A key agreement enabling the redevelopment of the Papamoa Surf Life Saving Club on the beachfront at the Papamoa Domain is agreed to by the Tauranga City Council.
Council yesterday gave the nod to support the redevelopment of the clubhouse, overriding concerns expressed by council staff about the ability of the reserve to cater for further development.
Papamoa Surf Life Saving Club is set to be redeveloped from its current clubhouse into a rectangle clubhouse lying parallel to the beach.
The club is seeking to replace the decaying 400m2 building with a 2147m2 two storey building.
The shape of the club's leased area is to be altered to a rectangle lying parallel to the beach, instead of the current 1590m2 lease, which goes back from the beach. The area is reduced to about 1150m2, but it makes room for the new clubhouse design.
Council staff raised concerns over the impact of the redevelopment on the dune reserve and a claim the proposal will require 100 car parks.
But councillors were supportive of the development with Terry Molloy asking where members currently park, while Murray Guy asked if the Mount and Omanu Clubs are required to meet the same provisions as council staff claim are required.
Architect's perspective of the new Papamoa club house.
Staff says the issue is Papamoa Club is built on a reserve, even though it has an existing lease and building on that reserve.
Concerns expressed about the club's ability to pay for the new building are also part of that process. When a club builds on public land and cannot complete payment or maintain the building the responsibility falls back on the ratepayers, says council general manager of strategy services, Christine Jones.
Councillors agreed with Terry Molloy's suggestion they agree to the lease, and the club can work though the other issues.
Mayor Stuart Crosby says the club's redevelopment is urgent as the Papamoa population is currently about 22,000 people and expected to grow to 40,000 – 50,000.
The expanded and modern facility will also give the club the opportunity to become known as the 'centre for excellence for surf life saving in New Zealand”, says Stuart.
The Papamoa Surf Life Saving Club was formed in 1990 in response to the growing Papamoa community and the need for a permanent surf life saving service at the popular Papamoa Domain.
The clubhouse was built in 1988-89, extended in 2001, and continues as the base for the club's operation that covers the 14.5kilometre stretch of coast from Frasers Papamoa to Marjorie Lane at the end of Papamoa East.
The building is now in a state of disrepair and unsuitable. The toilet and shower facilities are dysfunctional and unusable, the patrol tower structure is decaying, there are weather leaks and the storage is inadequate - requiring three containers, and some gear stored by Omanu Surf Life Saving Club.
From its construction the Papamoa Surf Club building has also been a community facility and home to the local Lions Club, Scouts, Girl Guides, Cubs and Brownies.
Those relationships are expected to continue in the new building, and in summer provide a summer base for St John Ambulance service.
In addition to badly needed storage, the new building will contain a watch control room, a St John paramedic centre, changing rooms, toilets, showers, a gym/training area, and multipurpose meeting and congregation areas for club members, community groups and other users, and a kitchen and bar area.



16 comments
About time
Posted on 28-08-2013 12:45 | By Leigh
These important facilities (at most popular beaches across NZ)should be fully Govt. funded (local or central).....after all what is the cost of the lives saved each year. Good decision TCC
Good to hear
Posted on 28-08-2013 13:03 | By rodgero52
GO PAP, show them how its done.
NAME THE COUNCILLORS
Posted on 28-08-2013 13:16 | By yikes61
who voted in favor of the development please. We already know the hopefully outgoing mayor is in favor, but this is pampering a few. Why do St John need a centre right on the dunes, why should there be a gym/training area and multipurpose room, kitchen and bar, Right on the dunes??? Councillors in favor are showing a total disregard of the New Zealand Coastal Policy statement and the environmental impact over social wants (not needs). Build on the existing footprint of leasehold land if you can get the funds together. I hope the arrogance of the councillors and those putting forward this want, are not embarking on the road to high legal costs in pursuit of self indulgence.
why the hassle
Posted on 28-08-2013 13:54 | By hapukafin
why was the council so concerned about the finances of the surf club when they cant control their own budget with rate payers money
Surf Club
Posted on 28-08-2013 17:07 | By annieo
Get over yourself Yikes61!!
Good luck, but expect ratepayers to pay
Posted on 28-08-2013 17:44 | By Phailed1
It will be nice to have a better facility and it's ok to hack into dunes for some projects I think. We all need to get behind the proposal and help with fundraising etc. But I don't think there should be a pub or cafes on the site to compete with other ratepaying businesses. That would be clearly unfair.
Short term thinking
Posted on 28-08-2013 23:24 | By WS_1
I'm a volunteer lifeguard myself, but I think this is a short sited move. Yes, a new club is needed, but building this close to the beach is never a good idea. One only need to look at the example of the Muriwai surf club, and the numerous surf clubs in Australia which have had to be shifted due to inevitable coastal erosion. The new club should be built a lot further back from the beach. Otherwise, in decade or two the club is going to be unusable again.
