The terrible tragedy in Christchurch is an example of a problem seldom considered by the ideology of urban centralization. The continual enlarging of cities in the name of efficiency and economy is a false premise. Bringing large populations together in large communities has very few advantages and many disadvantages.
20 large towns spread over the Canterbury plains would have their own infrastructure and be much less immune to disaster of any nature.
The additional advantages of reduced congestion, fewer social problems, a stable work force and lower cost of living are just a few issues to consider.
Norway, a country of similar size and population to NZ has a decentralization policy. As a result they enjoy a far higher standard of living, a more stable economy, very low crime and almost no crime or social issues.
The Christchurch tragedy is an opportunity to consider decentralization as a solution to various problems.
There will be many people in Christchurch who do not wish to live in their old area again – but would like to stay in Canterbury.
Maurice O'Reilly, Tauranga.


1 comment
I agree
Posted on 12-03-2011 12:00 | By The author of this comment has been removed.
I couldnt agree more maurice. Not to mention all the complaining about the price of houses and land - No wonder its so expensive - Thats what happens when things a RATIONED. There is TONS of land available for people to build on if only they were allowed. Blame the council and the city planners
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.