Election Focus: national asset sales

Partial ownership of New Zealand's power companies and airline will go to the highest bidder if National gains a second term in government.


National is planning to introduce a mixed ownership model for the state owned assets of Air New Zealand, and power companies Genesis, Meridian, Mighty River Power and Solid Energy.

The party estimates the partial sale will generate between $5 billion and $7 billion in three to five years, which will go towards paying down national debt.

National's plan involves increasing competition by transferring assets between state owned generators.

National candidate for Tauranga Simon Bridges says history has proven that businesses benefit from mixed ownership.

'It is very clear that businesses operate with both private and public ownership are better, more effective businesses, you just have to look at Air New Zealand, which is 30 per cent privately owned and it's a roaring success.

'Here in Tauranga you have the Port of Tauranga and TrustPower, both are partly privately owned.”

Under National, proceeds from the sale of assets will go into the new Future Investment Fund to be used to purchase new schools and hospitals without having to borrow from overseas lenders.

'By doing this we are able to invest in the future without having to borrow, if Labour does not do this it will still have to find the funds from somewhere – it will be borrowed from overseas.”

Both Labour and the Green Party have hit out hard against the sale of assets.

Labour candidate Deborah Mahuta-Coyle says Labour is absolutely against the sale of New Zealand assets.

'John Key has made it quite clear that National cannot guarantee the 49 per cent of sales will not end up in foreign ownership.”

Deborah says the estimated $7 billion National intends to make from asset sales will be spent three times over by the political party.

'They will be spending three times the amount in paying down debt, farmers' irrigation and funding for schools – there is only so much money.”

If state owned enterprises were to be sold, first option to buy is for New Zealanders with National expecting 85-90 per cent of ownership to remain in the hands of Kiwis.

However, Deborah says many Kiwis cannot afford the cost of living, let alone purchasing shares in power companies.

'It makes no sense. Everyone remembers when we sold our state assets in the 1980s and we know we shouldn't repeat the mistake.

'People are struggling and cannot afford to buy shares – it won't be ordinary Kiwis buying shares.”

Simon says New Zealanders are looking for safe quality investments and will take the opportunity to invest in state assets.

'We accept that not every New Zealander will be able to purchase shares, but many Kiwis will.

'We are not going to hock assets the way Labour did in the 1980s as trade sales – we will keep the majority control of 51 per cent.”

National says it is committed to returning the country to surplus by 2014-15 and to do so will put a cap on government spending to $800 million in 2013 and 2014 and $1.2 billion in 2015.

Instead of selling off these companies, Deborah says Labour will pay off the country's debt by introducing a capital gains tax, which she says will generate $78 million in the first year.

Debt will also be paid off through an increase in the introduction of the Emissions Trading Scheme by 2014 under Labour.

Green Party Tauranga candidate Ian McLean says ETS is a key part of Green Party policy and will look to revoke the current $2 billion a year in government subsidies to businesses.

'We have now identified the businesses that are producing pollution and we need to put a price on that pollution.

'Agriculture is one of the biggest carbon emissions industry, we need to bring it into the ETS.”

When it comes to the sale of power companies, Ian says the government is 'crazy” to sell.

'If you have a profitable business, you have something that is working and generating profits you would be crazy to sell it. You should not be focusing on the income from the business, but on the capacity to take the business further.”

Labour's changes to the tax policy will see people earning more than $150,000 a year face higher taxes, which will also contribute to paying off debt, says Deborah.

'We have the same goal as National to be back in black by 2014 – up front Labour will borrow more at the start to do so, but will pay it off in the same time.”

Deborah says people will face higher power bills if power companies are privatised.

'It is important we remain in control of these companies to control the price and dividends – and in case of any emergency.

'If there is a black out, we need to know we have control.”

New Zealand First candidate Brendan Horan says the government needs to be asked about what share of state assets will be sold and who they will be sold to, before a decision is made.

16 comments

Smoke & mirrors....

