Council to challenge housing rules

Tauranga City Council is taking on the government over its control of the rules city councillors say are contributing to the country's housing crisis.

Councils' ability to build houses is constrained by government policies. The government is trying to change the rules through a proposed National Policy Statement on urban development capacity.


Tauranga City Council officers on Willow Street. File photo.

Tauranga City Council's reply is that achieving the outcomes sought by the NPS is illegal for councils under current law, beyond the scope of councils to act under the Local government Act and the Resource Management Act.

Proposed quarterly reporting requirements will impose an additional major workload and impact how the city council manages its own growth, as well as that of the SmartGrowth partners.

'Local authorities alone cannot deliver all the essential elements to support growth due, not only to an inability to pay for the required infrastructure, but also in terms of the many elements that fall outside their control,” says TCC planning manager Michael Tucker's report, presented Strategy and Policy committee meeting on Monday.

'Consultation with other providers is required by the NPS, such as with NZTA and the Ministry of Education, but consultation will not guarantee that provision or contribution is forthcoming for elements such as State Highway investment or new schools required to support growth.

'There needs to be strong commitment from Central Government to collaborate with local authorities to deliver these elements.”

The council is challenging the NPS on a number of points including a requirement for 15-20 per cent 'freeboard” in providing housing land.

It could create ‘planning blight', where an excess of zoning/infrastructure capacity is provided and hampers the best use of resources.

'A recent example of such over-ambitious projection of growth into the long term and its consequences can be seen in the Rotorua Eastern Arterial designation, which was in place for over 50 years before its uplift earlier this year, having created significant severance and upheaval in the community and curtailing the efficient use of urban land,” says the city council submission.

The government has been referred to the Smart Growth Strategy, a growth strategy that is cross boundary, involving the Western Bay of Plenty District Council, the Tauranga City Council the Bay of Plenty Regional Council, plus iwi.

As at December 31, 2015, there were 9350 greenfield sites enabled by the operative Tauranga City Plan, enough to accommodate around 9.5 years of growth, catering for 83 per cent of the projected demand over this period.

The balance will be provided by infill development and intensification within the existing urban area.

TCC has already committed most of its available debt capacity to funding growth. Any requirement stemming from the NPS to increase investment in infrastructure without financial support is likely to cost both existing and future ratepayers.

TCC wants central Government introduce measures to ‘de-risk' local authority debt that is for growth related capital expenditure in high growth areas.

While housing affordability is identified as a primary issue driving the NPS, The council submits there is potentially only a limited impact supply by itself can have on housing affordability in the short term. Alternative measures, including a national strategy for delivering non-market housing, should be pursued.

'The central issue identified by TCC is that the NPS will not realise its objectives unless there are other changes, tools and measures introduced to assist councils, and several other relevant entities, to deliver all the elements required for building successful urban communities.

'Local authorities alone cannot deliver all the essential elements to support growth due not only to an inability to pay for the required infrastructure, but also in terms of the many elements that fall outside their control.

'Consultation with other providers is required by the NPS, such as with NZTA and the Ministry of Education, but consultation will not guarantee that provision or contribution is forthcoming for elements such as State Highway investment or new schools required to support growth. There needs to be strong commitment from central Government to collaborate with local authorities to deliver these elements.”

The Strategy and Policy Committee approved the submissions.

6 comments

Sensible

Posted on 13-07-2016 15:30 | By DAD

It makes sense to let Bob Clarkson develop his land with school,shopping and roads already planned for the area!


Cant look in the mirror

Posted on 13-07-2016 15:47 | By Crash test dummies

The Smartgrowth strategy is a self serving exaggerated extravagance that is the single biggest handicap to development and economical pricing of section in the Bay. Yet they blindly rely upon it without looking in the mirror first to see if just perhaps that they are on the wrong track and some.


meddling

Posted on 13-07-2016 15:49 | By Crash test dummies

TCC is causing all the delay in processing of building consents and there is no real reason for these delays. This applies to building consents as well as subdivisions. Until that is addressed nothing will change, even if Government seizes land and instantly makes it available, TCC will block all happening for up to 10 years before a title is available.


You can be sure ratepayers will pay

Posted on 13-07-2016 16:14 | By BullShtAlert

I'd be willing to bet that ratepayers who've worked hard for their houses get slugged again to pay for so-called affordable housing???


Great Photo

Posted on 13-07-2016 21:51 | By Dazed and Confused

Of the Worlds best looking bus stop.There is only the ghosts of councillor's past in that building


Smart growth a rort

Posted on 21-07-2016 09:51 | By marshamaxw

Smartgrowth has been shown to accelerate the wrong kind of growth.The housing produced is for the higher end of the market.Typically homes that cost 500k.It produces the very housing inequality that it promises to fix. Big business developers are driving this, the only housing they are interested in profiteering from is making high end market that produce the high margins.The issue is being manipulated by them to get the council to lower their rules so they can get their boomburb development approved.We need a taxation system that redirects investment away from housing which is distorting of the rest of the economy


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.