Council venues rearranged

Tauranga City Council is looking at alternative venues for the first of their 2015 meetings scheduled for the last week in January.

Due to the mould discovered in council buildings late last year, the council chambers are currently occupied by staff.


Council staff in the chambers expect to be moved before the end of the month. Photo: TCC.

They are expected to be gone by January 27, says Mayor Stuart Crosby.

'If they are still required for the staff then we will find somewhere else,” says Stuart.

'I think the intention is they will all be gone by the end of the month. The other two councils have all the IT, the microphones and all that.”

The regional council premises are already used for Regional Land Transport Committee meetings says Stuart.

'I'm not sure at this stage if it will be required,” he adds.

City council meetings resume on Tuesday January 27, with further Ten Year Plan meetings for the rest of that week.

The council has arranged leases for part of the Westpac Building in Devonport Road, the former ANZ Building in Spring Street and a building in Durham Street beside the car park.

This is to house about 300 staff displaced following announcements on December 15 and 23 that toxic black stachybotrys mould was affecting staff health.

While parts of the buildings can be re-occupied after affected carpets are removed and cleaned, there are also leaks that may take more time to track.

Council staff currently camped out in Baycourt are among the first to move, because the theatre and exhibition space is required for shows.

The Durham Street building was previously leased to the council for the documents digitising contract, and space formerly occupied by a language school on the first floor has also become available.

Council staff are still acquiring information on the state of the buildings and working at getting them in a state for staff to return, says Stuart.

A comprehensive report on the two building's water tightness and earthquake strengthening requirements is expected in March, which is also expected to outline better cost estimates.

9 comments

Now.....

Posted on 14-01-2015 14:10 | By Jimmy Ehu

is it time to re visit the "tupperwaka" feasibility study, the perfect solution.


Jimmy Ehu

Posted on 14-01-2015 15:30 | By YOGI BEAR

I could agree to that so long as it is aligned with the nearest slipway so as when the best opportunity arises (maximum inmates within) we can give it a push into the tide once and for all.


Evidence?

Posted on 14-01-2015 17:08 | By DAD

We haven't had any proof there is any mould, perhaps it is just on the wish list to spruce up the offices. A photo would be nice!


Perpetuating the myth, the spin ...

Posted on 14-01-2015 19:14 | By Murray.Guy

... house about 300 staff displaced following announcements on December 15 and 23 that toxic black stachybotrys mould was affecting staff health. ... I'm not aware that there is ANY actual evidence of ANY impact on the health of staff, just an outside chance at best that it might have or could! We do know this 'ebola response' is having a huge impact on the health of our finances!


Rotten wood ??

Posted on 14-01-2015 23:36 | By paperclip

Anyone know where this dastardly mould was discovered & the quantity at this stage ?


Council

Posted on 15-01-2015 06:36 | By Capt_Kaveman

cant even keep wharf st bus seats dry due to leaks, the past council members and still sitting ones have alot to answer to


Council

Posted on 15-01-2015 09:22 | By philiphallen

You better not pass the cost of this monumental council cock-up on to us rate payers. You


murray

Posted on 15-01-2015 09:51 | By Wonkytonk

wow, comments like that wonder why you are not elected. if experts say people are at risk and have been exposed for some time do you really think people need to be exposed to prove a point..>?! remember pike mine when people/management ignore such risks, people like you who knew about these leaks when you had a seat in council. head in the sand.


Just prefer facts Wonkytonk

Posted on 15-01-2015 17:10 | By Murray.Guy

Wonkytonk, my emphasis is on the spin, preferring facts. The article implies multiple staff HAVE been affected, in contrast to the latest 'expert report' which said no risk. If you are okay with spin then I accept that as your right, but I respectfully suggest it is not I with a 'head in the sand'. Please leave Pike River out of this as there is absolutely NO comparison, with profiteering corporates ignoring proven risks.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.