Posted on 24-11-2011 13:41 | By Writerman

Is what this election has been about. If the assets go under the hammer there is no mechanism for ensuring the buyesr are Kiwis. And that's juts the beginning check out the rest here: http://writerman-ohmyblog.blogspot.com/


LETS SELL THE FAMILY SILVER

Posted on 24-11-2011 14:08 | By WARTS N ALL

Like that worked last time, Telecom, power companies etc are all more or less owned from overseas, prices have rocketed and all the profits go west, same concept applies to the banks to.


Asset Sales

Posted on 24-11-2011 14:58 | By Pamax

Labour's "No Asset Sales" slogan implies that National's assets sales via the "mixed ownership model" of energy companies will be detrimental to NZ consumers. Labour's slogan infers that Kiwis will lose control of these assets and electricity prices will rise. Their (Labour's) mantra also implies that keeping 100% ownership of these SOE's within the state's assets will ensure stable electricity pricing. The facts are different, under Helen Clark's Govt retail electricity prices rose 72% over their 9 years in office. Labour's Minister of Energy was David Parker, a current member of Goff's front bench. Why did electricity prices rise so rapidly under Parker's watch? Struggling consumers and pensioners complained to the Minister but they were coining massive profits and ignored the community's hardship pleas. So much for Goff's insinuation that a Labour Govt can be trusted to keep electricity prices down. Max Lewis, Mt Maunganui


Reply to Max Lewis

Posted on 24-11-2011 15:53 | By Gee Really

Overall I'm a National supporter but I think it's a bit unfair to blame Labour for electricity price rises when the Nats Max Bradford was the architect of so-called electricity reform which set the inevitable in motion. How could a country of 3 million have supported all those electricity companies and separate line companies with all their staff, shareholders and highly paid CEO's? Thanks Mr Bradford. That said, asset sales now we have a choice of either spending a lot less, borrowing more or selling assets. We can't have our cake and eat it too. I favour drastic spending cuts, especially in the unproductive sector. Why do we import foreign labour for kiwifruit when we have all that unemployment. Incidentally, how much have we caught up on Australia over the last 3 years? Still a Nat though, the best of a mediocre bunch.


Number of Shares purchased Not Ltd.

Posted on 24-11-2011 15:58 | By straw

So far there is no limitation to how many each individual can purchase, and if not all uplifted by NZers the offshore investors will swoop and take the rest. Anyone have a spare million $$s in their bank? Therefore this is really a policy for the extremely wealthy, not the Mums and Dads. I am sad that this country is so short sighted.We are selling our future generations heritage.


Illogical

Posted on 24-11-2011 17:01 | By dgk

Why on earth would I consider borrowing money to buy shares in something that I already own. The logic defies me.


Think about it for just one moment

Posted on 24-11-2011 19:01 | By ROB PATERSON

Sale of our few remaining national assets whether its in mixed ownership or not, capitulation on the Foreshore & Seabed issue and a failure to endorse the philosophy of one law for every citizen is in my view the thin edge of the wedge for most NZers. It is little wonder over 100 Kiwis a day are leaving for Australia.And before anyone criticises me for speaking out let me just say I do not belong to Act, Labour, NZ First or Greens parties.The obvious conclusions reached on going down these tracks are based on common sense and past history.


Asset Sales

Posted on 24-11-2011 19:50 | By Pamax

I am not prepared to discuss topical issues with anyone who writes under a non de plume. If you have a worthy opinion then have the decency to sign it. Max Lewis, Mt Maunganui.


IS THE SPOKEN WORD TABOO?

