Snapper debate intensifies

Despite three public information sessions outlining the Ministry of Primary Industries proposed changes to snapper quotas the public is still left with a sour taste in their mouth.

On Thursday around 300 people turned out for the third and final national MPI information meeting at the Coastguard building – but were left disappointed.


Last month, MPI released a paper outlining three options for snapper regulations in SNA 1, which spans the Bay of Plenty, Hauraki Gulf and East Northland – and could see the recreational snapper limits slashed from nine to just three per person.

The release opens up a six-week consultation process for recreational and commercial fishermen to debate who should be responsible for replenishing the fishery.

Thursday's meeting follows the two meetings in Whangarei and Parnell, Auckland.

Attending the meeting was Independent Tauranga MP Brendan Horan who says people were left angry and disappointed in what was a one-sided presentation.

'People went there expecting to be able to have dialogue and instead they got posters and MPI staff talking to the posters,” says Brendan.

'I spoke to MPI staff and it's not their fault that they are only doing their bidding. But my concern is the Government is going to turn around and say ‘we ran consultation all over new Zealand'.”

Snapper 1 is New Zealand's most popular recreational fishery and is the country's fifth-most-valuable commercial fishery by asset value.

According to MPI, proposed recreational options include reducing bag limits from nine to three, increasing the minimum legal size from 27cm to 35cm, or opting for a combination of the two.

With no allocated time for feedback from the fishermen themselves, the sessions lack balance, debate or a cost benefit analysis of New Zealand recreational fishers, says Brendan.

'What has happened is quite heavy handed and commercial fishermen are unhappy and so are recreational and the only ones that are happy are the big players like Sandfords'.”

He believes the Government is not looking at the bigger picture with more than the fishers being punished – including boat makers, tackle and game shops and the tourism and accommodation industry.

'It's a billion dollar industry and none of that has been put up. It's terribly one sided and all three options punish recreational fishers.”

After putting his petition online on Thursday, the signatures are beginning to gain momentum with 900 added just online in 24 hours. In two weeks' time he will present the signatures to Parliament opposing the MPI proposals.

LegaSea spokesperson Mandy Kupenga is adamant commercial exploitation of snapper resources alienates the public from an important food source if proposed management changes are implemented.

LegaSea is a population-based advocacy group concerned with keeping fish stocks at a sustainable level for future generations.

'Many families are struggling to put decent food on the table and if the Ministry goes ahead with their plans then there will be more hardship, especially in the regions,” says Mandy.

'What we're facing is a loss of fundamental rights, a loss of income for business owners, and importantly a loss of food on the table for families.”

She says it is ludicrous all of the main options proposed mean massive cuts to recreational catch while abhorrent dumping of hundreds and thousands of undersized snapper occurs each year – by the commercial sector.

When contacted by SunLive, the Ministry of Primary Industries was unable to be reached for comment.

To further help people understand what's at stake and answer questions LegaSea is holding a series of public meetings throughout the snapper 1 region starting in Whakatane on the 5th of August and finishing in Auckland on the 15th of August.

More information can be found at http://www.legasea.co.nz/ while to send a submission head to http://www.legasea.co.nz/snapper1.php

To sign Brendan's petition click here.

12 comments

No surprises

Posted on 03-08-2013 10:55 | By penguin

There are no surprises here with regard to "consultation." The tactics used are typical of this government's less-than-hidden agendas. One only has to look at the debacle over the Christchurch schools' 'consultation” process and the GCSB issue as models. The tactic reflects the intention of government to implement policy regardless of what general public opinion indicates. Good old arrogant, autocratic government at work!


Unfair

Posted on 03-08-2013 13:23 | By Lala

Recreational fishers should never have their limits cut on any fish, they do not depleat the fish from the waters, it is the commercial fishers that catch hundreds and thousands that is the problem! cut their limits


Auckland starting point?

Posted on 03-08-2013 14:36 | By Graham

Many recreational fishers I know already set their own snapper size restrictions.My boat has a 30cm minimum,many others are higher.I feel I am doing my bit so why does Auckland get away with a miserable 25cm limit? What is that doing to snapper stocks?


Rec fisherman

Posted on 03-08-2013 15:00 | By holly

Time to cut the commercial guys they are the ones dumping the undersize snapper. Most rec guys only take 300mm and above. Sounds like the big cheque books taking control again


mass protest

Posted on 03-08-2013 15:05 | By sonicchick

Maybe all boat owners should hook up their boats and go for a drive along the motorway at once....would get alot of publicity...


Rastus

Posted on 03-08-2013 15:36 | By rastus

I know some will read this and snigger 'but' not only the public but the department staff do not realise that this legislation is just another part of a much bigger agenda - you can laugh again when I say that 'Agenda 21' yes that thorny old subject has far more to do with this that an actual 'alleged' shortage of fish stocks brought about by recreational fishers. Slowly but surely all food stocks will be under the control of governments who will profess that they are doing it for the good of the people when in fact it has nothing to do with looking after anyone else except the evil intentions of those at the top, supported by the UN to eventually have a one world order. It is happening so slowly that you are not noticing it but think about how things such as your energy supplies, electricity and gas, your water supplies etc etc are slowly ending up in the hands of a few at the expense of the masses. Fortunately I will have moved on by the time it gets real tough.


Think laterally

Posted on 03-08-2013 15:38 | By michael_l_c

For a few years (with a sunset clause) restrict snapper catches during 2 months of the breeding season. Create a restriction area eg. from Mangawhai Heads around Gt Barrier down to the Mercury Islands and back to Opito Bay. During the restriction, no commercial snapper fishing in the area and halve the recreational limit. At the end of the restricted period back to 'normal' catch limits. By all means increase the size limit for Ak, the current limit isn't worth eating or think laterally and don't have a size limit. Better that some idiot takes a limit of small fish rather than breeders! Commercial fisherman to land 100% of catch as part of quota, if it is caught it has to be used.


Not Surprised

Posted on 03-08-2013 16:30 | By Jitter

I dont' know about NZ becoming a republic but we are certainly very quickly becoming a dictatorship.


submit

Posted on 03-08-2013 23:03 | By Fishabunga

The best way to oppose these cuts is to support LegaSea and send in a submission through them.


Surfcasters,

Posted on 04-08-2013 07:44 | By Stevo

Although recreational fisherpersons can often easily catch their limit and 30cm+ fish are often caught, spare a thought for the land based angler who more often than not will catch nothing and 27cm is a realistic size to be landed. Decreasing the limit to 3 snapper will not make any difference to what he/she takes home, but increasing the size certainly will.


Not Fair

Posted on 04-08-2013 16:57 | By mike j

I think boat owners should get together and anchor their boats in a line so the commercial fishermen can't get out of the harbour, if we cant feed the local people then why should we send our snapper overseas and I think all local restaurants should take snapper off their menus.


Not Fair

Posted on 04-08-2013 16:57 | By mike j

I think boat owners should get together and anchor their boats in a line so the commercial fishermen can't get out of the harbour, if we cant feed the local people then why should we send our snapper overseas and I think all local restaurants should take snapper off their menus.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.