Growers can change industry

Kiwifruit growers have the power to change their industry if that's what the majority wish, says the president of New Zealand Kiwifruit Growers Inc.

Sun shines through the vines of a kiwifruit orchard.

'The current structure of the kiwifruit industry has been chosen by growers – the majority of growers. If the majority of growers want to make changes to their industry, they can and will,” says Neil Trebilco.

He is responding to calls from the Independent Kiwifruit Growers Association Inc that NZKGI endorse its call to stop what IKGA describes as 'the continued privatisation of public good funded kiwifruit varieties and to seek to have those varieties, along with the Zespri brand, put into a trust for the benefit of all kiwifruit growers and NZ Inc”.

Ross Hart of IKGA says: 'Taxpayer funding was responsible for establishing the kiwifruit variety breeding programme that produced the successful Hort 16A [Gold] kiwifruit variety. A further $35.7 million has been given by the Government to a joint venture between Plant and Food Research and Zespri to breed new kiwifruit varieties”.

'If the kiwifruit industry is deregulated those kiwifruit varieties could end up in foreign ownership, as happened with apple varieties when the Germans took over ENZA,” say Ross.

'We think that the exclusive licences that we understand Zespri has, in respect of each of its new varieties, should be put into a trust for growers – and not held by Zespri.”

But Neil says growers have the chance to have a say on the shape of their industry's future through the current Kiwifruit Industry Strategy Project.

'This project is far reaching in its scope as we look to how the industry, including our marketer, needs to be focused for the future to maximise grower returns. During the consultation phases of the Kiwifruit Industry Strategy Project, I would encourage all growers to make their views known,” says Neil.

'New Zealand Kiwifruit Growers Inc is the mandated grower body, which represents the more than 2600 growers in the New Zealand kiwifruit industry, who voted overwhelmingly [87 per cent yes vote] to fund NZKGI with a levy to represent their interests.

'To the best of my knowledge, Mr Hart and Mr Ted Meade [also of IKGA] have no mandate to speak on behalf of the industry. As with all growers, their views will be listened to – but claims they have wide industry support are not backed up,” says Neil, who also says all growers 'are encouraged to make submissions to the Kiwifruit Industry Strategy Project”.

But Ross says that as far as IKGA is concerned, the Zespri brand is held on trust by Zespri for New Zealand and New Zealand growers – not for the exclusive benefit of Zespri shareholders.

'Did growers who have paid about $1 a tray each year for the development of the Zespri brand through promotional spending – that is about $100 million each year – think that they did not have ownership of the brand?”

Ross says that, based on figures in Zespri's annual review and report, 25 per cent of growers own 75 per cent of the shares in Zespri.

'There are 895 of the 2700 New Zealand growers [30 per cent of growers] who have no shares in Zespri but are compelled by law to export through Zespri and have no say in the way that their fruit returns are dealt with by Zespri.

'It is simply wrong, in our view, that Zespri shareholders – and not growers – own both the Zespri brand and taxpayer-funded kiwifruit varieties. With deregulation of the kiwifruit industry is a future possibility these valuable intellectual property rights could be lost to New Zealand and New Zealand kiwifruit growers forever,” says Ross. 'Growers, not Zespri shareholders, have paid for the Zespri brand and taxpayers have funded the Zespri kiwifruit varieties.”

12 comments

IKGA

Posted on 10-11-2013 13:04 | By I.K.G.A.

IKGA has never claimed a mandate to speak for all growers. IKGA does claim the right to free speech on kiwifruit industry issues.In 1988 Growers were told by then Minister of Agriculture McIntyre that if they did not vote to create the KMB the government would do it for them "for their own good". Minister Luxton who oversaw the Producer Board Reforms of the late 1990's refused to allow the assets of the KMB to be transferred to Zespri if it was a co-op. Growers voted in 1999 on a reform package.They did not vote on the "industry structure" and there has been no similar secret ballot vote since. Mr Trebilco is wrong to claim otherwise. His Strategy project is doomed to fail to produce a strategy if that is his attitude. He is allready on record saying they will disregard submissions they do not like or "deem irrelevant".


toys out of the cot

Posted on 11-11-2013 11:52 | By rooster

Just to let all the sunlive readers know, this is about money and power, the IKGA guys, (who and how many there are we growers don't know, cause they are secret squirrel) are always throwing their toys out of the cot, this is because they want to have the money and the power. Currently this lies with the majority of the growers and it works well, why would growers change? as the ikga wont tell us how many and who their growers are we can only assume that that they represent a minimum of growers, 5 at the most from what I can pick out, so the other 2695 growers say front up or shut up and let us go back to growing our kiwifruit out of Psa.