Posted on 24-11-2011 21:37 | By EYESPY

PM Key's little soiree with ACT's Banks in a Newmarket cafe a public place to send out a message for public consumption was solely a political propaganda stunt and rank National spin-doctoring. It follows you get what you go looking for and if Mr Key doesn't like the recorder incident, then tough bickies. For him to compare it with the antics that ‘News of the World' was engaged in is both inane insulting and ludicrous. His petulance and mock dismay do his cause little good, frankly he had it coming to him. Whoever left the machine turned on in a pouch strategically placed on the table knew exactly what he/she was doing and it has the look of a reprehensible media ploy. Having said that, if Messrs. Key and Banks didn't realise what was going on or didn't even wonder what the black object was on the table right in front of their eyes, well then you have to seriously question their powers of observation and whether they are equipped with enough nous to run a country even the size of little old New Zealand.No doubt they discussed wonderous things like asset sales, FS&SB Act, grovelling to the Maori party, Waitangi handouts and how to avoid having to support one law for all people. $11billion won't go far in meeting the $300million a week deficit or stop 700 people emigrating overseas each week !! The conclusion is the ‘Key ring' in its own whimpish way is no better than fortress ‘Helengrad' was.Who would vote for any party that is dealing to you in this way ? Ex National supporter.


GO MAX L

Posted on 24-11-2011 21:55 | By PLONKER

So you don't like what is said so just "WALK AWAY" ... that all sounds very fair now doesn't it. Sounds like you have lost the debate already!


apologies to Max Lewis for debating the issue

Posted on 24-11-2011 23:37 | By Gee Really

Not sure why Max wants my name. I thought I'd raised some good points (facts) and he might respond to the actual issues, not the person. I know it's an unpalatable thought that National's Max Bradford brought in the so-called electricity reforms, but let's be honest about this. I'm sure he's comfortable on his parliamentary super pension. As for Air NZ quoted in the story above, a wonderful example of taxpayers bailing out a public company, and then in Tauranga being repaid with some of the higher airfares you could imagine. Nice one. The bit in the story I agree with is to fund expenditure you either borrow more or sell assets. There is an alternative, lower expenditure and National whilst not perfect tends to do a better job at this than some of the more dreamy political parties. Just look at Deborah's statement 'If there is a black out, we need to know we have control.” Hmmmm?


Appalling proposal to sell state assets bad enough

Posted on 25-11-2011 07:18 | By Investigator

But what about the way NATIONAL has permitted shonky finance companies to deal to our vulnerable and elderly investors.It was like a licensed free for all feeding frenzy yet no real meaningful action has been taken to address these rorts nor to prevent them recurring. The slap with 'the wet bus' ticket penalties are wrong and pathetic. The whole saga has been like something out of the Dark Ages with no last man standing in most cases. National have exacerbated the problem by ensuring deposit interest rates are reduced to ridiculously low levels and yet bleat about people not saving - GET A LIFE. Furthermore National wonder why the tax take is plunging- DAH -so why would you vote for these NATIONAL couldn't care less bozos ??


Unfair to blame Nats for finance companies

Posted on 25-11-2011 08:46 | By Gee Really

I take issue with "Investigator" blaming govt for people investing in finance companies that fail. Anyone with money to spare or invest has always had a free choice. That has been banks with very little risk but lower interest rates, or finance companies with higher interest but also higher risk. What I feel is wrong is the govt extending that guarantee to finance companies later in the piece. Look how much that has cost us in relation to the late Alan Hubbards dealings. Also in regard to Investigator, if deposit rates were higher, so would the cost of borrowing and inflationary effects on the cost of living. Whoever said "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction" is right. Not the govt's fault that some are not up to seeing that.


Don't be silly Gee Really

Posted on 25-11-2011 12:11 | By Investigator

No one is blaming National for finance companies or forcing greedy ninnies to invest funds with them.However National and previous Labour Governments created a financial environment with few rules or regulations (akin to wild west ) that offered little protection to those that invested. In addition the penalties involved were laughable.The huge loss of funds and ridiculously low interest means the victims don't spend anymore. Therefore the wider economy doesn't get a kickstart and the results are becoming obvious - got the picture now ?


@ PAMAX aka MAX LEWIS

Posted on 25-11-2011 16:09 | By EYESPY

Sorry old boy if you won't respond to non de plumes then you will end up only writing to or blogging with yourself and that can't be good.Lighten up it is just a sport.


keep it kiwi

Posted on 25-11-2011 23:58 | By blocker

just a thought could they use the kiwi retirement funds to buy the assets then its retained by kiwis


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.