Cemetery back with Maori

The Mission Cemetery in Tauranga will be handed back into Maori ownership after the New Zealand Mission Trust Board Empowering Bill was passed overnight.

Maori Party co-leader Te Ururoa Flavell says the bill puts right a century old wrong that alienated Ngati Tapu and Ngai Tamarawaho from the land.

Mission Cemetery [Otamataha].

'About 150 years ago, land in central Tauranga was confiscated from tangata whenua by the Crown, as a consequence of their participation in the battles of Pukehinahina and Te Ranga.

'Once confiscated, the land was sold on by the Crown to the Church Mission Society and later transferred to the New Zealand Mission Trust Board, who in conjunction with the hapu of Ngati Tapu and Ngai Tamarawaho, have worked to transfer the land interests back.”

The bill to enable the land transfer passed its final reading last night.

Te Ururoa says it is an important milestone for the hapu and iwi of Tauranga, but also an important part of the history of NZ.

'This year we have commemorated the 150th anniversaries of battles that took place as part of the land wars. Orakau, Pukehinahina, and soon we will be going to Te Ranga, to commemorate that battle in which both Maori and Pakeha lives were lost.

'The consequences of the battles that took place at Pukehinahina and Te Ranga, and indeed of the land wars generally, did not end when the battle ended.

'There is a wider history that needs to be remembered, and I am so pleased that I was able to sponsor this Bill as a Member of Parliament.

'I acknowledge the hapu, the whanau, and indeed the tipuna who have played a role in the story of this Bill, and I also acknowledge the members of the New Zealand Mission Trust Board and the Otamataha Trust who fought hard to do the right thing by these hapu and the people of Tauranga.”

33 comments

there

Posted on 29-05-2014 12:03 | By Capt_Kaveman

is that bad word again "confiscated" the correct meaning is returning the land after being conquered


Burying the hatchet aka

Posted on 29-05-2014 18:56 | By ROCCO

Another little secret squirrel deal hatched behind closed doors - a cemetery for godssake.Do these people have nothing better to do with their time and OUR money.


Theodorus

Posted on 29-05-2014 20:45 | By Theodorus

The Maori did not have any money to pay the fine for what it cost the British government to uphold the British law for all the British subjects [WE ARE ALL ONE PEOPLE!]at that time.So the only compensation option was to take some land.Full stop!


Excellent

Posted on 30-05-2014 07:17 | By hakihana

Well done in having the CONFISCATED land returned to nga hapu, we can celebrate this wonderful occasion.


This cemetery land

Posted on 30-05-2014 07:49 | By Fonzie

Was purchased by the church missionary society on 30 September 1838 from local Maori 25 years before Gate Pa and was never confiscated from anyone


What's sauce for the goose . .

Posted on 30-05-2014 09:00 | By The author of this comment has been removed.

In theory I own a piece of land in Tauranga. I am responsible for it's upkeep, lawns mowed, berm tidy etc. I also pay rates for this ownership. I now expect that the upkeep of this land is now not a council responsibility, but one of local iwi. I also expect that they will pay rates, just like I do.


gone

Posted on 30-05-2014 09:04 | By dumbkof2

mabee now they can bury all their so called claims


Not confiscated

Posted on 30-05-2014 09:30 | By JohnHeb

The land was "bought" by CMS in 1838 and 1839. There is disagreement around what "bought" means.It was where Alfred Nesbit Brown built his mission station. In part he bought it to ensure some land was retained for Maori if the settlers got this far. After the Battles of Pukehinahina and Te Ranga CMS was forced by the government to give that land to the government for a military settlement. They kept 20% as payment. This land was administered by the Trust. The Treaty meant Maori were not conquered. They invited us here. It meant they were to be treated as british subjects. These battles were about Maori not being willing to sell anymore land for use by settlers. This one law Theodorus highlights should have protected them. Until we own our own immoral history we cannot move on. I celebrate that this peice of land is returned.


PMS..

Posted on 30-05-2014 12:52 | By awaroa

Poor Me Syndrome usual suspects.. Cheer up people. Today is a good day


Thank you Fonzie

Posted on 30-05-2014 15:45 | By Murray.Guy

A little Google search and we have a New Zealand History On-line which clearly conflicts with 'hakihana and the bold reference to confiscation'. I can hear the keys clicking as efforts are made to further perpetuate myths and legends, bias and racism ... http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/media/photo/tauranga-mission-cemetery


Painful truths,

Posted on 02-06-2014 20:23 | By robin bell

JohnHeb is correct.According to the CMS parent committee--"Te Papa was "acquired" and retained under solemn trust,for the benefit of the native race. That it should never be bartered or sold for the mere purpose of raising money.The natives who "GAVE" this land for the benefit of themselves and their posterity,would have "Just" cause for complaint against us if we sold that land for military settlement". Same old story Mr Guy. Confiscation by the Crown.The C.M.S intrduced Blue Law,one of which reads," Sacrifice all to god,Lay all upon his altar.Did this include the land Alfred Brown "bought"? Robin Bell.


