Angst around Three Waters avoidable - Garry Webber

Western Bay of Plenty District mayor Garry Webber. Photo: John Borren/SunLive.

A lack of clarity from the government about the Three Waters reforms has led to 'unnecessary angst”, according to a Bay of Plenty leader.

Western Bay of Plenty District mayor Garry Webber told Local Democracy Reporting if the government had implemented the working group and been clearer about asset ownership and co-governance of the entities before mandating the reforms for councils, they 'might've avoided a fair bit of unnecessary angst”.

Webber was one of 20 members of the working group appointed by the government to address the concerns raised by the sector about the reforms.

Three Waters will see the management of drinking, waste and storm water handed to four regional entities, instead of being managed by each of New Zealand's 67 councils.

The working group made 47 recommendations and last week Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta and Infrastructure Minister Grant Robertson, announced the government would adopt most of them.

One of the concerns raised was around ownership of the assets and privatisation.

The working group recommended a council shareholding model where councils would hold one non-financial share in their entity per 50,000 units of population. For those with populations below 50,000, one share would be given.

This was adopted by government and means Tauranga City Council will have four shares in Entity B and Western Bay of Plenty District Council will have two.

Though councils will in effect own the water entities, the entities would be governed by a 'regional representation group”, of which members would be a 50-50 split between local council representatives and iwi group representatives.

Tauranga City Council commission chair Anne Tolley says: 'It is encouraging to see that the government has accepted most of the three waters working group recommendations, but there are still some significant issues to deal with around entity formation and governance”.

Another issue Webber and the working group raised was the need for improvement in the government's communication and engagement with the public.

'The advertising programme from the government was less than professional and caused a lot of confusion that led to misinformation,” says Webber.

Tolley previously told Local Democracy Reporting the 'government advertising campaign undertaken to raise awareness of the reforms was a missed opportunity”.

An image from the government's Three Waters campaign. Supplied image.

The campaign showed cartoon people who were unhappy with poor quality water while a voice over said the government was working to ensure Kiwis could keep drinking straight from the tap.

Webber says some of the misinformation pertains to Māori ownership of the assets.

'What we've made very clear is the assets will be owned by the councils,” he says.

'Right from the outset, Maoridom made it very clear from day one ownership of the assets was never on their agenda.

Iwi have only ever been interested in Te Mana o te Wai – the health and wellbeing of the waterways and waterbodies, says Webber.

'Protection of water quality in the rivers, lakes, oceans and harbours, that's what their driver was,” he says.

According to Tauranga City Council engagement on the reforms one of the concerns raised by the public was how the governance arrangement would work, including the role of iwi.

Others were, transparency around the ownership and transfer of assets, entity ownership and how councils and communities can influence entity decision making.

Tauranga City Council commission chair Anne Tolley. Photo: John Borren/SunLive.

Tolley says the council will review the modified proposal to see how the concerns expressed by the community and mana whenua have been accommodated.

'Following the review process, we will be able to provide an update on what this means for Tauranga Moana, and consider the next steps required to maintain our dialogue with government and ensure the best outcomes for our people,” she says.

Both Tolley and Webber agree reform is needed to meet future national standards.

'The intent of the reforms is not in question - all New Zealanders should have access to safe and affordable drinking water and the health of our streams and rivers is paramount,” says Tolley.

'To achieve that, it will be important for government and local government to work collaboratively.”

Webber says sewage ending up in harbours, including here in Tauranga, boil water notices and contamination of drinking water, are just some of the issues seen around the country.

'If we're supposed to be a first world nation something had to change,” he says.

'The status quo is just not a solution.”

During the announcement last week, Infrastructure Minister Grant Robertson, said: "Fundamentally these reforms are about delivering clean and safe drinking water at an affordable price for New Zealanders”.

'Without reform, households are facing water costs of up to $9,000 per year, or the prospect of services that fail to meet their needs,” he says.

Webber says the reforms are about being efficient and effective in the three waters space.

'Putting the water quality of our rivers, lakes, harbours, and oceans at the top of the, of the priority list. That's what we're protecting.”

Mahuta was approached for comment but did not responded in time for deadline.

-Local Democracy Reporting is Public Interest Journalism funded through NZ On Air

You may also like....

12 comments

APPOINTED BY THE GOVT

Posted on 06-05-2022 20:19 | By FRANKS

There is not much more to say. He is speaking in support to keep the pay rolling in.


How about some honesty

Posted on 07-05-2022 09:41 | By Let's get real

If angst is another word for rejection, then the increasingly questionable utterings from these ratepayers employees is right on the mark. They seem to forget who pays their mortgages, or more accurately... rent, meal allowances, transport expenses, free food at meetings, free tea and coffee for the out of towners etc, etc, etc....


A lot of spin BS

Posted on 07-05-2022 16:02 | By Kancho

There are several problems with 3 waters to engender criticism and opposition. To me creating several levels huge bureacracy just means more overhead costs. Co governance is purely political and water is not about ownership it belongs to everyone. Nor should iwi have ability to levee water supply. The infrastructure is owned and by councils but no one should own water itself. Money need is everywhere and it's government job to assist councils not undermine them . No to 3 waters , no to increased bureaucracy, no to this government trying to push it through with half truths and huge spending on spin and no to this government election time


@ Franks

Posted on 07-05-2022 19:25 | By Kancho

Absolutely the government selected the working group members and paid for them to agree with the propaganda . A group of yes men , woman , iwi etc. All orchestrated by the spin machine government. Never put to the electorate in election for public scrutiny. Meetings going under the radar for literally years. Bureacracy in action much more to follow. Transparent government as promised , absolutely not !


Bribes

Posted on 08-05-2022 11:44 | By Slim Shady

This failure of a Government tried to avoid the angst by bribery. Even that failed.


The Angst,

Posted on 09-05-2022 08:36 | By R. Bell

reference is more about uninformed people taking the opportunity to unjustly criticise this government. Failing to properly inform would have had the same effect as properly informing. The effect is purely political opportunism, in these columns by the usual extreme commenters. Three Waters is happening, that is all. Everything else is simple minded political nonsense.


Kick back Tolley

Posted on 09-05-2022 09:05 | By an_alias

Can you believe or even ask the person who create three waters anything related to it ? Come on guys Tolley and crew are there to rubber stamp this and take the money.


Hasn't yet

Posted on 09-05-2022 09:45 | By Kancho

Nonsence. Three waters hasn't happened yet no amount of propaganda or spin changes that. This government may well be gone next election because of this manipulation and secretive tactics. It certainly isn't a fait compli no matter how much spin it has. Implementation is supposedly after the election so we shall see.


Tom Ranger

Posted on 09-05-2022 10:19 | By Tom Ranger

Both photo's accurately portray what appears to be two complete sell-outs.


It just so happens,

Posted on 10-05-2022 08:30 | By R. Bell

that Three Waters is happening. All major parties agree to the need for it. Conservatism has never solved any issue, it simply preserves a dis-functional status quo. When a few details are sorted and the political posturing ceases progress will lead to a new happening. Good clean water to drink, clean rivers to swim in, and storm water properly dealt with. Bring it on.


A lot of opposition

Posted on 10-05-2022 16:19 | By Kancho

Not yet there still time 2024 to stop or at least severely curtail the bureaucracy and control. Not over until Nanaia Mahuta sings


@Kancho...........

Posted on 10-05-2022 21:29 | By groutby

....the news is bad, I've heard Nanaia Mahuta singing recently on the telly....it's over mate!....


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.