A landlord’s final inspection of a house revealed some surprises, including baseball bats and chains under the beds and couches, modifications to the garage, and a flatmate still living there with his dog.
The landlord, whose name is suppressed, provided the Tenancy Tribunal with photographs of the house to show tenant Jessica Michelle Duffy made no attempt to clean it before she left in February this year.
The landlord described the state of the house as squalid, which the tribunal accepted.
“Cupboards were still full, dishes were piled in the sink and bench, the bathroom still had personal items, furniture was still in all the rooms, and the woodshed was piled with a tremendous amount of rubbish.
“Baseball bats and chairs were found under the beds and couches. The wood burner was loaded with the remnants of burnt aluminium cans and glass bottles.
“The bathroom required an immediate application of Exit Mould and personal items removed with gloves before being considered hygienic enough for occupancy and professional cleaners.”
During an inspection on January 28, the landlord also discovered a missing downpipe and a broken window in one of the rooms.
Despite being asked in writing to make repairs before mid-February, Duffy made no effort to do so, the decision said.
In another room, four large rectangles had been cut into the carpet, destroying it. The carpet also had suspected paint stains that couldn’t be removed.
As well as the damaged carpets, there was a strong smell of cigarettes, ash and dog throughout all the rooms. As a result, the landlord decided to replace the carpet and sought a contribution from the tenant.
The garage had been heavily carpeted and the walls and windows boarded up and lined with underlay and black material.
While the flatmate removed the wall lining, an extensive quantity of boards, material, carpet, underlay, rubbish and personal effects remained in the garage. The garage door was also broken and had to be replaced, because it had been levered open.
The recently released decision also noted that because the keys weren’t returned, the locks had to be replaced and the lawn needed to be mowed.
In its decision, the tribunal accepted the landlord’s claim that the clean-up required two skip bins and “many hours of stressful and disgusting work” shifting the tenant’s rubbish and possessions, although the decision notes the flatmate also helped.
Taking into account betterment and depreciation, the tribunal ordered that Duffy, who didn’t attend the hearing, pay $4822 to the landlord for the costs they’d incurred.
That included rent arrears, rubbish removal, replacing carpet, curtains, and repairs to the window and downpipe, garage door, and replacement locks.
Catherine Hutton is an Open Justice reporter, based in Wellington. She has worked as a journalist for 20 years, including at the Waikato Times and RNZ. Most recently she was working as a media adviser at the Ministry of Justice.





6 comments
Good luck...
Posted on 06-08-2025 12:14 | By fair game
bet you don't see a cent of the money owed to you. Oh wait - it'll get paid back at 50 cents per week.....
No money or satisfaction in being a landlord with tenants like these around.
Getting the money?
Posted on 06-08-2025 13:17 | By Bananarama
The landlord's chance of getting the money is probably zilch. Bad tenants never have any money.
GOOD LUCK
Posted on 06-08-2025 17:53 | By glass1/2 full
.... with getting a cent back ! Oh dear the poor soul ! I'm almost glad it's confirmed my worst fears of investing in rentals. I bet the "sub human" will cry "hard done by" and the state will provide a lovely new home to wreck. This person gives all good tenants a bad name
Nightmare Tenants
Posted on 07-08-2025 08:05 | By Thats Nice
And people wonder why landlords don't rent out their houses.
How much?
Posted on 07-08-2025 12:06 | By Duegatti
Under $5k for all that?
Was the court hearing in 1975?
This is the result...
Posted on 07-08-2025 13:24 | By morepork
...when the society de-values respect, courtesy, integrity and decency. Anyone brought up in a decent home, where they would have had a clip round the ear for showing such disrespect and contempt, simply wouldn't allow such disgusting behaviour. The fact that some of our population have no such guidelines, and allow their laziness and disrespect to create such an environment is reprehensible.
I don't blame investment property owners for withdrawing their dwellings from the market.
It's the old story: a small minority ruin it for the majority of good tenants who take responsibility for how they live.
I believe the culprit should have been required to work for a cleaning company for a period of time (maybe as community service?) until the landlord received the imposed fine amount.
She needs to change her mind about what she thinks is OK.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.