Museum costs will fall on ratepayers

Museum plans are on the move again, deep within the bowels of City Hall the minions are feverishly working on plans to re-launch this phoenix from the ashes of the 2007 election, voters made it abundantly clear that it was not wanted.
It would seem that City Hall is constantly beseeched by 'besotted money seeking locusts” that want public money for what they themselves wouldn't and don't contribute to, a good recent example is the Mount Hot Pools where the 2011 Resource Consent failed and cost about $6 million and the reasons were known in 2000 (same as the Museum idea), the Art Gallery was to be 'community funded” to but all costs have fallen on the ratepayer and are added to your rates.
After some serious arm twisting City Hall agreed to provide free land fully consented for a 'Community Funded” Museum, Cliff Road has been talked about but isn't suitable. All indications are that Ratepayers will be lined up to borrow $20 million and more plus annual costs of some $3-4 million. This is not 'community funded”, surely some detailed information of where the money to coming from is mandatory here?
This will add to the annual rates bill every year initially by about $90 per household, then increasing.

R Putain, Gisborne.

2 comments

ART GALLERY

Posted on 07-01-2012 14:38 | By SCARLET PIMPINEL

Then will it be the same as that right?


Ch-Ch CEO salary

Posted on 25-01-2012 11:17 | By algail

There is a lot of controversy re the CEO of CH-Ch city receiving a $75.000 increase in salary. In NZ councilors and the like are grossly overpaid for what they do. In England elected officials carry out as many duties in many cases as a paid employee. My sister is a councilor in England and she works as a councilor every day, at times working from 9am till 10pm attending meetings and carrying out duties. Now let's look at a comparison of two councils one in England and Ch-Ch as an example here. Please don't dash about doing conversions here from pound to dollar that doesn't work in these cases what they are paid in England stays in England. A coffee here cost $4 in England it costs four pounds. Ch-Ch has a population of 348400. (Source: Statistics New Zealand Jan 2012) . I understand the CEO is paid $500 075.00 per annum. Now let's look for example at Buckingham which has a population of 500.000 and is grossly more complex than Ch-Ch hundreds of villages and small towns thousands of miles of road and a massive infrastructure. Here are the salaries for comparison and remember most of these people carry the duties of elected officials five days a week working anything from 8 to 12 hours per day. The chief executive of Bucks County Council - that is the head of the paid service - earns £240,000 per annum plus £46,000 towards his pension. The Leader of the Council, i.e. the head of the party in power, gets £25,000 pa and nothing more this post is similar to a Mayor in NZ The Chairman, a ceremonial role, gets £25,000 per annum. He does not get a chauffeur driven car unlike the District Chairman. The chief of the District gets £137,000 The leader gets £15,000 plus £5,000 as a member of the council. The Chairman gets £10,000 extra on top of his basic members allowance of £5,000. The chairman also gets the use of a chauffeur driven car for ceremonial events plus £5,000 dress allowance. Now who do you think is being overpaid in New Zealand. No wonder the people of Ch-Ch are up in arms over a $75.000 increase in salary. May I ask who has had a 14% increase in salary in the last five years? Nobody I know. Alastair Bethlehem


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.