Sorry mr Bell

Posted on 03-06-2014 13:26 | By Fonzie

You are incorrect The mission cemetery land was purchased on 30 September as part of the land for the mission station 39 Acres Te Papa block #1 from 17 Maori chiefs signed off and witnessed by James Slack The cemetery was Used by the whole community as Taurangas Only cemetery until the new cemetery was opened in the avenues It remained in community ownership until recently when it Was gifted into private Maori hands This land was not stolen or confiscated by anyone other than Maori I invite you to prove otherwise


On the contrary fonzie,

Posted on 03-06-2014 19:51 | By robin bell

tis you whats wrong.I do understand your desperation,it can't be easy trying to hold a position,with so few facts. My quotation on the other hand comes straight from the "horses mouth"so to speak.Direct from The Church Missionary Society,archives. The gospel and Tauranga N.Z.CMS.Alistair Rose,Mark Grace and Sophia Sinclair.I suggest you update your "information" You see fonze it was'nt theft by Maori at all.Its just a simple case of ignorance and denial by you. Robin Bell.


Who now looks after it??

Posted on 04-06-2014 15:50 | By Mary Faith

Let us hope then that Iwi will keep the sacred grounds in pristine condition - as have the council in preceeding years. Or - have they reached a deal where they 'own' and we ratepayers continue to pay for its upkeep - like the Mount! We never do hear the 'nitty gritty' of these agreements - I wonder why?


MR Bell

Posted on 04-06-2014 17:09 | By Fonzie

I think what you are describing is the situation regarding Te Papa Block#2 which has very conveniently been lumped together with Te Papa block #1 which is the land in question and to the best of my knowledge was a straight purchase now gifted to Maori


Chip and chase, fonzie

Posted on 05-06-2014 12:46 | By robin bell

and the balance of probability.Two blocks were "purchased" both by C.M.S. Alfred Brown. Purchase= to aquire other than by inheritance. What it does not specify is what payment is used. The C.M.S bought land all around the British Empire.The usual "price" was the promise of Salvation. If you can specify what price Alfred paid,I will concede. In any event the C.M.S. clearly feel Maori were let down badly, both by themselves and the Crown. Parliament agrees. Robin Bell.


The price paid

Posted on 05-06-2014 22:13 | By Fonzie

was the usual tokens of tools and goods etc with a proper witnessed document but the real price paid was the free education of Maori students in all manner of skills You can read all about it in the book Brown and the Elms by CW Vennell and a bibliography of Official and original sources in the back It makes a mockery of the claims by Te Ururoa Flavell and others The book is in the Tauranga library Page 39 refers There was no confiscation


Fonzie,needs a hand,

Posted on 09-06-2014 08:37 | By robin bell

The United Nations representing 7 billion people has roundly condemned such transactions,as immoral and exploitive,of indigenous peoples. People who had no idea of monetary values. People who were uneducated. Your defence of such deals,is indicative of your attitude to the injustice of the "confiscations" Your stubborn defence of a piddling point of order is quite pathetic. Robin Bell.


Mr Bell You and Mr Flavell

Posted on 10-06-2014 14:45 | By Fonzie

and others dishonestly referred to the cemetery land as a confiscation I am gratified that you now recognise it as a transaction There are lots of other words dishonestly used to advance separatism/apartheid by Maori interests as well but thats another story Injustices were done I have no doubt but not in every case Community owned and used cemetery land for 176 years has been privatised on the basis of lies here and sorry thats no piddling point of order Not in my book anyway


Fonzie

Posted on 11-06-2014 20:22 | By Te Ponui

a word you use irresponsibly and far more damaging to our nation. Apartheid? Pull the other one. You mislead much like Mary Brooks but Joe kiwi thankfully can see through it. The grievance process must proceed for the sake of all of us. Every claim must be tested. Be patient. Maori have waited for around 180 years. A couple more won't hurt you now will it.


Overit

Posted on 12-06-2014 12:43 | By overit

Te Ponui when will Claims ever end. Historical Treaty Claims closed in Sept. 2008.


