Pipeline works stir job loss fears

Central city businesses are bracing themselves for losses in income and jobs as the next stage of Tauranga's Southern Pipeline works contract approaches the CBD.


Works on the Southern Pipeline in Memorial Park.

Tauranga central city businesses stand to lose between $17m and $40m in income during the Devonport Road pipeline construction period, and more than 200 jobs.

The figures, which are contained in a report into the project's impact, are formulated by Dr Warren Hughes of the Waikato University's department of economics.

The study was first presented at an Environment Court hearing in 2008, where Mainstreet Tauranga retailers argued for the waterfront route instead of laying the pipeline along Devonport Road.

The issue resurfaced at the recent Tauranga City Council monitoring committee meeting where the Mainstreet report stated the project is still a major concern because of the lack of access, traffic delays and other factors.

In reply to a question from Councillor Larry Baldock, Mainstreet manager Kirby Weis says the damage will still be done even with the pipeline stopping at Elizabeth Street or 1st Avenue.

'It depends which way it's going to go across the harbour,” says Kirby.

'At the moment it's probably stopping at 1st Ave, because if they are going to do a submersion pipe they will have to lay it out along 1st Ave.”

At the time of the report, there were 1500 cars travelling along Devonport Road every hour, says Kirby.

'That is one of the main accesses that come into the CBD.

'What we are trying to explain, and at the Environment Court hearings as well, is it's not so much the direct impact on the city, it's the stopping of access coming to it.

'When you have 1500 cars travelling along that road every hour for that 15 week period, that will limit the amount of access into the city.

'It's more the flow-on effects that it has.

'It will affect the 61 businesses that are directly affected from the construction, but the flow-on effect to the city by the reduction of access for the public will be severe.”

The shortest construction period to lay the pipeline from Memorial Park to the top of Devonport Road is 15 weeks. The longer it takes the worse the effects will be.

The study finds the main parameters are: the percentage of the CBD affected; 30 per cent, 40 per cent, or 50 per cent; the time that the construction will take on Devonport Road three, four or five months, and the percentage of revenue lost by CBD businesses over this time, 20 per cent, 40 per cent, 60 per cent or 80 per cent.

Some Cameron Road businesses claimed a 75 per cent revenue loss during the 2008 cycleway/water-pipe construction, which stretched out for months longer than forecast.

If the Devonport Road construction extends to five months, it will affect half the CBD businesses with the losses rising to $42.49 million and 634 jobs respectively.

Dr Hughes says the figures are conservative because no losses were estimated for business services sectors such as legal, accounting, marketing and advertising.

The estimated losses are restricted to ‘shops' that rely on foot traffic and parking close-by to their location.

Mainstreet wants a contact person to be available at all times who is able to act upon sources of complaint for construction activities not being carried out in accordance with the approved construction management agreement.

It wants the stages of construction identified and what the work is entailed in each stage and timeframe; the hours of work, days of work and date of construction for this section of the route to be negotiated with Mainstreet Tauranga and its members.

Mainstreet also wants an acoustic engineer to indentify and mitigate noise levels from construction equipment and activities.

It wants vehicle traffic and pedestrian flow management including identifying staged management of the construction process that will result in restrictions being placed upon traffic and pedestrian flow.

Mainstreet wants priority given to night works to allow for the least impact on traffic flows into the area.

The minimum 3.5 month construction period will have a business, social, community and economic impact, says Kirby, who notes it is a long enough period for people to change travel and buying habits.

It will take an enormous amount of advertising and marketing to attract these customers into the city during and well after construction has been completed – and Mainstreet wants council funding to assist with that.

Mainstreet also wants environmental compensation from Tauranga City Council to mitigate the effects of construction upon the business activities in the form of but not limited to a relaxation of parking fees during construction.

Kirby offered to send copies of the report and the relief sought by Mainstreet to all councillors.

The Memorial Park to 1st Ave section is programmed for construction around financial year 2013/14, though that may change in the new Ten Year Plan, which is under discussion.

You may also like....

11 comments

Disruption

Posted on 29-08-2011 13:24 | By juliecan

Council need to think ahead about implications for every thing they agree on.From cutting down trees to disrupting traffic. The council complained about 'Boobs on bikes' disrupting traffic for an hour but they are happy to cause disruption for up to 5 months?


