Charter schools policy ‘irrational’

Post Primary Teachers' Association Western Bay of Plenty regional chair Jason Smythe says government policy to introduce charter schools is irrational.

The policy was aired during post-election talks between Prime Minister John Key and Act leader John Banks, with trials to go ahead in Christchurch and South Auckland.


Jason Smythe.

Charter schools are publicly funded, but are not subject to all the rules and regulations of traditional public schools.

'While it doesn't directly affect our region yet,” says Jason, 'it's a major concern that educational policy can be set over a cup of tea and a stroke of the pen.

'These reforms are based on models from countries that are educationally and economically performing worse than us – where is the rational thought behind that?

'In tough economic times, how can it be a good idea to establish new schools, new structures and divert public finances from established public schools that are currently running, as best as they can on the smell of an oily rag.”

Jason says parents should have the right to send their children to their local school and expect a quality, well-resourced public education.

Charter schools will receive the same per-child funding from the government as state schools, but have freedom from some Ministry of Education rules and regulations.

Charter schools will be free to set their own curriculum and qualifications, teacher pay-rates, school-day length and school terms.

It also means they are accountable for certain achievement outcomes and standards, which are written by the school's charter or mission.

5 comments

14GK

Posted on 14-12-2011 10:44 | By 14GK

Is this the Jason Smythe that rather publicly said Education should not be politicised? Since then he has gone to the media 3 times to criticise proposed changes in NZ's education. I for one have had enough of PPTA's grizzles about change - they resist it at every step and ignore that "their" ways are not the ONLY ways.


Teacher Unions please come clean

Posted on 14-12-2011 11:11 | By Steve Morris

Come clean there is evidence both for and against charter schools. Let's be clear, the proposal is a TRIAL in South Auckland and Christchurch East. If the trial shows that students benefit would the unions still oppose it? Wouldn't it be more truthful to say that they are more afraid of the introduction of measures such as performance pay where excellent teachers are paid more and worse performing teachers paid less? I am far, far from an ACT supporter but I know enough to say they DID campaign on these kind of reforms. The left side of the political spectrum need to stop making "irrational" arguments and keep to the facts


Hiwinui

Posted on 14-12-2011 13:09 | By Hiwinui

I don't know whether this will work, but a trial in the most deprived areas of South Auckland is worth watching. I am willing to bet that most of the opponents of this policy voted for MMP. This is what happens when parties try to stitch together a government. Be prepared for future "weird" policies when a future Labour led government has to rely on fringe allies.


For the Children

Posted on 14-12-2011 17:26 | By carpedeum

Other than my (now adult) children attending local primary schools, I have had no involvement with education.I commend this Governement for attempting to break the cycle of failure for 20% of our NZ kids. Surely schools are for the children attending them, and how to best equip them for a productive life ahead -SPECIALLY those who come from homes where Education is not valued? Lets at least give it a try - current methods are obviously NOT WORKING


McSchool

Posted on 15-12-2011 09:40 | By bigted

A clear example of how big business can avoid tax, whilst gaining public support. McChicken library class everyone? Fonterra lunch break? Cadbury gym for PE? Contrary to some folks opinion, education works well for 80% of students. Unfortunately the other 20% will always struggle no matter what resources are thrown at them. QED.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.