$84m upgrade planned for Tauranga’s waterfront

The Tauranga Waterfront plans include replacing the current carpark with green space. Image: Supplied.

Plans for an $84 million rejuvenation of Tauranga's waterfront described as a 'hallelujah moment” have been approved.

At a meeting on Monday, Tauranga City Council commissioners adopted the Tauranga Moana Waterfront Plan.

The master plan includes The Strand carpark becoming an open green space with pōhutukawa, a new playground, Masonic Park upgraded and a walkway waterfront from Memorial Park to the city centre.

The Dive Crescent carpark will also be upgraded, the long empty waterfront exhibition space Cargo Shed will be refurbished and a new wharf constructed at the end of Wharf Street.

Of the $84.2 million, $43.8 million has been allocated through the $303m budget for the Civic Precinct rebuild.

The other $40.4m is budgeted as part of the wider civic development and will be funded through the long term plan.

An additional estimate of $16.5 million for a wharf in front of the Cargo Shed and The Strand South Reserve has yet to be budgeted for, as the projects have not been costed.

An aerial render of the Tauranga waterfront plans. Photo: Supplied.

The civic precinct Te Manawataki o Te Papa will include a new library, museum, civic whare (a venue for council and community meetings), an exhibition space and upgrading Baycourt Community and Arts Centre.

It will occupy the land between Wharf Street and Hamilton Street with improved connections to the waterfront.

Long-term resident and Tauranga City Council commissioner Bill Wasley said adopting the master plan was 'a bit of a hallelujah moment” because there had been plans made for the area since the 1990s.

Commissioner Bill Wasley. Photo: John Borren/SunLive.

Wasley liked that it had open green space and was 'practical and not laden down with massive building development” which is where earlier initiatives had 'ran aground”.

The connection to back to the moana was important too, he said.

'We are a city that has turned its back on the water and not used it for a long time in terms of access, amenity, just being able to see it.”

Wasley said it was also important that the entrance to the CBD from Dive Crescent was being improved as it been 'extremely average” for the 30 plus year he had been in the city.

Commissioner Stephen Selwood said it was an 'extremely exciting” project.

Commissioner Stephen Selwood. Photo: John Borren/SunLive.

'To think that we are now in position where we can move from just doing perpetual plans to actually funding and implementing one, I think is a major milestone for us and deserves to be celebrated,” he said.

'The master plan that we have here is both exciting and I think will be widely welcomed across the community, that finally we're doing something for the city that really makes a difference.”

Commission chair Anne Tolley said the waterfront was a fantastic part of Tauranga and 'the missing piece” was detailed plans for the $10.9m Masonic Park upgrade.

She said the plans were still being finalised and council was consulting with the businesses that face onto the park.

'We don't want that to be what it is today, which is just an open, empty wasteland ... that's what it resembles at times,” said Tolley.

The design was to incorporate the park into the civic precinct and pedestrianise Willow Street between the two spaces, she said.

Commission chair Anne Tolley. Photo: John Borren/SunLive.

'The intention is so that it'll be seamless and people will be able to move without vehicles between the civic site right down to the waterfront, through Masonic park.

'We are looking at how we keep that visual from the civic whare down to the moana, but at the same time provide green and shade and inviting places for people to be.”

Wasley wanted to ensure all the funding was 'resolved”.

'We don't want to go back in history and have a project that's only partially complete.”

Redevelopment of the Dive Crescent carpark and the Memorial Park to the city walkway were already underway.

A further $61.3m of projects identified in the plan include renewal of The Strand sea wall and Fisherman Wharf, and construction of a $50m transport hub.

These projects have existing funding through Council's marine facilities and transport activities.

Council staff will report back to the commissioners with detailed costings for both budgeted and non-budgeted projects by the end of the year.

The plan will also be subject to consultation through the annual plan process in 2023.

Public Interest Journalism funded through NZ On Air.

27 comments

The dumb in charge

Posted on 06-09-2022 15:13 | By Local Too

A complete waste of money, nobody goes to the cbd.


waterfront

Posted on 06-09-2022 15:46 | By dumbkof2

more grandiose ideas for spending money that we havn't got. oh i forgot these commisioners don't care. theydon.t pay rates here


More down the drain

Posted on 06-09-2022 15:50 | By First Responder

Another waste of money, just like the Cameron Rd upgrade. Money would have been better spent on 4 landing Turret Road, and 4 lanes on State 29a from Tauriko to the North side of Maungatapu Bridge. Maybe Anne would like to donate half of her salary to her stupid ideas


Sensational

Posted on 06-09-2022 16:23 | By IguanaEstate

Look forward to this and the vibrant CBD that will be created for our future generations, great work.


Oh well

Posted on 06-09-2022 17:25 | By Let's get real

That's the last time that my associates and I will be going anywhere near the strand for a meal. No parking = No patronage. If I were a restaurateur, I would be looking carefully for a good location before they are all taken up by forward thinkers.


Over Priced!

