National MP Simon Bridges has railed against the government's move to protect Maori wards, describing it as insulting as a Maori man.
Labour has begun rushing through legislation under urgency to do away with a public veto on Maori wards.
Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta says the debate has been decades in the making and change is well overdue.
"It's an idea whose time has come. I'm proud that we're taking these steps to push through a change that is long-awaited," says Mahuta.
In 2002, the then-Labour government - of which Mahuta was a part - changed the law to allow councils to set up Maori wards.
But the legislation included a provision allowing a tiny minority of voters, just 5 percent, to force a public referendum and ultimately veto a council's decision.
Since then, 24 councils have tried to introduce the Maori wards - with only three successful.
Times have changed, says Mahuta.
"I'm ... proud of the many mayors and councillors who have lobbied me over the last four years to say 'let's just get on with it, there's too much to do to dilly dally, let's get on with it'," she says.
Nanaia Mahuta says mayors and councillors want the right to establish Māori wards. Photo: RNZ / Dom Thomas.But sentiment has not universally shifted - with the Opposition furious at the move.
During the first reading last night, National MPs criticised the legislation as anti-democratic, rushed through by a Labour Party which never campaigned on the matter and with only a week for the public to give feedback.
Bridges told the House it was personally insulting to suggest he - and other Maori - need special and separate treatment.
"Because as a Maori man, it says I'm not good enough because of my whakapapa, because of the colour of my skin ... this bill to me says I'm not good enough to win a vote of a non-Maori, well I am good enough," he says.
The remarks prompted a fiery response from Labour's Willie Jackson.
"Simon Bridges who tries to advocate a Maori position, who should not be the MP for Tauranga, Jan Tinetti should be, he only squeezed home because he forgot about his Maori side yet again during the Tauranga campaign," he says.
The Maori Party also slapped down National, saying the party should know better - particularly given its recent commitment to stand in the Maori seats at the next general election.
Its co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer says the time has come to do away with a racist provision.
"I'm sure a week will be enough time for the racists to speak. This is a huge win for Maori and for those who have stood up against racism and fought for mana whenua representation in local government," she says.
The Maori Affairs Select Committee will now consider the legislation and hear from the public, before reporting back next Monday.
-RNZ



20 comments
Democracy
Posted on 10-02-2021 07:29 | By Kancho
Well I didn't vote Labour to usurp democracy.Had they said this was part of their direction I would have not voted for them. So a lifetime of Labour voting will change next time. They have no mandate. Referenda is democracy in action but we are being told what we want . A rort
Thought
Posted on 10-02-2021 09:02 | By tabatha
Unfortunately the only way a Maori can really get votes is via at large. Some wards do not have the numbers and to me it would solve the problem of having Maori advisers who still get paid.
Tom Ranger
Posted on 10-02-2021 09:31 | By Tom Ranger
Exactly Kancho. That is the only issue here for me. But if maori communities or any other communities want them. It doesn't affect me much...if at all. I just don't want to see them hanging out with the homeless people enabling them to sustain their lifestyle choices more and defending poor social behavior. I identify as human first of all. I have European ancestry. I can see both sides. The maori way of seeing the world is different and obviously requires something different to current status quo. It is very difficult for some to understand or appreciate this or even have any interest/respect.
Hmmm
Posted on 10-02-2021 09:48 | By Let's get real
There shouldn't be any need for a veto, because there shouldn't be any preferential seating at the council tables based on race, creed, colour, sexual orientation, gender identity or affiliation to a particular organisation. Stand a candidate and let the cards fall where they will, come election day. I can't say that the cream will rise to the top, with recent activities, But in general, Quality will find a way of identifying itself.
Thank goodness
Posted on 10-02-2021 09:56 | By Accountable
We have a strong Maori person prepared to stand up for democracy. Well done Simon! Tom Ranger please explain to everybody exactly what the difference is in the Maori way of thinking. Your words " It is very difficult for some to understand or appreciate this or even have any interest/respect". Please put us all in the picture as to what you really mean by your comments. If you understand it then it won't be difficult to explain to everybody in a way that will make it clear in the minds of non Maori people.
Tom Ranger
Posted on 10-02-2021 11:18 | By Tom Ranger
I've said what I know to be true. Plz feel free to do more research If you'd like to. It is quite a challenge for anyone to summarize an entire belief system as well as conceptual and visceral thought patterns of an entire culture on a comment section of Sunlive. Here is one example. Whenua means both "land" and "placenta"! What this does is forever link how important the health of the land is for us as people. Tangata whenua is another. People of the land. Traditional european viewpoint is people own land. Maori view is land owns us! Land is us! By succession. Which is why many maori feel like they are much more likely to look after land AS IS natural state bc of this belief as looking after land and sea is Akin to looking after yourself. I hope you do look into it more.
Simon is being duplicitous,
Posted on 10-02-2021 11:30 | By R. Bell
he knows full well that he neither represents Maori interests or embraces Maori culture. This subject has nothing to do with race it has everything to do with the founding partners ability to retain their treaty rights. Race only becomes an issue when those opposed to Maori representation, even as a rank minority, have no other valid reason for their opposition. Democracy is not a one view proposition it demands flexibility. something sadly lacking in many Pakeha, as comments on Sunlive and other places constantly prove.