Should
Posted on 28-08-2013 23:38 | By Capt_Kaveman
have been accepting donations last year as it is just as important to locals and visitors alike,why not get a community fundraiser together as why should this be just a council problem, the kitchen is ok but not sure why it needs a bar area
Priority
Posted on 29-08-2013 08:02 | By RawPrawn
Every summer tens of thousands of people come to the Western Bay, principally because of our beautiful beaches and the associated culture. The safety of these visitors is preserved by many volunteers, SLSC and St Johns included, and it's the absolute least the Council can do to provide a decent facility. This decision is long overdue - thankfully it's election year!!
Councillors named and funding
Posted on 29-08-2013 09:10 | By Murray.Guy
The decision was unanimous. The community is unlikely aware that the critical role carried out by the individual surf life saving clubs is not at ratepayer cost, unlike rugby, netball, cricket, art galleries and the like. The Papamoa Club is looking to continue to provide their services to the community, to add to the lives of the youth in the region free of ratepayer dependency. It seems to me that a not for profit community organisation (such as the surf life savers) located on beach reserve has a greater right of occupancy than a commercial restaurant and holiday park if one was forced to prioritise. The beach side dune location for a surf life saving club is obviously critical to carrying out it's role, logical, reasonable. Unlike a 3.5 meter bulldozed cycleway through the adjacent dunes, again supported by the majority of elected members earlier this week.
bigger picture
Posted on 29-08-2013 10:16 | By yikes61
Good to see that voluntary lifeguards (WS_1) can see a greater picture than local wants on prime coastal land and people after votes at the expense of greater impacts. Cllr. Guy, (thanks for your response), why would those in attendance. vote to build, against the advice of those more knowledgeable on the subject and why would you agree to build on coastal hazard zones.The beach side location is the best place for observation towers but not a community hall, bar , gym etc.. these are luxuries voluntary clubs would dream of. Council plans must give effect to the Coastal Policy Statement 2010. Objective 1 is to safegaurd the integrity, form, functioning and resilience of the coastal environment and sustain its ecosystems including dunes. Annie0, do you have a view or structural critique?
all can remain Cr Guy
Posted on 29-08-2013 10:44 | By Phailed1
No need to prioritise. There can be a lease paying restaurant and campground at Papamoa and a surf lifesaving clubrooms. After all your big spending council needs plenty of income to pay for all its various schemes. But be prepared for Council to pay to get this thing up and running. Be fair and don't expect them to run businesses from the site in competition with other ratepayers.
What's the difference?
Posted on 29-08-2013 19:52 | By Murray.Guy
Mostly all of the recreational clubs from various sporting codes have facilities (licensed, catering, space for hire) that include exactly the same facilities proposed by the Papamoa Surf Live Savers. All are on ratepayer reserve land. I'm curious why we have folk who would choose to undermine Papamoa live savers? The zone requires the building be able to be relocated within 14 days. The proposed design and construction methodology accommodates this. Where self indulgence by Councillors comes into this discussion is way beyond me. In regards advise from those more knowledgeable - The advice was from staff, totally removed from an understanding of Surf life Saving needs, and construction in sensitive zones. The club has accountants, architects, engineers and builders! Can't be more expert than that!
We need to plan for the future - because nature will win
Posted on 30-08-2013 20:50 | By WS_1
Agreed @yikes61 - Beaches and dune systems are dynamic and constantly shifting, sometimes seaward and sometimes eroding landward. In most places this is a natural process with little impact on human settlement. However, it can cause major and expensive problems, and in almost all these cases it's related to human encroachment on the shoreline. So many surf clubs in NZ and Australia have had to be rebuilt or moved in the last few decades (St Clair's club in Dunedin is currently threatened). Why are we still making the same mistakes? Let's build a fantastic club (with facilities for the whole community) a little further back, and use a mobile or semi-permanent patrol tower on the beach. Many clubs in NZ successfully use this approach.
Development by stealth.
Posted on 23-11-2014 09:15 | By marshamaxw
I have a volunteer guard at Papamoa. I don't think they need a clubhouse. The surf club has over-reached itself by selling itself, this is nothing to do with surflifesaving, they want bigger building to show off .If they want a building, why not purchase the Biyou and get the council to grant them the lease.There is going to be new eating places in the new development across from the domain.We suffer a glut of eating places in bop,they don't produce many jobs for the economic and is not a wealth producing jobs for making contribution to substain our present standard of living. This is development by stealth. There will council giving jobs for it's friends in construction. a money making venue.The reality is that surflifesaving is seasonal and amount of use doesn't justify the cost. Build a new clubhouse,away from the beach,rescinding the lease inside reserve.
Picture gives false impression
Posted on 25-11-2014 00:02 | By marshamaxw
The picture is of the rear.The most objectional thing about it is how long the beach facing side is, 50m that is ridiculous.These are Tauranga interests being inflicted on us by Tauranga people.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.