Posted on 06-09-2022 17:52 | By Larny

84 Million dollars, really?? Funny how Taupo city is making a world-class water front for 25 Million. ( As reported in the Taupo times back on the 1st of July) Easy to spend money when its not yours!! And I spose we'll all be on water restrictions again this summer? I think the 4 commissioners have their priorities wrong for Tauranga city! We need a proper council back!


Come on

Posted on 06-09-2022 19:34 | By What the…?

I’d much prefer you spend $84m on Turret Road and it’s out of date bridge plus a decent road network into the CBD.


whats that

Posted on 06-09-2022 19:41 | By old trucker

i here blow out to$120million,watch this space,they will dig up a bone and costing thousands, look at Cameron road blow out,who does the costings on this ,Leave it as is,TCC have spent millions on this in 30 yrs, GOSH they are already spending up in town,in these troubling times LEAVE IT,my thoughts only,TCC will not listen to us,im glad im on the pointy end of life to see all this going on,and they will not fix potholes, Sunlive Thankyou,10-4 out. phew.


Sorry, but BLOODY HELL

Posted on 06-09-2022 21:37 | By The Caveman

$84 million on a so called "waterfront"!!! AND yes the other bloggers are right on the mark !!! Who the hell wants to be a ratepayer in Tauranga when the council - the LABOUR GMENT appointed "caretakers" - come up with a APPROVE this STUPID WASTE OF RATEPAYER MONEY ?? OH, and that is why I am now selling my last 5 commercial properties in Tauranga -RATES have gone totally over the top and God help those that cannot EXIT like me. OH and yes the latest RATE DEMANDS by the TCC have reduced the property SALE values !!!! But I am GONE ASAP.


It wont be at that price

Posted on 07-09-2022 09:05 | By an_alias

What this blow out to $1B and you have no say but will have to PAY. Watch YOUR rates go through the ROOF for un-elected dictators who don't pay a dime.


Long overdue

Posted on 07-09-2022 09:27 | By Informed

So long over due. Complaining about parking. Never had a problem finding a park in Tauranga. Sounds like people that have never lived in a big city. You might actually have to walk 1-2 minutes from your park to where you want to go.


It is

Posted on 07-09-2022 11:34 | By Merlin

It is all about a good look and not infrastructure and less parking in the CBD. These Commissioners have no idea what is really needed for Tauranga.$1800 per day?? for what.


@informed

Posted on 07-09-2022 17:06 | By Let's get real

Let's all hope that you dine out on the strand every night for the year or two or three whilst these proposed changes are enacted. Maybe you can save the whole area on your own.... I won't be joining you and I suspect that you will be dining and drinking in peace and quiet.


Let’s Get Real

Posted on 07-09-2022 20:08 | By Informed

Me, my mates and family go their all the time. But all of us are expecting more. Like most of the nice beach or harbour cities overseas. People today want to live in cities made for them, where they can walk, ride and play in an amazing environment. No one in Tauranga is going to miss the people so stuck in the past that all they care about is themselves, their car and their rates…. Sad


Another poor priority

Posted on 07-09-2022 20:25 | By Kancho

So we spend on prettying up the waterfront, that's nice , but wait in a few months we will be running out of water again and told to save water and watch our gardens suffer and die. In the meantime we keep adding houses and commercial buildings. So informed is this living in a big city where essential infrastructure is always last, struggling and never enough.


The downtown Tauranga waterfront

Posted on 08-09-2022 09:12 | By earlybird

waterfront has great potential to be turned into something special, but I don't think more grass and trees will attract visitors to the CBD. Just look to the sail structure at the southern end which was supposed to be a major attraction but doesn't actually attract anybody apart from some rough sleepers. What we need are some cafes which just might actually attract people down to the area to enjoy a coffee or two while enjoying the view. We've already got grass, trees and playgrounds all over Tauranga, so we need something different and unique to attract the masses. Sorry, but I think that what is proposed will end up being a non event and a waste of money, and opportunity. Perhaps a structure of a large white elephant would be appropriate.


@informed

Posted on 08-09-2022 09:49 | By Let's get real

Maybe you have missed the avalanche of comments about the enormous fleet of buses that just aren't used. Tauranga, in my opinion, is split into three subsections, the wealthy, those at or nearing retirement and a smaller group of others (young families etc, after all it's still $10 Tauranga) very few of these subsections want to use the buses because of inconvenience and fear for their safety. Which means that parking, for our community, is a must have. Downtown will continue to decline because extensive parking is available free of charge in satellite centres and we can expect sensible business owners to follow the money away from Downtown. Maybe some of those selfish people who want amenities established just for their personal agendas at a cost to the community, should indulge in some rational thinking occasionally. "Build it and they will come" doesn't work in tiny old NZ


Not allot for our money

Posted on 08-09-2022 12:00 | By Fernhill22

If TCC are going to spend $300m on the Civic Precinct that delivers no economic benefit to the taxpayer as well as a further $84m for a poorly designed waterfront i think this really needs to be re-looked at. I'm all for a vibrant CBD & encouraging people to utilize the waterfront but i don't see the current plans making much difference. We have an amazing waterfront which could be transformed into a world class place for people to visit and work from. Where is the bold vision from designers & council to create something special?? For the money we are spending we expect far better outcomes, and are missing a once in a lifetime opportunity.


