I read with much concern the letters of: Stevenson 15-April, editors note, Harlen 22-April and Begley, City Partner Manager 29-April.
Ratepayers elected Councillors to represent us, only us. They should be accountable to ratepayers and that includes Building Act 2004 compliance.
It is ultimately there responsibility irrespective how many staff are employed.
It is of great concern that a public venue (owned by TCC since Sept-2007) has not been compliant with the Building Act. TCC have the building files, consent applications and issue the Compliance certificates yet this ‘little' divergence from the law has been known at TCC for many years, nothing has been done about it, why? So then TCC has: - building files, consents and issues the Code of Compliance Certificates (CCC) meanwhile all remained totally incomplete and potentially unsafe since 2001 until now, who has allowed this to happen?
The Governance/Proven Leadership must have been aware of this for a long time yet done nothing!. It is blatantly obvious that from 2001 to date that all have failed to comply with the Building Act 2004 on a proper and timely basis. Messrs Begley has merely confirmed the same on 29 April, when where the fines paid and by who? A Barnes, Tauranga.


7 comments
WTF 2 MF @ TCC
Posted on 06-05-2011 20:05 | By YOGI BEAR
It really is just not good enough now is it, perhaps HUOA needs to take charge and show so strenght about the place for a change and tidy all of this up.
TO MANY MF@TCC
Posted on 07-05-2011 23:06 | By TERMITE
Some one is doing the over laying of carpet of this little mud hole going onto cesspit and some here. It is plan and obvious that Frank Begley has admitted an offense / TCC has broken the law and a rush effort is being made to patch it up, all that is needed is for the fines to be paid now.
SAY HELLO TO 'HUOA'
Posted on 08-05-2011 21:23 | By Secret Squirrel
I know who he is ... and he needs all the help he can get and yet he does not even know it that he needs that help. living in a blissful world must be so simple.
Naughty Huoas Allright
Posted on 12-05-2011 09:23 | By Hebegeebies
Pretty worrying stuff here.and looks like could be pretty serious sh#$. Definitely something for the Minister of Building and Construction Building Authority and OSH to check out and get teeth into.If preliminary investigations find any 'smoke' then there must be a public inquiry to take appropriate action in respect of any wrongdoing.The whole thing could potentially be a danger to patrons and spectators.You expect this sort of drama in 3rd World countries not NZ
SHOE FITS WEAR IT
Posted on 12-05-2011 14:29 | By WORMTONGUE
It has been built, operated, inspected and looked upon as a third world facilty, the design was for a bund for the public, not all teh stands and corporate boxes and all that carry on. End result it is a compelte shambles from start to finish, just ask HUOA he knows all about it as he was in the middle of it all teh way through.
It was not me?
Posted on 13-05-2011 09:26 | By THOMAS BROWN
I am not a HUOA type, Baypark is a good facility for the community, it is just a shame that the initial owner got a bit distracted along the way when building it.
A BIT WHAT ?
Posted on 13-05-2011 12:31 | By YABBA DABBA DO
It was a complete and total divergence mate, what is there has nothing to do with what was planned and approved to be there, it is completely different. So that makes it a complete indulgence and some, then we all pay for it, Why?
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.