raise the drinking age across the board to 20-years-old for two reasons.
'It's overwhelmingly what people in Tauranga tell me they want me to do. I've done surveys, advertising, online polls and it's very clear that is where the mood of Tauranga is.
'Secondly, I sat on the justice select committee that heard the evidence about alcohol law reform. It was very clear to me that all the expert evident supports raising the age.”
While Simon is set on his decision, he does not believe that is the majority opinion among other MPs.
'Is very hard to say what might happen. One of the complexities is that there are three options; I'm told the order in which they're voted on can make a real different to which one wins, so there's a bit of tactics involved.”
The drinking age was lowered from 20-years-old to 18-years-old in 1999 under the National-led government.
Tauranga-based NZ First list MP Brendan Horan would not say which we he was voting today.
'We have a policy in NZ First that we do not give our votes to the media until it has been debated.
'We have a position, but we might change that through debate.”
He says he has no idea which way today's vote will go. He is 'not a great drinker”, and his recent priorities have been with industrial relations, mines and railways.
'I've had my hands full. I haven't really discussed too much about the drinking age.”
Brendan says the idea of a three-way vote will make for an interesting debate.
'There's a lot to debate. You've got the obvious one: I can vote when I'm 18, I should be able to drink when I'm 18.
'But then when we say drink at 18, people get in and they drink when they're 16.”
Crown and Badger manager Richard Two Bears, who is originally from Canada, says he is shocked at the level of binge drinking in New Zealand.
'I have never seen anything like it before.”
He says the drinking age has little impact on the overall culture of drinking in New Zealand and it is the availability of alcohol that needs to be addressed.
'I don't think changing the age will do anything. It is the number of places where people can buy alcohol.
'They need to address how people are drinking. You can't say you can legally go to a bar and drink but you can't go to a liquor store and buy it. You need to look at the number of places selling it.”
The Alcohol Reform Bill was introduced in Parliament in August 2010. Debating will take place later this afternoon and a decision is expected to be made by around 6pm.



9 comments
HABITS
Posted on 30-08-2012 13:05 | By PLONKER
He is right, changing the age does not make a difference, but changing the attitude/education (parenting) will make the difference, particularly important is the example set by parents to their children.
Keep letting kids buy it
Posted on 30-08-2012 13:19 | By South
and see our youth become the same as the British drinking culture in not too many years.
age and maturity
Posted on 30-08-2012 13:19 | By hapukafin
splitting the age just make policing more difficult.why do we have to go down this road here or in any other issue.one would hope a 20 year old would show more sense and maturity.a lot of countries it is 21 for miniumum drinking age
Responsibility
Posted on 30-08-2012 13:42 | By mykgold102
A large part of the problem is people are not held responsible for their actions. We want to enforce strict regulations and severe penalties on the businesses that serve liquor but not the individual. It is time people were held accountable for their actions. The right to consume comes with a responsibility regardless of what the age limit is. If someone can't live up to the responsibility then they should suffer the consequences be it a fine for public intoxication or a night in the drunk tank.
mykgold102
Posted on 30-08-2012 17:28 | By Butch
Hell there will be anarchy, you cannot go around punishing the precosious brats like that, a good smack in the ear or a kick in the butt will suffice.
about time
Posted on 30-08-2012 17:43 | By Alanah
That makes more sense then putting up prices which punishes everyone and it maybe that a couple can only afford one bottle of wine a week at the moment for there relax of the week - how cruel to take that away from them
20
Posted on 31-08-2012 08:37 | By Capt_Kaveman
why it was not moved cose to many MPs are a bunch of drunks as well, all this crap of drugs testing yet the main one is let free
Enemies of society
Posted on 31-08-2012 09:04 | By SpeakUp
All the bulls!titians who voted 18 ignore the will of the vast majority of citizens and are enemies of our society. They don't deserve to be in office. They are fraudsters of democracy by way of their total disregard of reason and reason of the state. They are responsible for the demise of consensus. They are nemeses of social order, public health and civilisation. With the lousy examples set in the beehive it is no wonder that accountability of which mykgold102 commented is devoid in this culture.
mygold has it right
Posted on 04-09-2012 09:33 | By The Tomahawk Kid
@mykgold102 BRILLIANT - at LAST somebody talking some sense on the issue. They dont need to tinker and mess around with the age limit - simply enforce the laws that exist now (and that have existed for decades). Anybody drunk and disorderly in a public place should be punished in respect of the current laws. There are plenty of people who get drunk and NOT disorderly - and that is THEIR CHOICE, and nobody elses. The authorities are failing to enforce the laws as they stand NOW - what is fiddling with the laws going to do if they dont uphold them. This argument is pointless
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.