Election Focus: national standards

A Tauranga principal says politicians should be looking at how to improve education rather than tossing national standards policy around like a football.

Otumoetai Primary School principal Geoff Opie says national standards is not the way to improve education and the focus should be on reducing poverty and increasing school resources.


Otumoetai Primary School Principal Geoff Opie says national standards will not create a better education for children.

'The goal of national standards is to raise achievement, but national standards cannot raise achievement.

'To get better education you need good quality teaching and resources and for children to come from a safe and secure environment.”

National standards is used in primary and intermediate schools to rank children aged 5-12 at ‘above', ‘below' or ‘well below' benchmarks in reading, writing and arithmetic.

They were introduced in 2010 by the National-led government after it was promised in the 2008 election.

'These standards were introduced as a way to help identify children who are underperforming when in fact teachers already know who those children are.

'It is, in effect, a way of labeling,” says Geoff.

He says 14 per cent of children are underachieving and the majority of these are from low socio-economic backgrounds.

'Children coming from a deprived background, who come to school in the morning without breakfast, these are the children that are underachieving.

'We need to give children a better start, but there are some parents that are not able to facilitate this.”

National candidate for Tauranga Simon Bridges says one in five children leave school without basic literacy and numeracy skills, and national standards is crucial in ensuring children learn these.

'National standards are signposts that show what children in Years 1- 8 should be able to achieve in reading, writing, and maths, and by when.

'We want to be able to identify children falling behind, and get them the support they need.”

Geoff says national standards fail to recognise the progress made by students within a year group.

'It does not acknowledge the value added factor.

'A child may start the year reading at an eight-year-old level and by the end of the year they may be reading at a 10-year-old level, but they still may not reach the required national standard, and therefore fail.”

Simon says the government is undertaking ongoing evaluation of national standards by ERO and the establishment of a National Standards Sector Advisory Group.

'You still need to know where students are at to be able to bring them up to that level.

'If we don't, before we know it they are at high school and they don't have the required skills.”

He also says the government is investing $36 million to develop programmes for children needing extra support and placing 50 experts in schools to provide specialised help. Green candidate for Tauranga Ian McLean says the Greens are completely against national standards and will scrap them.

'National standards is setting students up for failure by setting one school against another – we want to go back to a system of in-school assessment.”

Labour will ditch the national standards, but will look to keep some form of nationalised progress reporting.

This will include the use of assessment tools to determine where a child is at in relation to the curriculum.

Labour candidate for Tauranga Deborah Mahuta-Coyle says Labour will not make national standards compulsory.

'Having national standards on a whole is something that Labour supports, but we recognise that it cannot work for all schools, especially in lower decile schools.

'We will talk to teachers about changing the national standards framework and give schools the choice.”

New Zealand First candidate for Tauranga Brendan Horan says NZ First will look to change the current national standards through an urgent review.

'Teachers are the experts and we are prepared to listen to them.

'Teachers need to be given the tools to teach to student's needs.

'Parents are the first educators, some parents embrace education and teach their children before they enter school, but it is more difficult for others.”

With national standards, Geoff says parents are provided with more comprehensive and easier to follow progress reports with national standards.

'We are now using graphs that track a child's progress – this includes graphs that track the full six years of their schooling.”

Simon says the lack of plain language reporting to parents is one of the reasons for bringing in national standards.

'As local MP I can tell you that parents I meet with regularly are universally in favour of national standards.

'They greatly appreciate learning in plain language how their children are doing.

'The message from parents very clearly is that they like national standards.”

8 comments

National Standards

Posted on 17-11-2011 16:13 | By Debbie Smith

With all due respect to Mr Bridges, the parents who are taking the time to speak with him in this regard are likely to be the parents who's children are doing well, most likely from high decile schools. Unfortunately the children that need more support and are more likely to be performing poorly are from homes where the parents are least likely to speak up. Would you speak up in favour of National Standards if your child was failing? Not likely! With the use of National Standards these children are being labelled and told they are failures....imagine being told you are a failure at 5 - 10 yrs of age? That would turn any child off school and learning. Well done Geoff Opie on speaking up! We need teachers energies to be focused on supporting these children and teaching and learning, not spending wasted time on 'measuring them' against others and needless administration!


NO MATE, I T IS THE WAY

Posted on 18-11-2011 10:34 | By PLONKER

With a national standard then an employer can be a little better informed about students results, rather than the personal views of a teacher about a student that are inclined to be tainted so useless. Currently you can not compare a student from one school to another on a common-sense basis, so the results produced by schools are meaningless.


IS MY KID FAILING?

Posted on 18-11-2011 13:19 | By THE PELICAN BRIEF

@ Debbie Smith, yes indeed I want to know that rather than some PC woffle rubbish about not telling someone you have no aptitude for this ... that means I would redirect the kids attention to something that they are better at so a better use of the school, teachers and all resources and give them a fighting chance to get a paying job and so contribute to NZ as a whole rather have a failed (but did not know becasue of some PC BS rubbish) kid churned out of a secondary school then discovering "Oh crap I am a failure...". Truth is the schooling schemes now are failing our kids not the other way around. Get with the program my dear.


One Size doesnt fit all system

Posted on 18-11-2011 15:40 | By The Tomahawk Kid

REMOVE government from their monopoly on the education system if you really want to see better results. Well done for speaking up Geoff, but asking for MORE of what got you there in the first place will only result in more of the same.


A TO F IS SIMPLE FOLKS

Posted on 18-11-2011 18:41 | By PLONKER

Or if you still think that is to hard then cut it down to two options of 'Y' or 'N' (or Pass/fail), how simple do you want the message to be! That is all that is needed! What else do you or ya kids need to know!


MATCH KIDS TO TEACHINGS

Posted on 19-11-2011 13:54 | By PLONKER

I a kid shows a learning level higher than age then move the kid on, if they are slow then place them according to the ability/capability. That then means the kids are challenged at a level located where they are at. Like is this obvious or what! Of course we can not tell a kid that he is exceptional and we will try and make the best of his educational skills for fear of not being "PC to the other 999 kids, what a world we live in ... with all this PC shite!


LEAVE OUR KIDS ALONE!

Posted on 21-11-2011 19:09 | By YOGI

if teachers stopped interfering in politics and policy because it is not there job and if politicians stopped interring in peoples lives and let them live, then apply that idea to our kids I am sure all would be a lot better. Add to that a few picnic baskets and well I would even be happy to.


Its what they want

Posted on 23-11-2011 23:12 | By The Tomahawk Kid

Politicians only interfere in our lives because the majority give them their permission to do so - and then MOAN when it happens. They do this in their endeavour to have a say in what to do with other peoples earnings, which in turn gives other people a say in what must be done with THEIR earnings, instead of voting for politicians who will let them keep their OWN money to spend on things they value.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.