I.K.G.A Whoops

Posted on 12-11-2013 02:19 | By Young Grower

Marcus Wilkins quoted in Sunlive 1 November 2013: Claims growers fear intimidation 'Look at it another way - IKGA represents the 75 per cent of growers who own 25 per cent of the shares in Zespri'. Too funny. The 5 of them cant even get their stories straight.


Grower

Posted on 12-11-2013 09:19 | By grower

What I dont understand is, if Zespri and its affiliated groups of NZ Kiwifruit Growers Inc and Neil Trebilco say that they welcome input from growers, why are they on such a witch hunt against the IKGA growers ? Surely they are a voice that should be listened to ? What is Neil Trebilco trying to hide ? I think they protest too much. Sure seems to me that the little group that controls everything are doing pretty well for themselves?


change to apples

Posted on 12-11-2013 11:08 | By marcus

How bout the 5 or so growers change to growing apples, least you can stop complaining and have your own peace of mind!


IKGA

Posted on 12-11-2013 22:01 | By I.K.G.A.

For a Society to become incorporated it must have at least 15 members. This is a matter of public record a few clicks away on the roosters computer and is not secret. Rooster obviously is still in the womb if he or she thinks growers control the industry. When did he/she last analyse the industry structure or read the statistics in a Zespri annual report. It is a fact that 25% of growers own 75% of the shares in Zespri.Notably, rooster, young grower and marcus all talk about IKGA fronting up but do not post their names nor debate the issues or even suggest a secret ballot to test grower support for the status quo. Perhaps they are among the 25% of growers who hold 75% of the shares in Zespri protecting their legislated privilege. They need to learn to play the ball not the player.


IKGA

Posted on 13-11-2013 14:14 | By goldenjade

To rooster,and young grower.What this industry needs is a secret ballot so all the growers that feel they would be intimidated by zespri could vote with out fear of reprisal. This should be growers right in a democratic country .The board has forgot what governance is about.And if you don't think this is correct you should both waddle back into your cave and play with your BONES


kftop

Posted on 13-11-2013 22:34 | By kftop

It may be worth pointing out the average grower is mid to late 60's in age and chances are they have passed resposabilities on to packhouses.IKGA has many more than "5" growers. There support is growing daily. These are predomontly "hands on " growers that have real concerns for our industries future.We do not grow the best varieties, they exist overseas and are unobtainable due to Zespris current hold on their variety release and inflence in quarentine decisions/restrictions


Stats

Posted on 14-11-2013 19:38 | By rooster

well stats are a great thing, they can be twisted to say all sorts of things. You don't have to look very hard to find that yes 75% of the shares are owned by 25% of the growers. However 77% of the trays produced are by those same 25% of growers. See stats can be fun. By the way I am a small grower, I had to sell my few shares to keep food on the table for my family due to psa. so play the ball not the player.


IKGA

Posted on 15-11-2013 08:45 | By I.K.G.A.

Rooster should post the source of his stats. Zespri has refused to release such information to IKGA. In any case, he or she still does not debate the issues. Rooster may well be happy to allow the industry to be controlled by 25% of the growers. The taxpayer,however, did not agree to tax dollars spent on new varieties being appropriated in this way and the Producer Board Reform Team specifically warned of the dangers of this situation in 1999 and told the government that a review would be required in the "near term". That was 14 years ago. Rooster is not alone in suffering from PSA. He or she should ask why Zespri paid Italian growers $3 million in 2008 and 9 but did not sit on MPI , did no scientific literature review on PSA and had no contingency plans for an incursion.


Wheres the Proof

Posted on 15-11-2013 12:11 | By lmm

That's all very well KFTOP but where is the proof of any such support or any hint of evidence that the "best varieties"are still off shore. Words are cheap and sometimes very destructive when on a crusade to further ones personal agenda. Hands on growers like myself don't want a bar of it. Look to the Australian market place and the poor returns out of there due to multi desk exporters.


kftop

Posted on 20-11-2013 22:03 | By kftop

I support single desk "Imm"But sadly under the current corporate structure we are not getting the best market price. Having traveled extensively and looked at kiwifruit orchards and the way they market and package their fruit we have a lot to learn. Zespri has now earnt an arrogant "we know best attitude" overseas . We now have G3 which is not an early variety. If you were to have a similer variety some 5 weeks earlier [they do exist] ,then the local economy would be 100-200 mill better off. Look at the way the small 16 A was handled this year in a market desperate for what is now and will be a rear item.I dont belong to the Independant grower group and see myself in middle ground. We can only hope they are wrong, only the current fraud equiries will clear any doubt. China fallout will be huge,


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.