On reading the article and letters in the Weekend Sun 3 June, regarding Mr. P. McKernon's objections about the killing of swans and the subsequent xenophobic comments about him, I noted that none of the points he raised have actually been answered!
How sad it is that we vilify someone for caring! I feel we as a nation need a more caring attitude in our daily lives, don't forget we are rated highly in the world for child abuse, I wonder if this lack of compassion amongst hunters has an influence in this matter?
Pointing out swans are monogamous was to perhaps try and evoke some of this compassion? Instead it provoked a flippant homophobic comment!
As I see it Mr McKernon's main objection is the ‘pleasure' shooters (irrelevant of social standing and occupation) take from killing, this is so primitive (the meaning of Neanderthal!) and should be of concern to us all.
The miss-interpretation of the ‘Death to dog author' letter is absurd, the writer was obviously pointing out the fact, in a sarcastic manner, that after swans may come the demise of the dog!
As a final note, saying it's economical to shoot swan for food? Taking into consideration, the cost of guns, shells, camouflage gear, fuel and all other expenses in return for the small amount of meat would hardly be cost effective?
The fact remains that the shoot is purely for fun, they just enjoy the Thrill of the kill!
I for one would much rather live in a nation with a caring, compassionate population who show empathy towards animals not one that takes pleasure from killing them.

Alison Holder