1:54:57 Tuesday 23 September 2025

Ōmokoroa locals protest toilet near memorial seat

Dennis Moller says the council did not inform him of plans to build a toilet when it helped install the memorial seat. Photo / Haley Doig

A protest disrupted the start of construction of a new public toilet in Ōmokoroa’s Precious Family Reserve.

Police asked protesters to leave the site on Wednesday morning. The Bay of Plenty Times understands there was also a protest on Tuesday.

Police said all attendees were well-behaved and no issues were reported.

The unisex toilet was included in the publicly consulted 2018 Precious Family Reserve Concept Plan, which stated that stormwater investigations might affect its location.

The council later moved the toilet’s planned site to avoid other underground pipes and storage tanks. Putting it elsewhere in the reserve would increase the cost from about $80,000 to $130,000.

Its new site is near a memorial seat built in remembrance of Kristy Moller, who died in 2015.

Kristy’s father, Dennis Moller, said he was incredibly disappointed with the council’s lack of sensitivity in this situation.

“This is a spiritual nature for me. My wife and I find it offensive to have a toilet in such close proximity to the seat.”

Moller said they chose the reserve for the memorial because of its peace and beauty. It was close to their home, so they could visit every day and remember their daughter.

Ōmokoroa resident Rob Mitford-Burgess, who took part in the protest, said residents were not made aware that the toilet had been shifted from its planned location.

“If they built it where they said they were going to build it, it would’ve been fine.”

Western Bay of Plenty District Council infrastructure group acting general manager Peter Watson said he acknowledged the difficulty of the situation and was open to talking with the Moller family.

“We understand this is upsetting for the Moller family, and we acknowledge the strong feelings they have about the memorial seat and its location.

“Council staff contacted the Mollers and offered to relocate the memorial seat at no cost; however, we understand the family does not want the seat moved.”

Watson said the concept plan indicated the toilet’s location would be determined after stormwater management investigations were completed.

Protesters at the site of construction of the new toilet. Photo / Haley DoigProtesters at the site of construction of the new toilet. Photo / Haley Doig

“We understand that people living near reserves feel a strong connection to these spaces and enjoy the peace, greenery, and views they offer.

“But, as public land, reserves are there for everyone, and they evolve and change to meet the growing needs of a community.”

Construction of the toilets was postponed after a public meeting in February to give residents time to prepare a petition in opposition.

Watson said the council received and considered the petition in a meeting of the projects and monitoring committee in June, which voted 8-3 in favour of installing the toilet in the consented location.

Councillors Margaret Murray-Benge and Tracey Coxhead have called for the council to urgently reconsider the decision and to move the toilet.

Alternative options include relocating the toilet within the reserve, at an added cost of $50,000, or building it elsewhere in the district. Photo / Haley DoigAlternative options include relocating the toilet within the reserve, at an added cost of $50,000, or building it elsewhere in the district. Photo / Haley Doig

Murray-Benge said the protest was a consequence of the council not listening and upsetting the community.

“If they had listened in the first place, we wouldn’t be in this predicament.”

Watson said in a June media statement that it was challenging to find a balance between individuals’ viewpoints and the public need for infrastructure when making community decisions.

“We’re committed to delivering high-quality public infrastructure that supports wellbeing, access and amenity for everyone.

“The next step will be to focus on delivering the facility in alignment with the reserve’s concept plan and consent conditions …

“Feedback on the need for a toilet at the reserve was varied. However, the majority of submissions were in favour of the proposed location if it was demonstrated that it was needed.”

Haley Doig is a journalism student from AUT interning at the Bay of Plenty Times.

4 comments

Toilet

Posted on 22-07-2025 07:52 | By peter pan

Just don`t bother about the toilet and save the ratepayers.


@peter pan

Posted on 22-07-2025 15:49 | By morepork

Your suggestion does not address this problem in any way. I'm a Ratepayer, but if a toilet is needed then they should have a toilet. How can it be rocket science? The seat was there before the toilet, so the plan should have considered that.
We seem to have a complete lack of engagement or sensitivity with administrators generally, in Tauranga.
I believe it is because people are in power for the wrong reasons, and there is little or no answerability.
Expect protest and disruption if you just walk over people.


@morepork

Posted on 23-07-2025 16:57 | By This Guy

They offered to move the bench at not cost, what more could they do? I feel sorry for these people and their situation, but they don't own the park, they've been offered a compromise and have refused it. Putting the toilet elsewhere in the reserve would increase the cost by $50,000, am I not constantly reading people MOANING ABOUT RATES and the council wasting money here? The council can never win, no matter what they do...


@This Guy

Posted on 24-07-2025 13:08 | By morepork

I considered your response, but I don't think it addresses the REAL problem, which is a lack of engagement and empathy. People don't feel that the Council is working WITH them.
"They offered to move the bench at no cost, what more could they do?" They could've planned properly, explained that there would be a $50,000 cost to move the toilet, and shown some understanding... The family would probably have acquiesced.
3 councillors voted in favour of moving the toilet. As one of them noted, if there had been proper planning/consultation, the issue need not have arisen.
I take no issue with your other points, and I agree that it sometimes seems like whatever the Council do, is wrong. Do you think that would be the case if there was a good relationship and engagement with the public?
(I'll continue to moan about the Rates...:-))


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.