Three Waters: Hamilton Mayor plans Tauranga meet

Tauranga City Council commission chair Anne Tolley confirms a meeting plan is in progress. Photo. John Borren.

Tauranga City Council is set to meet with Hamilton City Council, whose Mayor is calling for the government to reconsider Three Waters Reform proposals, with the discussion of smaller regional water organisations potentially on the cards.

Hamilton Mayor Paula Southgate says she does not believe the current model proposal is in the best interests of the Waikato city.

Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta confirmed in November last year that the Government was pushing through with Three Waters Reform – despite numerous objections from councils across New Zealand.

Mayor Southgate believes there is scope for smaller organisations, with a Waikato-Bay of Plenty entity possible.

At present, both Hamilton and Tauranga would fall into Entity B of the four region system, along with the Western Bay of Plenty and 19 other councils.

Hamilton City Council approved a report to be submitted to the Government-appointed Three Waters Working Group - established to help settle the considerable issues involved with the implementation of Three Waters.

The submission, approved at a Hamilton City Council meeting this week, will request changes, and other improvements related to governance and accountability of the new structure. Work on the specifics of this submission document is still ongoing.

'It's about working with those councils with common interests while still getting benefits of scale,” says Southgate.

'The model as it is proposed doesn't cut it for me and doesn't cut it for other Councillors either. But we will still be part of the process and we will still keep pushing for change in the best interests of our city.”

Southgate has praised the Government for taking on some early feedback regarding the reforms. However, she feels alternative options need to be worked on now.

'We need to see a clear pathway for how water reform is going to support the massive need for infrastructure spending in high-growth councils like ours,” she says.

'The reality is we have a huge wave of water infrastructure and other infrastructure costs coming to simply keep up with growth. Whatever structure is put in place has to reflect that reality, otherwise we are not going to get the benefits for our city that we need.”

She says a meeting with Tauranga Commission Chair Anne Tolley is on the cards to discuss the proposal. Tolley has confirmed to SunLive that arrangements are being progressed for a meeting but there is no timeframe as to when this might take place.

She also makes it clear the matter has yet to be considered by Council and therefore no decisions have been made.

Tolley has previously spoken about the Tauranga community's rejection of the reforms and a need for clearer information about the current proposal.

Hamilton's Mayor also intends to write to all other Waikato and Bay of Plenty Mayors to discuss the merits of such an entity.

The three Waters Working Group will report back their findings, including any submission from Hamilton City Council, to Government in March.

10 comments

3 waters

Posted on 05-02-2022 09:54 | By dumbkof2

tolly sand mahuta have already decided that this is going to happen. you and i will have no say in the matter


Conflict

Posted on 05-02-2022 11:08 | By Johnney

Tolley should step aside from any discussion or decisions about 3 waters. She is employed by this government.


That sounds almost sensible,

Posted on 05-02-2022 11:13 | By FRANKS

provided the dual governance iwi control is removed.


@Dumbkof2 and Johnney

Posted on 05-02-2022 13:33 | By morepork

You are both right. But your posts made me wonder WHY there is such skepticism when a meeting to discuss the matter is announced. Surely that should be cause for optimism? But it never is, is it? D'j'a think it is because of a past track record which shows that The Commissioner and her Chiefs really have no interest in dissent; The Boss calls the shots and the Boss has decided that He Puapua WILL progress with 3 waters as just one prong of it. The exercise then becomes "go through the motions" so they can see we are open to discussion, but don't worry; we'll do whatever it takes (midnight Law Changes, closed door secret meetings, whatever...) and we'll get what we want. They have to be taught that Democracy is done; the victorious tribe rules. And that's us...


Governance model unacceptable

Posted on 05-02-2022 14:10 | By Kancho

I strongly object to the governance being selected on a race basis, that 50 percent is iwi selected is racist. Governance should be purely on merit, on knowledge experience and doesn't matter what race or sex. Water is God given so doesn't belong to anyone. If we all pay for water treatment and delivery it's not any more anything to do with race. Local arrangements for water way need help to finance and organise and government can legislate and finance with our taxpayers money. Taking over and taking assets and dictating to local people is undemocratic and unnecessary. Councils are restricted by government on the of level of borrowing so assist locals by freeing up loans and grants. Some areas are blessed with good plentiful water so no government interference is welcome. Others may need assistance from taxpayers


Got it wrong

Posted on 05-02-2022 20:03 | By Informed

Given Tolley has made multiple clear statements against the current form of the reforms (its even in this article). It’s really odd that the comments seem to act like she come out for it. PS she’s a long term ex National MP and National Councillor, so zero love for Labour.


Tolley designed 3 waters

Posted on 06-02-2022 10:41 | By an_alias

Why would you come and discuss 3 waters with the person who designed it ? Makes no sense. We have no say.


No to 3 waters

Posted on 06-02-2022 13:15 | By Kancho

The Governance model is wrong and anti democratic . Selection on the basis of race rather than merit , expertise , and knowledge is wrong. Remember this when you next get a vote


Three Waters

Posted on 07-02-2022 11:58 | By Noel Silver

The arrogance of the Government continues to amaze me. They used the Scottish Water System as their future Plan, but this has been soundly rejected is it is completely unworkable in NZ as all our Cities and Towns are too spread out. This Country has lots of very well qualified Water Engineers, but they are not being listened to, and remain sidelined. All the talk and the new Government committee is full of Mayors and others with Political Leanings, and I cannot find one person with Water Engineering Qualifications in any consultation role. The solution to water quality issues is simple. They have been caused by underinvestment by Councils, and No support from Government, who just need to provide low interest loans to Councils so they can make improvements to their Water Systems to ensure that they meet the Drinking Water Standards in NZ, and Problem is Solved.


Absolutely agree Noel

Posted on 07-02-2022 13:36 | By Kancho

Most councils do a good job with water but under investment has been a problem as raising big money from rates etc is difficult. The government of course have restricted councils borrowing percentage of rates and don't assist councils though they take plenty of taxes from them and rate payers. We ratepayers own the assets they want to steal and governments have never run anything that well. This includes water reticulated water in Scotland and the UK. Finally fifty percent governance by iwi selection is not by merit or any expertise. Democracy under attack by this government


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.