Tauranga residents’ satisfaction with council low

Residents who have lived in Tauranga for more than 10 years were the least satisfied with the council. Photo: John Borren/SunLive.

People's satisfaction with Tauranga City Council is low with just 32 per cent happy, according to a council survey.

Meanwhile the council's image and reputation is at 23 per cent, up from 19 per cent for the previous year.

The scores are part of the TCC Annual Residents' Survey 2021/2022.

The overall satisfaction rating of 32 per cent is the same as the previous year, but has steadily declined since 2019 when it was 66 per cent. In 2020 overall satisfaction was 51 per cent.

Satisfaction for those aged between 18-34 and 35-64 is 27 per cent but is significantly higher for those over 65 at 46 per cent for 2021/22.

Overall satisfaction for people who have lived in Tauranga for more than 10 years was much lower at 26 per cent, worse than those who had been there for less than two years, with 55 per cent of them satisfied.

Comments from residents who were dissatisfied included wanting more public consultation and for council to listen to and work for the people.

One specific comment was: 'Not happy. I do not think we get value for money with the rates we pay.”

Another commented: 'Tauranga City needs to tackle road congestion and also provide better parking options. People who cannot bike or walk do not seem to be catered for by a design team that is not prepared to listen.”

A satisfied resident commented: 'The current council is doing a fantastic job of moving Tauranga City forward. A museum is a must. I have lived here for 33 years and have not seen any of our artefacts relating to Tauranga or Bay Of Plenty history.”

One other says: 'Overall, since the commissioners have been in place, there is a positive change in the level of working to understand and plan for solutions to improve local issues.”

The commissioners Bill Wasley, Stephen Selwood, Shadrach Rolleston and commission chair Anne Tolley replaced the mayor and councillors in February 2021.

The survey says this was a 'divisive issue” amongst respondents.

'Image and reputation remains at relatively low levels following the large fall when the commissioners were appointed and remains a main area of focus for the residents,” the survey outlined.

'Trust, financial management, annual rates and leadership are the four areas of most importance and the lowest perception.”

To improve perception among the residents, commissioners and members of council need to continue rebuilding trust, the survey recommended.
Asked what the council thought had contributed to the results, Tolley replied: 'TCC is currently undertaking the most ambitious capital programme of works it has ever had.

'After many years of under investment we're playing catch-up; upgrading roads, water infrastructure, community amenities and building a comprehensive civic development.

'Unfortunately this also means disruption for the community, which may be impacting the satisfaction results.

'There are road cones everywhere across the city, a symbol of inconvenience, but also much needed investment.”

Current projects the council are undertaking includes the upgrade and addition of bus lanes and cycleways to Cameron Road, and building Te Manawataki o Te Papa, the $304m civic precinct in central Tauranga.

Commission chair Anne Tolley. Photo: John Borren/SunLive.

In terms of rebuilding trust, Tolley says: 'Actions speak louder than words.”

'Community trust will improve when they start seeing us deliver.

'Unfortunately some of our big projects will take many years, but already the feedback we've had on recent completed work has been fantastic.”

This includes Kulim Park, He Puna Manawa (Library and Customer Service Centre) and Pacific Park, she says.

Around 24 per cent of those dissatisfied with council say there needs to be more public consultation and for council to listen.

Responding to those concerns Tolley says: 'We [the commissioners] have spent a huge amount of time talking with the community since we came on board, but we appreciate we're not going to please everyone all of the time.”

'We have had to make some hard decisions to deliver the infrastructure that Tauranga desperately needs.

'Consultation and engagement has shown significant support on our big development decisions including the civic redevelopment and investing in community facilities.

'We will continue to engage on new projects, but also to be open and transparent when decisions have already been made.”

The council will also continuing to explore more direct forms of community engagement and decision making, she says.

Tolley gave the example of the Links Avenue Community Panel, which is a group of 12 volunteers tasked with finding a solution to the problems on Links Avenue caused by the cul-de-sac.

She says the council is investigating options for the survey to ensure it captured community sentiment as accurately as possible.

'Questions have not been changed for many years and need reviewing.”

