One step closer to new foreshore law

The Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill has passed its second reading at Parliament.

The Bill will replace the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004. It restores the right of Maori to seek customary title through the courts, while guaranteeing the rights of all New Zealanders in marine and coastal areas.

'Debate on this Bill has confirmed that the status quo of the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 is not an option,” says Attorney General Chris Finlayson.

'Every party which spoke in Parliament acknowledges that law has failed, and has to be changed.

'This Bill makes clear what we all instinctively feel – that no-one owns the common marine and coastal area.

'The government just looks after it for all New Zealanders, present and future. It is a common space, and will not be able to be sold off.

'All New Zealanders have the right equally to walk, swim, fish, sail, dive, surf, picnic or play in it, just as they do now.”

'It also restores the right of Maori to go to court and seek recognition in the High Court of customary title where it has been exercised since 1840.

'The Bill sets out tests for proving customary marine title based on the Court of Appeal's decision in the Ngati Apa case, as well as the common law in Canada and Australia.

'These codified tests and awards for customary marine title provide for certainty and equity, rather than protracted legalistic arguments that benefit only lawyers, and which would lead us to a similar result.”

The Maori Affairs Select Committee reported the Bill back to Parliament on February 9 after considering it for five months.

The Bill's second reading was delayed when Parliament was adjourned following the February 22 earthquake.

The Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill Summary

  • Repeals the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004.
  • Applies to the area formerly known as the foreshore and seabed, which will be known in the future as the marine and coastal area.
  • Creates a common space in the marine and coastal area (the common marine and coastal area) which allows the interests and rights of all New Zealanders in the marine and coastal area to be recognised in law.
  • Guarantees free public access in the common marine and coastal area.
  • Does not affect existing private titles in the marine and coastal area.
  • Guarantees and, in some cases, extends existing rights for navigation, ports, fishing and aquaculture.
  • Provides for the customary interests and rights of Maori in the common marine and coastal area to be recognised.
  • This recognition will include the right to go to the High Court (or negotiate an out-of-court settlement with the Crown) to seek customary marine title for areas with which groups such as iwi and hapu have a longstanding and exclusive history of use and occupation.
  • Unlike private title, customary marine title will be subject to the right of public access and cannot be sold.
  • Similar to private (fee simple) title, customary marine title gives rights to permit activities requiring a resource consent, some conservation activities, protection of wahi tapu, ownership of taonga tuturu found in that space, and ownership of non-Crown minerals. It also gives the customary title holder the right to create a planning document setting out objectives and policies for the area.
  • Groups such as iwi, hapu and whanau will also be able to gain recognition and protection for longstanding customary rights that continue to be exercised. Their association with the common marine and coastal area in their rohe will also be recognised through a right to participate in conservation processes, which formalises existing best practice in coastal management.

18 comments

The Devil is in the detail

Posted on 09-03-2011 13:29 | By morepork

While the above seems fair and reasonable, it does raise a few concerns: 1. How open is the process of gaining Customary rights? Will deals be done in Beehive back offices, or will the process be open to scrutiny, with appeals and objections allowed, as in other legal processes? 2. Most of us are happy to see all NZers enjoying unfettered access to our beaches, with due respect and regard for the rights of local Iwi, but what about existing foreign ownership? Absentee landlords can fence off a beach as "Private Property" and deny access? There is still a lot of "working out" to do on this Bill before I will be comfortable with it, and I suspect I am not the only one...


One Step Closer

Posted on 09-03-2011 13:52 | By Jitter

To National being dumped at the election later this year.


Did National not read 5000 submissions

Posted on 09-03-2011 14:24 | By Rayna

When the govt looks after the FS&SB for all NZers it acknowledges customary rights since 1840. Those of us whose tauiwi ancestors also used the fs&sb count as nothing. Those of us who have known no other home since that time count as nothing. National fails to recognize the love every NZer has for this country when allocating and enabling discrimination and commercial gain to a small group.


Time for Simon to act

Posted on 09-03-2011 14:57 | By JSmithington

I want to know if our MP is going to support this Bill. He seems to have voted for it so far. It's not too late to throw it out, but decision time is getting closer.


foreshore bill

Posted on 09-03-2011 16:20 | By Glen Clova

The supporters of National should hang their heads in shame for letting their party promote and pass this bill.


New Government will just repeal this bad law

Posted on 09-03-2011 16:20 | By Insider

If you want to see what the average Kiwi thinks about this RORT just read the Blog directly below this posted on 1 March 2011 titled "The truth about the Bill'.The peoples comments & opposition are scathing in their attacks and rightly so.This is what the public think right across all NZ.National have not got the guts to hold a binding public referendum on the Marine and Coastal Bill 2010 at the upcoming General Election and they just look and act like the wimps they are.Mainstream New Zealanders are about to be shafted for political expediency to unjustly benefit Maori Iwi .It all reeks of separatism, racism and apartheid.We all know where that leads.


“Debate on this Bill has confirmed”…that 92 % of NZers oppose it.

Posted on 09-03-2011 17:05 | By SpeakUp

Is National on a suicide mission? This bill will breed racism. It allows secret back-room deals with iwi without parliamentary dialogue or public say. It baffles me how far National have moved away from core principles. The ACT party is the only party fighting this bill. NATIONAL?...NEVER AGAIN !


