The MetService is reporting there is little or no chance radioactive material released into the atmosphere from damaged Japanese nuclear power stations will reach New Zealand.
The National Radiation Laboratory (NRL) and MetService are advising that global atmospheric circulation patterns are effectively confining the spread of any radioactive material from Japan to the Northern Hemisphere.
The Friday, March 11 earthquake and tsunami in Japan has caused some radiation leaks from nuclear power plants. File picture.
There are now reports of nuclear material originating in Japan being detected in Alaska and North America, though at such low levels that they pose no hazard to human health.
Both NRL and MetService have received enquiries from the public about the impact of the Japanese nuclear emergency on New Zealand.
'NRL and international agencies are using existing monitoring sites to track the spread of any radioactivity, including air monitoring stations in New Zealand and other countries,” says NRL emergency response team leader Tony Cotterill.
NRL has access to data from the air monitoring stations of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organisation.
In New Zealand, there are stations at Kaitaia and the Chatham Islands.
Additionally, around the Pacific, there are stations in the Cook Islands, Fiji, Japan, Christmas Island, Wake Island, Midway Island, Hawaii, California, and Alaska.
Data is also available from an NRL/MetService station at Hokitika.
MetService chief forecaster Peter Kreft says monitoring this situation is important.
'It was important to understand that forecasting the airborne spread of radioactive material is a highly specialised field.
'Unless information about this comes from NRL, directly or through reputable media or channels, think twice about relying on that information.”
At the request of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the World Meteorological Organisation has activated its environmental emergency response mechanism. WMO's Regional Specialised Meteorological Centres in Asia (Beijing, Tokyo and Obninsk, Russian Federation) and Australia are closely monitoring the situation.



5 comments
No time for complacency
Posted on 23-03-2011 13:28 | By Writerman
We might escape the consequences of this, but this is a timely remoinder to us all why nuclear power is a stupid option. In fact it is a totally irresponsible option. I can't see a hell of a lot of difference between someone who builds a nuclear power plant and someone who builds a P lab. They are both a blight on society and put their fellow citizens in mortal danger. Continue to say NO to nukes.
Balanced?
Posted on 23-03-2011 16:22 | By Writerman
You are actually trying to tell us that O'Reilly Media is a 'balanced' source?
Reader Comment
Posted on 23-03-2011 16:25 | By The author of this comment has been removed.
Reader Comment: For a balanced view: http://www.dailyack.com/2011/03/radioactivity-measurement-in-japan.html
Hear hear
Posted on 23-03-2011 23:01 | By ronillian
A "Like" for Writerman's comments on teh stupidity of nuclear power. Nuclear power is neither safe nor clean. As I see it, the alternative is not just improved energy efficiency but also utilizing sustainable renewable energies AND "powering down"... reducing our consumption of energy.
Come off it
Posted on 24-03-2011 09:21 | By The author of this comment has been removed.
Nuclear power is no more risky than living on Earth with a 1,392,000 km fiery ball of hydrogen and helium within cat swing. It's a bad idea for anyone in the ring of fire, but history shows that nuclear power produces far fewer deaths per Twh than any other energy source.... scare-mongering (and hanging on the every word of tv news media) causes the confusion writerman suffers from.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.