Simon Bridges responds:

Along with restoring the right to go to Court, the Marine and Coastal Area Bill also allows parties to settle out of Court where the facts are clear. Where the outcome is not really in doubt, this will save expensive and time-consuming litigation.
The Crown does this all the time, for example in billion dollar tax litigation at the beginning of 2010. Any negotiations will be transparent and include local authorities and stakeholders.
The requirement of proving exclusive use and occupation since 1840 must be met whether a group seeks recognition of customary title through the courts or through negotiation.
There is more information about the Bill on the website http://www.beehive.govt.nz/feature/common-marine-and-coastal-area
Simon Bridges MP.

2 comments

STOP TRYING TO DEFEND THE INDEFENSIBLE

Posted on 15-01-2011 13:08 | By Ratcatcher

Sorry Simon you know it is not quite as simple as that.It will become a rort with the Crown rolling over in any negotiations and Iwi becoming increasingly avaricious and creative with their dubious claims.Nothing in the existing 2004 Act prevents claims being made to the High Court does it ? If the current position is retained there will not be any issues as has been the case for last 7years.Your reference to the multi billion tax litigation with the Banks is nebulous as the Crown were getting the $billions not giving it away for a start.


Just Listen

Posted on 19-01-2011 12:33 | By Chudleigh

Sorry Simon, at a party function before the election I warned you about parties and their MP's not listening to the people they purportedly represent.You listen only to the party line and have it seems no mind of your own. Your party did not listen to the people on the anti smacking petition,and now you are not listening to the people over the foreshore and seabed. This is 'How to lose an election 101' Be prepared to be a one term wonder Simon


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.