Rewarding non contributing practices

Posted on 09-03-2011 19:59 | By ROCKY

Make no mistake NATIONAL through Key and Finlayson are driving this Pandoras Box for some 'up to no good' reason.They can tinker with the BILL as much as they like the issue is with the intent and the back room done deals will still take place no matter what safeguards are put in place.Racist, separatist & very discrimatory are words that spring to mind.Scamming has a ring to it as well.


Racism abounds

Posted on 10-03-2011 09:36 | By Countrygirl

I have read this bill and pondered the consequences of this bill for myself, my children and my grandchildren and the discrimination that WILL be outpoured against others that are NOT of Maori descent is frightening. I am as much a New Zealander as the Maori and yet they will have more rights. They are NOT indigenous to NZ. We are all immigrants to NZ and should be treated equally, and this Bill will only lead to more disharmony between all the races now represented in NZ culture. I will not be voting National in this next election and regret doing so previously. Shame on John Key for pushing this Parliament when everyones focus is on Christchurch!


Foreshore Bill Madness

Posted on 10-03-2011 09:38 | By [email protected]

Appeasement has gone too far. Say no to minority political blackmail and put principles before desperate election MMP tactics. trev


Empty kettles

Posted on 10-03-2011 10:24 | By Tauiwi

It is noticeable that ten pound poms and two or three generation Kiwis make more noise than 50 generation Maori.


Massaging the mana $

Posted on 10-03-2011 12:15 | By POCO O POCO

Tauiwi ; 50 generations from 1400AD to present time shows they were all breeding at 14years of age.Guess some things never change. If one was a Maori actively involved in ripping off my fellow Kiwis don't think you would be yelling about it from the rooftops.For a non-contributing section of NZ Society in many cases they usually have more than enough to say as it is.Silence indicates stealth.


reply to tauiwi

Posted on 10-03-2011 14:26 | By morepork

It is very usual for the injured party in a 2 sided debate to make a lot of noise about it. Of course Maori (generally - I know some Maori who are not happy about it) are going to say nothing because they stand to gain. Having read the Bill and considered it, I don't think it is SO bad, but it IS divisive and it IS discriminatory, and those are fundamentals that most Kiwis abhor. It should be a "fair go" for ALL, not just ONE group. Unfortunately, we are tied by legal process inherited from Britain to maintain the conditions of this archaic Treaty which anchors our whole Nation in the past, was thrown together hastily to prevent a French takeover, and is not relevant for the future if we are to move forward as ONE nation with respect for ALL ethnicities. I'm starting to think that maybe we SHOULD be a Republic and write a Constitution that would apply to ALL New Zealanders, with equal rights and opportunities for everybody, and respect for the diverse cultures which are now part of our society. (Never thought I'd be in favour of Republicanism, but this Treaty is a millstone around all our necks and, after nearly 200 years, it is time we had an update and dropped it.) I am neither a ten pound pom nor a 3 generation pakeha (although I fail to see how anything other than the CURRENT generation has anything to do with this. Am I responsible for what my father or grandfather did? Are you? I don't think so. But all of us are responsible for our OWN actions, right now...) I AM a passionate Kiwi with a love for this land that is the equal of any from ANY Ethnicity. (And you DON'T have to be here for 6 or 700 years to love this place.) I am NOT anti-Maori or anti-anybody, really. I just want a FAIR deal. This Bill still needs work to make it more open and acceptable, and subject to legal process with regard to Customary Rights applications. As mentioned earlier, I'm also concerned about foreign ownership without constraint. It would be interesting to see what happens if there is a clash between Customary Rights and private ownership by an absentee landlord... Where does that leave the rest of us?


TITLE vs USE

Posted on 11-03-2011 08:37 | By ROCKY

Perhaps the following recent media statement goes some way to showing what the wrong is "While it might suit the political purposes of Turia and Sharples to say the 2004 Act confiscates customary rights they have confused(probably deliberately)'customary rights' with 'customary title'.The Act set up mechanisms whereby iwicould negotiate customary rights with the government.Ngati Porou negotiated with Labour in 2008.Customary title is another matter.If we award title over the seabed to private citizens(iwi are private citizens) we become the first country in the world to do so.This also despite provisions to avert this opens the door to its sale when some court reestablishes the notion that if you own something its yours to sell" That pretty well sums up one of the major issues with the current 2010 Bill.Really it all has nothing to do with customary use it is all about money and greed and getting something for nothing.Best desciption- it is a RORT.


JUST ONE STEP CLOSER TO ...

Posted on 14-03-2011 08:12 | By THE RING MASTER

CIVIL UNREST AS A MINORITY ARE PROVIDED WITH PREFERENCE.


TAUIWI

Posted on 16-03-2011 01:44 | By The Master

What about the 80+ generation Moarori and the 100+ arabic and other europeans that were here can they all cash in on the treaty as it would seem to apply to all those who have been here a while ... but who is counting up the truth these days.


No merit or basis exists

Posted on 18-03-2011 07:16 | By Hebegeebies

This is bad law is the straw that will break the camels back.Unless and until it is repealed it will be the kiss of death to NZ and its financial and social wellbeing.One step closer to the grave as they say.


HOW THINGS CHANGE

Posted on 22-03-2011 08:03 | By THE PELICAN BRIEF

It was not that long ago that when our beaches were invaded, when our freedom was threatened then all the kings men would gather and drive them back into the sea where they came from ... we will fight them in the streets, we will fight them in the air, we will fight them in the fields, we will fight them on the beaches, we will never surrender .... WC, now they just "give" it all away ?


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.