How long

Posted on 12-06-2014 18:48 | By Te Ponui

is a piece of string? Only when all Iwi groups and Hapu groups have at least had there settlements will we have a clear picture of where we stand. Who knows, it could be sooner than you think? Enjoy our beautiful country. I think we are just fine in comparison to other countries like Zimbabwe. Be grateful but most of all patient.


Premature gratification,fonzie

Posted on 12-06-2014 19:47 | By robin bell

and an inability to face the truth,will not serve you well.The Crown confiscated the lot. Alfred Brown managed to negotiate retentsion of a small block including the cemetery. Under Customary law the land in question was never "sold" in the manner you so pedantically maintain. I suggest that before you call people dishonest,you educate yourself by googling The Gospel and Tauranga Moana. N.Z.C.M.S.read it all,with two eyes, and squirm. Dishonesty in this "discussion" is when people use words like Apartheid,seperatism and other equally rediculous diversions. Robin Bell.


Overit sums it up,

Posted on 13-06-2014 10:37 | By robin bell

your statement is incorrect.Historical claims were to be registered by 2008 and settled by 2014,now extended to give more time for proper investigation and discussion.As Te Ponui says be patient. Robin Bell.


Mr Bell

Posted on 13-06-2014 14:23 | By Fonzie

I am very comfortable with what I have written and the words used. You could perhaps google them yourself I believe they apply. Te Ponui I wish I had your confidence. I have said all now on this.


proper investigation

Posted on 13-06-2014 17:01 | By crazyhorse

Now that's a goody!!, explain proper investigation Robby, how's it work, if anyone can excuse and apologis their way out it will be you,this has been proved beyond doubt by the others commenting on this thread this land was procured legally, "maori got the land", that's all that counts to you, please don't bleat on about doing the right thing or "mana", it's about power and greed, I see your old mate Crosby ""our mayor"", yeah rite, is setting up a new trough just as Auckland and Chadwick in Rotorua, I don't know why Te Ururoa and co don't wait another 12 to 18 months then the boys on the board will gets you anything yous wants.


Power and greed,

Posted on 14-06-2014 10:05 | By robin bell

Auckland,Rotorua,Tauranga who's next crazy? Looks like your worst nightmare is happening. Your "inventive,revisionist,amateur so-called intellectuals are taking a real beating.Couldn't happen to a "nicer" bunch. Robin Bell.


ignorant murray guy and co.

Posted on 23-06-2014 19:17 | By hakihana

Read the damn article murray and open ur failing eyes! The land was confiscated it is written in very plain english, like many other lands were confiscated, stop trying to play down the facts its pathetic, exactly what is your problem murray other than the obvious.


RING A LING DING DONG

Posted on 23-06-2014 22:32 | By ROCCO

Are you suggesting the Missionaries appeared with their bibles spoke to the locals said lets us pray and when the bozos opened their eyes they had the bibles and the missionaries had the land OMG.


Murray's problem

Posted on 24-06-2014 09:52 | By robin bell

is that he's a budding politician. As such he thinks it prudent to play both sides.If or when he gets elected, his attitude will no doubt change.You must be used to that by now Hakihana. Robin Bell.


Hakahani

Posted on 24-06-2014 10:24 | By YOGI BEAR

Perhaps it was, like much else and that includes land, life and limb of many. The land side of things is where most was returned, some was not for various reasons and that did include the unprevoked attacked by Maori on the settlors and others including other Maori. The red coats eventually moved to quell the attacked which they dis complete. In end result and as known to Maori before they started that land would go to the government if there was trouble. So as night follows day the end result was to be expected.


Yoghurt Bear

Posted on 25-06-2014 16:51 | By hakihana

"Most was returned" is what you have said in reference to confiscated land, um Where!!! Honestly is that the dribble you tell yourself to help you sleep better at night, i mean you even have access to Google, a plethora of knowledge and information and you make a statement such as yours, oh how the mind boggles. Quite right Robin, Murray is a game player that is for certain and Murray please don't visit anymore of our ceremonial gatherings, I actually stood next to you the other day on ground that my tupuna are buried under and it means nothng to you and it won't either.


There is little doubt,Hakihana

Posted on 26-06-2014 08:30 | By robin bell

that yogi bore is deluded.He takes his lead from the few extremists in this country.He does use google,but only to further his prejudice via E. local and one n.z. foundation.(What a contradiction in terms that is). Now he's telling us he's offended by my support for Maori rights and representation. Tuff!!! Robin Bell.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.