No Long Term Planning Again

Posted on 29-08-2011 14:32 | By Jitter

This council and previous councils (the highly paid staff) haven't got a clue how to plan long term in a major project such as this. The first point is that this project should never have been approved. Separate sewage treatment plants situated at strategic point around the city was the way to go. External consultants came up with the Southern Pipeline solution and TCC went with it. Now the pipeline is approaching the CBD it will cause major disruptions to traffic and businesses for five months but do TCC care, not likely. They got their way so stuff the consequences.The $42.49 million projected business losses should be added to the overall project cost to give a true figure. On top of this will be another $60 to $100 million to upgrade the existing plant at Te Maunga to handle the additional waste. Oh well it's only money so TCC can hit the ratepayers again, and again, and again to pay for their ongoing bad decisions.


On Deaf Ears . ..

Posted on 30-08-2011 06:34 | By makkas

As a business that has recently been through this I fully understand the concerns. I hit brick wall after brick wall when looking for some sort of compensation. The road outside my shop closed for 10 days. It was deverstating for business. Revenue plumeted to just 20% of what it had been . . . We survived but only just! It seems a simply solution would be to factor in business loss when in the tendering process. It seems big business still gets its money no matter what. Try running the pipeline past the supermarket chains and see if they take it on the chin . .? Bankruptcy by Council & Government Departments, Yep thats about right!


kick in the guts

Posted on 30-08-2011 11:23 | By tonyb1

Council need to understand that it is the shops that create cash flow for the city, that pays the rates and gives visitors a reason too come too the area, sorry shop owners but our lord mayor see's you as a disposable side issue that will be rplaced by another dream seeking retailer who thinks that he can make money in the CDB Main street is dying but how would TGA survive without the retailers ? The powers to be do not want small retailers they want the body corporates to run things, easier to manage and more money to be spent getting around council employees


How are council supposed to build anything?

Posted on 30-08-2011 15:33 | By Inconvenient Truth

I thought roadworks, upgrade and repairs were a part of living in a city. Or is the Council supposed to wave a magic wand and it all just happens? Maybe Mainstreet should concentrate on promoting the city center shops. All I read is complaining about parking, roadworks, etc etc. They do a good job of telling everyone about the negatives and then are surprised when shoppers don't come. A friend rented a shop in one of those big shopping developments. The rent was much more than downtown. I guess because the rent in a center also pays for joint facilities like the huge carparks. My idea is for downtown retailers to use the cheaper rents to provide cheaper goods than the super type centers. Then people might shop there. About the pipe, I'd rather have it go alongside the road than the waterfront.


CLUELESS

Posted on 30-08-2011 18:39 | By PLONKER

The Movie of course, the blond part anyway ... The more important issue is the complete and utter pointlessness of this project, a lot of money is being spent on a pipe that is of no use for anything and never will be.


Cheaper non disruptive options completely ignored by TCC

Posted on 01-09-2011 18:03 | By KAMIKAZE

Yes sometimes traffic & roading disruptions are a fact of city life. But when TCC Council did not need to go down the obscenely expensive Southern Pipeline track encompassing half of Tauranga City and were told years ago what disruptions would flow you just have to ask how voters could support these financially clueless nincompoops."Whats new pussycat"


THEY WANT TO SPEND THE MOST THAT IS ALL

Posted on 07-09-2011 20:52 | By PLONKER

As long as it is the most expensive, exorbitant, extravagant, lush-us, huge, massive edifice ever created in the Bay that will mean there is not stopping it no matter what the consequences. It has nothing to do with "needed" or "useful" or the financial future of the generations that follow us all, when we are all long gone there will be a brass name plaque saying "LOOK WHAT I DID" ... and they will be happy with the work done. Sadly it will be desperate if it even rises to the level of wanton and frivolous squandering ... #(*&^#&*(^%#%&^& ...


SEEKING ATTENTION

Posted on 08-09-2011 16:54 | By CRUMPY

No other purpose comes to mind for creating all that mess, spending the money, causing disruption, creating financial problems for others. It is all about creating something to do for yet more officals.


ASSURANCE OF NO JOB LOSSES

Posted on 09-09-2011 09:35 | By Secret Squirrel

Anyone loosing a job or business will not have any problems as TCC will move swiftly to reemploy all, pay lots of money .... and certainly you will get a lot more than you expected.


REPEAT BUT BIGGER BY FAR

Posted on 10-09-2011 17:52 | By WORMTONGUE

It was obvious that TCC was planning the Willow Street bus centre job (not that I agree with it being there) as a test to see what happens when a bit of pavement work happens, when the road is closed, to see just what happens, of course they got paid ever week regardless so I guess the answer was decided based on that simple wee conclusion. Simple minds simple ideas, obvious disaster conclusions for everyone else.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.