Water.

Posted on 08-09-2022 15:18 | By morepork

Several posters mentioned that, in a few months' time, we will all be on water rationing and we will have little choice but to watch lovingly tended gardens and lawns die off. I did some homework and found we could build a de-salinization plant that will meet all the needs of Tauranga and the Mount in perpetuity, no matter whether climate change is "real" or not, for around $90 million. So, probably unnecessary upgrade to the waterfront = $84 million; Never have to worry about water again = $90 million. When considering that millions are going to be spent for water, even WITHOUT a de-salinization plant (cost of iwi approval, infrastructure upgrades, replacement and maintenance of existing equipment... just some of it) you could reduce the amount for de-salinization by that much, and it will come in WAY BELOW the cost of this proposed "refurbishment" on the waterfront.


@kancho

Posted on 08-09-2022 20:03 | By Informed

Where does our water come from? It doesn’t come from a dam. It comes from small streams fed by aquifers. Those aquifers are fed by rainfall, that take 12-24 months to get from the ground back to the streams. Yes there should have been a new treatment plant in place - that is fed by a new stream. But your amazing elected members that the boomers want back (you know the ones that only want to save rates) delayed the start of the build multiple times. So yes a new treatment plant will be available soon, but that doesn’t fix climate change. And btw the council does have the power to stop development. In fact it’s the other way round. All councils a legally required to support new development. This pace can’t be held back by the uninformed any more


People in the pictures

Posted on 09-09-2022 11:49 | By Warped

Literally every other shopping center in tauranga is more profitable and a park and more walking to get to a struggling shop, simply because you can enter and park without being charged. Oh and a small side note... it lools like theyre trying to make a play for people to relax as a train thunders past, just after the plane takes off straight ove the cbd.


Water

Posted on 09-09-2022 14:21 | By Kancho

Exactly the point I should say. Why is a city of this size spending money on less essential things than water ?! Has this gang of four government appointees planned for much more water storage? A huge tank farm, dams , we have great topography for some, Why are we dependent on rainfall when a lot of the year we have plenty? Why is all the spending not focused on essentials. Same old blame game but where is the vital actions required? They have sat there and continue to sit there on great remuneration so where is the smart growth that one of them chaired for years? Here for two more years but can't keep blaming when they do no better but spend hundreds of millions on nice but not necessary


@Kancho

Posted on 09-09-2022 16:21 | By morepork

Your water storage tanks are a good interim measure and they SHOULD be looking at it. The idea of de-salinization is one solution of many problems that they won't apply imagination or innovation to. There are some really simple solutions to problems like the buses, energy, carbon emissions,... and the costs would be less than is currently being spent, leaving more for roads, homeless etc. but these solutions are not even being considered. I got to wondering why this is, and I concluded that the status quo reigns supreme in Council Land. "We've always done it this way; why chance my career trying something new?" ...even though the technology has provided many new (and cheaper) ways to do things. De-salinization would pay for itself at CURRENT (no increases) water prices, in around 3 years. After that, they could HALVE our water bills and still cover operating costs.


Kancho

Posted on 09-09-2022 20:11 | By Informed

Oh bless - a dam, tank farms…. Wow. Go read the RMA. Then come back and tell us why the current approach is wrong and your personal expertise is better than the water experts in Tauranga and NZ. It’s amazing how the boomer Sunlive reads always seem to to think they are smarter, better or can do it better and cheaper than the experts. Yet all they show is they don’t understand the basics in todays regulatory or supply chain environment. But hey - keep on posting a bunch of complete nonsense. At least you give the informer people a bit of a laugh.


@ By Warped

Posted on 09-09-2022 20:21 | By The Caveman

You are right on the spot, the trains have been going down "The Strand" since I was 4-5 years old - the giant KA steam engines !!! And they were a sight to see in those days....... The bottom line is the train line is still going down "the Strand", and you can be sure that they will continue to do so for the next 50 years, UNLESS the GMENT comes up with the now $250/$500 MILLION to put a RAIL bridge across the harbour in the location of the current road bridge.


@informed

Posted on 10-09-2022 07:40 | By earlybird

By 'experts', you're obviously referring to those 'experts' responsible for the now defunct $19M parking building. Experts can also make mistakes and bad decisions.


Haha

Posted on 10-09-2022 08:47 | By Kancho

Informed can't see all the water pouring from the sky the streams and rivers pouring into the sea yet defends the indefensible. In most parts of the world we would be considered a wet climate. Yes storage is what we are short of. Auckland takes water from the Waikato so what they have is planning and infrastructure. We have the Katuna , Wairoa and many streams but not infrastructure or so called smart growth that the commissioners have been involved with for years. Informed pretends to know more yet everyone can see it's just nonsense. Water is essential , museums etc are not .


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.