Centre scuppered by frustration

Buddy Mikaere is committed to restoring hapu real-estate.

Sulphur Point's Marine Park will remain a reserve, following a decision by Conservation Minister Eugenie Sage.

A proposal to revoke the reserve status of 0.7ha of Marine Park's total 11.2ha was made by the Tauranga City Council, to allow for a Waikato University Marine Research and Education Centre to be erected.

Sage declined the application for a number of reasons, including there being no assessment of alternative sites and the majority of submitters (58 per cent) opposing the revocation.

Unsurprisingly, council and the University of Waikato are disappointed with the minister's decision.

Council says local iwi and hapu were consulted before it publicly proposed this site for revocation, and that it undertook 'a comprehensive analysis” of other site options.

Those in opposition to the revocation included iwi groups Ngai Tamarawaho and Ngati Pukenga.

Iwi spokesperson Buddy Mikaere says they initially expressed their opposition to the revocation, because they were 'fed-up”.

'This dates back to when Route K was built straight through our old pa site.

'In compensation we were supposed to get some land for a cultural centre, which Council decided to subdivide instead, and another plot for a health centre, which they said we couldn't have following a flood assessment.

'They said they'd find us yet another piece of land, and that land was Sulphur Point.

'Before we could get our plans up and running, council told us they were giving the land to Waikato University. That's when I got really annoyed.

'In our letter to Minister Sage, we said we reject the revocation of Marine Park's reserve status until the University talked to us, to find a way that both of our aspirations can be looked after.”

Buddy says iwi are not against development in Tauranga.

'We see the sense in having the university facility there and the jobs and the income that will be created from it. It's fine by us – but why is it always us having to compromise our values?”

Despite the strong initial reactions to the decision, council, Waikato University and iwi are now discussing a way forward.

'We will work with the university on options for how to proceed,” says Tauranga City Council strategy and growth general manager Christine Jones.

'One option would be to seek a new location.”

Buddy says iwi feel positive about the discussions.

'I think the Mayor is aware of our sensitivities now, and I think it's going to lead to a much better relationship in future.

'As a community we need to take a much wider view on these things. I believe there's room for all aspirations, we just need to sit down with all parties and have a reasonable conversation where what is best for the whole community drives the conversation.”

5 comments

Buddy, ANY evidence, a written agreement?

Posted on 10-08-2020 16:19 | By Murray.Guy

“They (Council) said they’d find us yet another piece of land, and that land was Sulphur Point." Hey Buddy, I believe the community is entitled to evidence, an agreement in writing. I recall the 'Smiths Farm' proposal, a cultural facility and disappointed it did not proceed. I do not recall ANY COMMUNITY CONSULTATION in regards the gifting of marine reserve land at Sulphur Point. No evidence was provided to validate the gifting of the Chapel St (Mobil fuel) land. I am mindful the Sulphur Point land was seabed, so aside from a 'food source' no claim of occupancy, confiscation. I note, with a degree of apprehension, "Buddy Mikaere is committed to restoring hapu real-estate" and I'd like to know if this is by way of purchase using Crown settlement funds or other, or is it gifted by stealth, double dipping, with obliging City Council staff, elected members?


What did they expect?

Posted on 10-08-2020 17:55 | By waiknot

No assessment of alternative sites included in the submission. Translation no other sites were considered?


Thanks Eugenie!!

Posted on 10-08-2020 18:19 | By Border Patrol

I went to the councils "public consultations" over this and it was obvious that Kelvin Clout and the other council people had already made up their minds. Even so, I went to the trouble of completing a submission against. I wondered why Mr Mikaere was also there, now I know why. Just leave this green space alone for future generations, and put your buildings somewhere else. But wait, you'll see that this council will not give up on this and it'll be put forward in another guise until they eventually get their way.


Shameful.

Posted on 11-08-2020 12:02 | By morepork

That iwi are unable to trust a council when it makes promises. If they were promised the land then they should get it. I can understand Buddy's frustration. Council should not have been making promises they couldn't keep in the first place. As for the Mayor "now being aware" I wouldn't hold my breath on that one, Buddy.


SORRY, but did I miss something

Posted on 12-08-2020 21:52 | By The Caveman

The "land at Sulphur Point" was NEVER "land" - pre 1965!!!! it was harbour bottom - YES deep water and mud flats until the Harbour Board started to dredge the harbour to provide the beginnings of the now container wharf back in the late 1960's. And if I remember it correctly, the dredging was to provide for the container wharf - AND as part of that development, PROVIDE a facility for boaties and YOUNG yachties, who, it was considered should no longer be forced to use the MAIN shipping channel past the container wharf!!! AND the bottom line is that COMMERCIAL development (educational or otherwise) should NEVER be permitted on the WEST side of Sulphur Point other than for those that support the original intention - AND Murray Guy is RIGHT !!


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.