The results from a Colmar Brunton poll commissioned by fruit exporter Turners & Growers show New Zealanders think Zespri's near export monopoly on kiwifruit should end.
The Colmar Brunton Consumer Link Research Unit phone survey returned a result of 85 per cent of respondents favouring removal of the Zespri monopoly for kiwifruit exports beyond Australia.
See video below of Turners & Growers managing director Jeff Wesley talking on a Te Puke orchard about some new kiwifruit varieties.
Nationally, 85 per cent of respondents say the government should be promoting free and fair trade for all New Zealand kiwifruit exporters as it does for other exporters.
In light of the Psa disease outbreak, 82 per cent of respondents say the monopoly should be repealed and growers should be allowed to export varieties other than Zespri's.
Because New Zealand wants other countries to practise free and fair trade, 73 per cent of those responding to the survey say the monopoly is unfair.
The poll also reveals New Zealanders' concerns that Zespri is retaining monopoly powers while it plans to grow kiwifruit in competing countries.
About 62 per cent of survey respondents say the government should repeal Zespri's private kiwifruit monopoly given Zespri wants to grow kiwifruit in China and other countries which compete with New Zealand kiwifruit.
The poll finds 72 per cent of New Zealanders believe it is unfair for a private company and its private shareholders to reap the profits from an entire industry.
Zespri is not a cooperative like Fonterra, owned by suppliers, but a private company. Shares in Zespri are not linked to production, with as many as 30 per cent of growers unable to get shares in the company they are forced to supply fruit to.
The survey results back the call from the government's own taskforce, which is calling for Zespri's monopoly to go, says Turners & Growers chairman Tony Gibbs.
In its 2009 recommendations to government, the 2025 taskforce questioned a public policy that prevents more than a third of growers who wished to do so from selling their fruit abroad through other companies.
'As a country championing free trade, New Zealand has to be ‘squeaky clean' when it comes to its own affairs,” says Tony.
'New Zealand kiwifruit growers and owners are banned by their own country from exporting fruit which they own.”
The poll results are included in a letter to all MPs.
'We cannot ask other countries to remove trade barriers when all New Zealand kiwifruit growers are forced to sell through Zespri, and owners of non-Zespri kiwifruit varieties are banned from selling their fruit anywhere but Australia and New Zealand,” says Tony. 'New Zealand growers should have the right to choose which fruit they grow and who they sell to, especially considering there are now numerous innovative new kiwifruit varieties, while Zespri still only markets two.”
UPDATE: Read Zespri's response here.
7 comments
Post Harvest Rort
Posted on 18-04-2011 11:14 | By The author of this comment has been removed.
Ask zespri How it sets coolstorage rates.If it was out to maximise grower returns u would think it would ask for tenders for this service correct?.The price is set by the post harvest suppliers and Zespri in collusion with no transparency.Free Market....yeah right
If it ain't broke
Posted on 18-04-2011 13:17 | By cinik
Don't fix it
Bias
Posted on 18-04-2011 15:10 | By mr mizprint
A bias report about a bias survey. Turners commissioned the survey, they paid for it, they set the leading questions. Were the respondents aware that the countries outside NZ are in the northern hemisphere, they don't compete with NZ fruit & is a prudent move so Zespri can offer 12 month continuous supply for when NZ fruit are out of season. Many of the varieties Turners are offering are varieties already rejected by Zespri as inferior. A survey of the growers would be far more compelling as they have a much better understanding of the industry. And where was Zespri's right of reply. Come on Sunmedia you are so much better than this.
Other view
Posted on 18-04-2011 21:09 | By db
If they asked people in the kiwifruit industry the same question they would get a very different result.
Just Ask Yourself
Posted on 19-04-2011 10:26 | By Muz061
I find it hard to believe growers would want to jump to an economic model like that which pip-fruit growers are exploited. Diminishing returns with no profitability despite high supermarket prices and you can see why the great new hopes like "Jazz" have bombed spectacularly. The modern day Turners and Growers with their sharemarket aspirations are not part of the real NZ economy. I have no axe to grind as an observer of the produce market only, but Zespri like Fonterra seem to be giving their suppliers hope in a world that is severely damaged by speculators and crooks.
Eyes Open
Posted on 20-04-2011 11:16 | By kiwifruitgrower
Fonterra is a good model to quote, shares are based on production, diary farmers have the option to send their milk to a competitor if they wish. Nothing like Zespri at all! Zespri is not owned by all growers, only 70% of them. Talk about a biased survey, just ask a grower who was rung up for the NZKGI survey, what a load of biased questions! If Zespri is really so good T&G won't be a problem anyway, no growers will support them. Has 'Bias' ever seen or tasted an ENZA fruit? Obviously not. Turners fruit come from a different breeding program altogether. If growers want to believe the Zespri propaganda they can continue to be controlled by them, that is their choice, but some people can think for themselves.
freedom to choose is a right
Posted on 21-04-2011 10:10 | By lee hoggard
The facts are we live in this wonderfull free country and we have this ridiculous situation that one company has a government supported monopoly. these controls have been lifted in the free trading world every but here in nz.If all the growers truly believe that zespri is the best marketer for their fruit whats the problem with having some competition,every other industry does. the owners of plant variety rights should and will in the future have the right to grow and sell there fruit and the market will decide whether its good enough. these PVR,s are recognised world wide and nz is a signortary to that convention,I believe the green grower who is really strugling needs some more options and whats wrong with that
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.