Report reveals damning figures

The poorest half of the world's population – around 3.5 billion people - is responsible for just 10 per cent of pollution, despite being the most threatened by catastrophic storms, droughts, and other severe weather shocks linked to climate change.

These are the findings of a new Oxfam report, released during the ongoing climate talks in Paris, which also shows the world's richest 10 per cent produce around half of all emissions.


Protests were held in Tauranga at the weekend protesting the need for better policies surrounding carbon emissions. Photo: File.

The Oxfam report "Extreme Carbon Inequality" provides new estimates of the lifestyle consumption emissions of rich and poor citizens in different countries.

While negotiators might be working to reach an agreement based on the total emissions produced by their respective countries, this analysis helps dispel the myth that citizens in rapidly developing countries are somehow mostly to blame for climate change.

While emissions are rising fastest in developing countries, much of this is for the production of goods consumed in other countries, meaning that the emissions associated with the lifestyle of the vast majority of their citizens are still far lower than their counterparts in developed countries.

Oxfam New Zealand's Executive Director, Rachael Le Mesurier, says: 'Climate change and economic inequality are inextricably linked and together pose one of the greatest challenges of the 21st century.

'Paris must be the start of building a more human economy for all - not just for the ‘haves', the richest and highest emitters, but also the ‘have-nots', the poorest people who are the least responsible for and most vulnerable to climate change, including our Pacific neighbours."

According to the New Zealand Ministry for the Environment, the average New Zealander produces 16.6 tonnes of CO2-equivalent per year, making us the fifth-worst polluters in the OECD.

To put that into perspective, the average Indian produces 1.7 tonnes of CO2 per year.

The report makes clear the extent of this inequality in emissions responsibility - globally, within and between countries.

'Rich, high emitters should be held accountable for their emissions, no matter where they live,” says Rachael.

'But it's easy to forget that rapidly developing economies are also home to the majority of the world's very poorest people and while they have to do their fair share, it is rich countries that should still lead the way.”

According to the report, the only people who benefit from the status quo and who stand to gain from a weak deal in Paris is a select group of billionaires, who have made many of their fortunes in the fossil fuel industry, she says.

5 comments

What a load of crap!

Posted on 03-12-2015 09:42 | By How about this view!

Using this sort of logic we could say that by removing 15% of our population we could close half of our prisons and many of our hospitals. I wonder if the populations of India and China are recognised in the figures? India is looking to vastly increase its coal extraction and use and Chinas' increased industrialisation is visible in its air quality. Do India and China only have a small percentage of the worlds poorest people?


Thanks for shining a light on the truth

Posted on 03-12-2015 12:49 | By Kiwidad

Hey "How about this view!" -- you should take a look at the report. (http://www.oxfam.org.nz/news/extreme-carbon-inequality) Yes India and China are included, and no, that is not at all the logic being used. The point is that the wealthiest people -- both within and between countries -- are responsible for the most pollution. It's obviously not saying to remove them from the population. It's saying they are the most responsible for making climate change worse, and the most able to cut the pollution they cause. It debunks the old argument that India & China are the problem. Actually, they are investing in and shifting to clean renewables much faster than rich countries...and a high percentage of "their" carbon emissions come from producing goods that countries like NZ are consuming. Time to take responsibility. Low carbon future for all? Bring it on...


To produce WASTE

Posted on 03-12-2015 13:23 | By Blessed

You need MONEY. To make products such as Plastic, Paper, Metal, Glass ect, you need money, the process of making all those products Produce Massive amounts of waste into our Air and water. Everyone should be refusing/reducing consumption. There is NO AWAY when you throw something away. All BOP waste excluding Rotorua goes to the Landfill in Te Aroha. When that landfill is Full, where is OUR waste going to go?? all your waste water gets pumped out to sea off Omanu, are you happy swimming in it? How often do you take a look at where your after product goes?? Clean up NZ! Know the process and damage production causes and YOU do something about it. REFUSE, REDUCE, REUSE.. PS WBOP no longer recycles plastic bags, only 1&2 plastics can e taken to Recycling centre. Changes start with you.


Kiwidad

Posted on 03-12-2015 15:12 | By How about this view!

The wealthiest people are generally those that are invested into employment. I know that there are some (Particularly those that favour the RED/GREEN movement) that are anti-wealth and wish to return to the good-old-days of bicycles and horse-drawn carriages, but progress is unstoppable. I wonder why we don't have a movement to invest in nuclear power, as this would reduce carbon emissions and "Global warming" from industry overnight as it's a "clean" energy source.


Nuclear waste

Posted on 03-12-2015 22:18 | By Blessed

comes with nuclear power. where in NZ are you going to store the drums of Nuclear waste? or are we planning on sending it to France because they have to take our Hazardous waste?


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.