I am astounded by the assertions made in Mr Frank Begley's (TCC of City Partners Manager) response to the Stevenson and Harlen revelations on the application of Building Acts 1991 and 2004 relating to Baypark Stadium. The matters raised in the Beca Carter Report of November 2006 on the purchase of the Stadium by Council (TCVL) raised questions about Building Consents, Code Compliance Certificate as built plans. This was of such concern to me that I personally attended Tauranga City Council Customer Services Desk to check through details of various consents as they related to Baypark Stadium and that site generally. I was unable to get any information from that section and it was suggested a request be made to the Building Services for the information required.
That was actioned in June 2010 and the response came back from ex-CEO Town, not the Building Department itself, which was quite strange. This response indicated some outstanding matters had been addressed when Council acquired the Stadium and some were not yet attended to. It is ridiculous for Mr. Begley to suggest that consent and compliance matters were cleared up before Council purchased the Stadium. That is in my view both misleading and incorrect. In any event, it is a red herring because the fact that no consents or compliance certificates existed which is the breach, not whether or not they are fixed up later by Council. Certificates shouldn't be retrospectively granted anyway and TCC invariably refuse to do so. (abridged) R. Paterson, Matapihi.


4 comments
NOTHING HERE IS MISLEADING
Posted on 20-05-2011 23:18 | By TERMITE
It is clear that all the baove is an offence under the law on multiple accounts.
WHAT YOU DON'T KNOW
Posted on 24-05-2011 18:39 | By WOFTAM
Bet there are more problems than this going on there after reading this. Not so long ago Council employed yet another 17 people from CGAF Ltd, after a year or two surely some of the back log would have been done by now as there are so few new building consents going on that all the mess back in history could be cleaned up now?
Edited and some
Posted on 26-05-2011 11:52 | By MASSA KISSED
I think that you only get told what 'they' allow you to know, it is all SQUEEGED and all is FLUFFY DUCKS for the masses to absord
THEY SUED ME
Posted on 26-05-2011 12:49 | By WORMTONGUE
Even though I had a code of compliance certificate and everything was ok, they for some reason decided to sue me. After $20,000 in legal fees they withdrew and went away. Not having a Code of compliance is not good at all, much worse than me, so why has nothing been done?
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.