The receiver for The Lakes developer Grasshopper Developments says it will be some time yet before a way forward is found.
The Bank of Scotland called in receivers Korda Mentha on Friday.
The Lakes.
'It's pretty early days for us,” says receiver Grant Graham.
'I've only had three days there, so what we are really trying to do now is just understand all the issues pertaining to the development and work out how best to proceed from here.
'We appreciate that it's a strategic development in the Tauranga area both for its size and for its location.
'So that's very important for everyone.
'We'll be liaising with council and directors and just working out what the best way forward is to ensure that the development has its best chance to ensure it maximises is potential.”
It is expected to take a couple of weeks to work out a way forward.
'It's not like a little 10 section development where you can very quickly say ‘this is what we will be doing'.
'So there's some real grunt work required to make sure that this thing is put forward in its best light, whatever that might mean.
'On something this size you don't just hop in there and stick a sign up – there's 4.8 hectares from the front gate to the back gate,” says Grant.
'It's a very big site. That's what we will be spending the next period of time working through.”
Grasshopper Developments is a private company and the amount involved is between the bank and the developer, says Grant.
He hasn't any history with the site and doesn't yet have any knowledge on the background to the receivership.
'The economy has had a major impact on all developments like this,” says Grant. 'There's no way that these guys would be immune, that's a common thread up and down New Zealand.”



12 comments
Caught in a bubble
Posted on 02-03-2011 12:31 | By SpeakUp
...of naivety, greed, short-sightedness and imprudence. Limited knowledge of history, economy and monetarism doesn't help either. And THAT's a common thread up and down New Zealand.
TURKEYS and CASH GOBBLERS
Posted on 02-03-2011 13:46 | By POCO O POCO
A mention is made of liaising with Council and assume that is Tauranga City Council .That would be a useless futile exercise because TCC can't seem to keep its own financial debt liability above water.If Receivers think there is any monetary mileage in the TCC RATEPAYERS think again.Bank of Scotland should have had more brains its not the only lemon they have in Tauranga City.
Stage 1
Posted on 02-03-2011 15:31 | By The author of this comment has been removed.
Why do developments like this continue, you could see after Stage 1, it was slow and not making the projected amount???? Now it is huge and not making money???
NO MONEY IN IT
Posted on 02-03-2011 15:50 | By The Master
Many reasons I am sure exist, economics is only one, perhaps the level of fees charged to developers also is a massive obstacle to the job also, I would expect that about $30,000 - $40,000 per residential site has to be paid but most would not have. The developer would have paid huge monies for land, roads, services, landscaping, donate green areas and of course the huge cost of waiting for the officials to shuffle paper for 6-7 years from when it all started back in 2004 or so, the bills would be huge. Only with sales would the red become black, the market crashed and the game is over.
Bad News
Posted on 02-03-2011 17:30 | By Jitter
One of the main contributors to this sorry situation is the ridiculous fees that TCC continue to insist on charging developers. It is just greed on the part of TCC. The economic downturn has not helped at all either. I have great sympathy for Graham Lee of Grasshopper Developments who came up with a brilliant concept. Ratepayers are definitely not up for paying for this so hope the receivers don't expect anything from us. This development should have been a shining star in Tauranga's future. TCC development costs and the downturn in the economy have really stuffed this up.
Jitter Bug
Posted on 02-03-2011 18:45 | By al pillocksworth
So who would Jitter have pay for water, sewerage etc fees? The choice is either the developer or the rest of us mug ratepayers. A few years ago developers had no problem in buying land, seeing the price double in a few years and selling it and making a huge profit for doing very little. The Master is right in that the market has crashed. This time there's no quick profit, or no profit at all. The Lakes is nice but look at whats happened to NZs economy.
JITTER IS WRONG
Posted on 02-03-2011 19:50 | By TERMITE
The Tauranga ratepayer is going to be hammered ... is fact is hammered now because the Southern Sewer Pipeline. The Council is spending money furiously on this project to cart crap from one end of town to the other, but now with the demise of the Lakes now there is nothing to pay for it, and no crap to cart, what a waste of money and time and rates.
Doomed
Posted on 03-03-2011 07:25 | By spike
This development was doomed when Grasshopper allowed the construction of the "Coronation Street" style high density housing adjacent to standard sites that were bound by overly strict design guidelines. The huge increase in prices when Stage 2 was released were plainly unjustifiable under the then existing economic conditions, with many sites having views across the lake, but also straight toward the industrial subdivision.
Big development
Posted on 04-03-2011 20:09 | By WIDOWMAKER
Guess it was all just to much, but teh planning provided for some high density housing and that was really a great idea as best to have some around for the less fortunate.
For sale signs
Posted on 04-03-2011 20:20 | By WIDOWMAKER
Looks like the adjoining property that was to be developed also is up for sale, perhaps COuncil could invest in this and add it to the Lakes, this would mean a lot fo new land available for families at an affordable price and the developers would not be making a lot of money put of it.
An ugly mix
Posted on 05-03-2011 09:07 | By Insider
Widowmaker - I believe the land you refer to is not adjoining it is across the road more like adjacent or nearby would better describe it. Currently not suitable or zoned 4 high density residential development. For gods sake are you off your rocker don't try to encourage TCC into any other private business they can't manage what losers they have already.Thankfully it is hardly likely any financier would look at TCC with its unsustainable $400m core debt so why panic I suppose.
PAPAMOA AND
Posted on 14-03-2011 07:53 | By THE RING MASTER
IT IS NOT SO SMART, POLICY REFERS TO NODES THAT MEANS THAT DEVELOPMENT SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED TO CLUSTER RATHER THAN BE ELONGATED TOWARDS EAST CAPE OR THERE ABOUTS. THIS IS BECASUE SERVICES COST A LOT MORE TO PLACE FOR LESS USAGE. END RESULT RATEPAYERS PAY MORE 4 LESS.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.