The 2021/2022 survey canvassed 669 Tauranga residents by asking around 150 people selected at random the same questions in four waves throughout the year.

Tolley says the fresh sample at each wave meant they got to hear from more people.

Public Interest Journalism funded through NZ On Air

10 comments

Worthless

Posted on 23-01-2023 17:31 | By Slim Shady

Not surprising but it is such a small sample I would not put any value on the results either way. The cat with the cream will continue to spin and spin.


Tolley surely jokes

Posted on 23-01-2023 17:39 | By nerak

“Community trust will improve when they start seeing us deliver." Either jokes, or is dreaming. Nothing, absolutely nothing, would induce me to trust a bunch of overpaid clowns to trust them, ever.


No surprise.

Posted on 23-01-2023 18:21 | By The Professor

No surprise really. But, do you think those clowns in the Council care what we think? They just look forward to each hefty pay packet!!


Hmmm

Posted on 23-01-2023 23:18 | By Let's get real

Does this mean that there has been an accurate survey of the ratepayers undertaken...? Maybe the 65 that support spending millions of ratepayers money on museums to celebrate atrocities in battle couldn't be contacted for comment.


Not surprising

Posted on 24-01-2023 09:03 | By margaret mary

I wonder how many people they surveyed. If there was a smart young lawyer around he would be able to take the council to court over derilection of duty and also prosecute them under the RMA act. The stormwater stream in Papamoa is poisionous the council are leaving the weir open so it all goes out to sea. The lawns around the area are not getting regularly mown and so it goes on. There was a vote taken and the museum was voted against. Or has everybody forgotten


Rates

Posted on 24-01-2023 09:07 | By Kancho

Probably because for many ratepayers who have had substantial rate rises since the government appointed unelected four don't see improvement in their services or experience. Spending priorities are awry when basics like water storage are ignored while museums and battle sites are more important. The average ratepayers see their costs rise but not improvements . I can't think of anything that's better except the refurbished Greerton swimming pool. Certainly not the road surfaces or traffic flows but we shall see if Cameron road is better but somehow I see it being more as a slow moving queue. Shame for the businesses


They don't care

Posted on 24-01-2023 09:23 | By an_alias

They are getting paid massive amounts and the only thing they have delivered is RATES INCREASES ! I guess we have to pay for the "Fab 4" to live the life.


No kidding

Posted on 24-01-2023 10:20 | By The Sage

I appreciate some larger projects like roads have been left too long however continued disruption to the inner city shows poor planning. Tauranga has lost its soul. The Council needs to attend to the day to day running of the city. What blatant example of this is the parks and reserves which have become so unkempt. They have really taken their eye off the ball. Mowing regularly seems to be a thing of the past and, when they do, the parks are an even bigger mess with long grass left to dry like hay. Forget the museum and attend to grass roots, to put a phrase.


cycle lanes

Posted on 24-01-2023 11:41 | By Howbradseesit

I'm just focusing on the new cycle lanes in my comment, because thats what I see the council have done in recent times. I am a commuting cyclist and I want to say that the new lanes are ridiculous. I am not sure if cycles give way to cars or the other way round. I knew that before these lanes, if I was on the road, I was treated with the same respect as a vehicle and given way to. All this appears to have changed with the new lanes, so why would I use them - having to go up and down curbs and stopping for cars turning? Have the lanes made my commute easier? No. Have they made it safer? No - more confusing if anything. Have they made my ride more efficient? No. I'm not the only cyclist to feel this way.


Nobody asked me.

Posted on 24-01-2023 12:55 | By morepork

They would not have liked the response if they did. Did anyone ask YOU if you WANTED a $300 million CBD uplift BEFORE getting traffic flows sorted? What's YOUR opinion on Commissioner's remuneration (out of Rates funding)? (Don't worry, no one cares what YOU think anyway...). Certainly some ESSENTIAL maintenance to drains and infrastructure has been undertaken, but it HAD to be. We can't even console ourselves with the thought that we elected them... It is no wonder that people are frustrated. The Commissioners are doing what they think is best (and in line with their masters' government policy...) but there needs to be a much higher level of engagement on both planning and implementation. They should not be spending OUR money without listening to us.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.