Law changes concerning Fish & Game

Fish & Game is warning that proposed changes to wildlife legislation will severely restrict its ability to do its job and protect wildlife and the environment.

The Wildlife (Powers) Amendment Bill gives DOC staff greater powers to fight wildlife offences but specifically excludes Fish & Game rangers, says Fish & Game.


Rotorua Fish & Game Officer Anthony van Dorp holds a spear seized from a Rotorua poacher.

Of particular concern are clauses covering the powers to seize evidence, stop suspects, prevent offending and require offenders to produce ID.

The present bill specifically excludes Fish & Game rangers from having those powers, says Fish & Game chief executive Bryce Johnson.

While the organisation generally supports the bill's intent, Bryce says it opposes efforts to exclude Fish & Game.

'It's a mystery why Fish & Game has been excluded. We want to be treated the same as other conservation enforcement agencies.

'Fish & Game is a statutory organisation under the Conservation Act and is required to enforce conservation, fisheries and game laws.

'We are asking Parliament to acknowledge Fish & Game staff and rangers' efforts to protect New Zealand's unique wildlife and change this bill so they can continue to do this valuable work,” says Bryce.

Fish & Game fields hundreds of staff and volunteers as rangers throughout the country. Each has undergone a police check and received training similar to that given to DOC and MPI staff.

'Fish & Game's rangers are well trained and detect hundreds of wildlife, game and environment offences every year. Already, in some regions rangers face a difficult and dangerous job and routinely have to wear stab-proof vests while on patrol,” says Bryce.

'Failure to acknowledge that will make their job harder.”

Bryce says the bill also fails to recognise that the police routinely work with Fish & Game.

'When working with Fish & Game, sworn police officers are deemed to be Fish & Game rangers. To specifically exclude Fish & Game rangers from the bill also excludes the police.”

Fish & Game says the solution is straightforward.

'We are asking the select committee to change the bill so it no longer specifically excludes Fish & Game rangers from doing their job.”

2 comments

waste

Posted on 08-07-2016 13:52 | By CC8

Fish and Game is a private organisation which thinks it has mandate to act as if it is a government department.total waste of Public time effort and money..An organisation set up by those who once thought they might be "Kiwi Gentlemen" to protect their introduced "game " species from the commoners. Somehow they have at some time convinced the NZ Govt that they should be a quasi official government entity.. Seems to me they have no official place in NZA, if they want to organise their "club " members that id their prerogative, but arresting people and making seizures ...NOT IN THIS DAY AND AGE! In fact why regulate any of this at all, introduced species have no place in NZ, most of them have become pests..rid our streams and rivers of the pests and allow the native species to flourish.


Well Yes

Posted on 08-07-2016 20:55 | By The Caveman

While I have some symphony with F & G's overall interests, CC8 is correct, they are for all intents and purposes a private organisation, that likes to think that they "own" the wild game and fish in NZ. A bit like Forest and Bird who now seem to think that they should also tell saltwater fishers what they should and should not catch. Sorry, while you may both think that you have a right to tell New Zealander's what they should hunt and catch, the simple answer is that 90% of what you object too is either introduced pests or at such a level that the private hunter / fisher makes bugger all impact on the overall stocks. That said leave it to a government department to police those that exceed the "official" bag limits - DOC


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.