Tom Ranger
Posted on 10-02-2021 11:30 | By Tom Ranger
Maori language is in reverse order to english. Our sentence structures are opposite to english and the brain is literally hard wired differently for this. Although maori speak english now...Our genes are used to thinking the opposite way around. I like Simon but he does not understand Maori world concepts. He has obviously had quite a non-maori upbringing. As have I. Because my parents were hit for speaking it at school. It's a different world for maori... They were taught it's bad to be maori...They taught their kids(us)...it's bad to be maori...Maori live in a different world to non-maori.
More Labour Lies
Posted on 10-02-2021 11:54 | By Avman
As usual the government has lied in order to push through this latest attack on democracy. They claim that under the current system, maori cannot get proportional representation. In fact, maori have almost perfect representation on councils in proportion to their numbers: maori make up 13.7% of the population and have 13.5% of elected council representatives. It's difficult to get better than that. So maori can and do get elected on their own merit under the current system. This change is aimed at stopping fair and equal proportional representation and forcing an apartheid system upon us, with a deliberate over-representation of maori. Boy does this government hate democracy.
Simon Bridges does not speak for Tauranga Maori
Posted on 10-02-2021 12:27 | By Peter Dey
Mr Bridges and his whakapapa do not speak for Tauranga Maori. Rawiri Waititi is the MP for Tauranga Maori. Mr Waititi can tell Mr Bridges that Tauranga Maori want Maori Wards and if Mr Bridges opposes Tauranga Maori Wards then he is patronizing Maori by telling them that they do not know what is in their best interests but he does because he has been elected by Pakeha voters. The Treaty is NZ Law as a Government Maori partnership. Pakeha using their weight of numbers to block Maori Wards and fair Maori representation is dictation not partnership. Nanaia Mahuta is totally justified in preventing anti-Maori Pakeha political unfairness.
Pitiful
Posted on 10-02-2021 12:37 | By Let's get real
For some to suggest that another person who has many times represented themselves as being Maori, is not representing Maori interests is deplorable. He may not support YOUR personal viewpoint, but then maybe your viewpoint is extremely flawed.
Avman what is your data source?
Posted on 10-02-2021 13:08 | By Peter Dey
Avman you write that Maori make up 13.7% of the population and 13.5% of local council representatives. What is the source for these figures?
Tom Ranger
Posted on 10-02-2021 13:31 | By Tom Ranger
@Let's get real. Simon Bridges and Rawiri Waititi go to a local marae...who has the support? Simon speaks for some maori and I do acknowledge the point he and others here are making. But it cannot be argued imo that he understands or represents traditional maori concepts. MAIN POINT HERE that I think we all agree with is... It is very dangerous that a political party can change law like they have. Unilaterally. At the end of the day...Why is everyone so upset about a Ward that has nothing to do with ya'll? Absolutely no impact! Why so troubled?
Maori Wards?
Posted on 10-02-2021 13:35 | By Daedalus
When did apartheid become so popular? The Labour Govt. only campaigned about Covid 19. They put forward no policies and therefore have no mandate to change anything. I would have said that a national referendum would be required to make such a change.
Tom Ranger,
Posted on 10-02-2021 14:08 | By R. Bell
Thank you for explaining the difference between Maori thinking and that of many pakeha. It seems the gulf is massive but if we take away the obvious bias and prejudice this is a very simple exercise. Maori enterprise demands recognition and representation. We all have to remember that the law still requires a majority vote by elected councilors, if those who object to a Maori ward are able to elect a majority of like believers then the law says they get their way. It is debatable whether or not Maori wards are sufficient reason to elect or not for most people. Governments change law all the time. With its massive majority at the last election they have that right. All interested parties knew that a law change was possible.
Tom Ranger
Posted on 10-02-2021 14:59 | By Tom Ranger
@R. Bell. I tried. : ) What is good for maori or any Kiwi community is good for our entire community as a whole. Hopefully the wards can achieve what they need to. But I don't see them making that much of a difference if I'm honest. V. good point about the majority of councilors req. Storm in a teacup isn't it really.
Tom Ranger,
Posted on 10-02-2021 16:22 | By R. Bell
You are like a breath of fresh air on here. I sincerely hope you have given food for thought to those who confuse representation with privilege, democracy with separatism or differing opinions with dissent. A storm in a tea cup sums it up perfectly.
Tom Ranger
Posted on 10-02-2021 16:26 | By Accountable
It doesn't make sense to say that a person with a small amount of Maori Blood has a brain that is wired differently. Where's the proof that this is a scientific fact? These faulse reasons are trying to paint a picture of how hard done by the maori people are when in fact they are no different to every other race of people in the world. Everybodys brain operates in the same way but are actually taught different beliefs which are accepted without putting any thought into the background of those beliefs. Why is it that the majority of Maori people are happy to live normal lives, working ,paying taxes and bringing up children who don't have chips on their shoulders and are happy with their life the way it is in NZ today? Are their brains wired differently? I don't think so and you know that's a fact.
@Peter Day
Posted on 10-02-2021 16:27 | By Avman
The source of my information is from Local Government NZ, and their published elected member profile. It is available online from LGNZ. This is government information, which the government has deliberately lied about.
Sad
Posted on 10-02-2021 17:21 | By Kancho
Like many I have lived and worked in New Zealand as a New Zealander as simple as that. We all have worked with Maori have Maori friends and family members. Never considered Maori as different or special in every day life. Everyone equal everyone with their own points. Now it seems this is not so , we are becoming more like America which year on year has become more divided. Pushing rights and activism like physics teaches every action has a reaction. I will continue to treat people as equals whether by gender or race . I don't see anyone being more equal or special by law. Shame really , so much being lost.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.