I refer to my previous letter to the editor of 19-11-2010, other letters to the editor in the last month or so have questioned the excess spending of TCC. There are a few obvious reasons come to mind for this, some examples are: -
1. Power provided to Council (paid by ratepayers 'bottomless” cheque book) has not been tendered out? In fact the previous Council voted not to upon advice from Council staff that 'we must” give it to the 'City Partner” suppler. The current supplier therefore remains unchallenged on price potentially costing millions to ratepayers.
2. Annual city road maintenance – there were a number of bids received ranging from about $760,000 to $1.1 million.
The contract was awarded to the highest bidder at around $1.1m (41% higher than the next bidder) as recommended by Council staff. The successful bidder just happened to be a City Partner, two other bidders were not. The Council staff justified the decision based on their internal assessment process of tenders received, then stated that 'they are City Partners … we have to give it to them”.
3. Arataki Community Centre – A design and build contract approved of by Councillors and given to a City Partner that was known to be about $500,000 over priced compared to other suppliers (already reported in the paper).
4. Southern sewerage pipeline – Lakes developer Grasshopper are correct in disputing the Council 'imposed” fees and more for some 1500 sections (directly add to section cost to families). The pipeline is out of date and expensive, why do they ignore that? MS Senior letter of 17/12/2010 is absolutely correct to call this a 'Faulkner ½ a billion dollar lemon”. How many City Partners will feed off that one for the next 3-4 years?
Council should produce the tape recordings of these meetings for the public to hear what really happened to approve these contracts and payments.
Ian Stevenson, Tauranga.
TCC responds:
As usual the allegations this correspondent makes are incorrect. Mr Stevenson is however welcome to appear in front of the Council in a public forum to present his case if he wishes to. Note: recordings of Council meetings and decisions are already available on line.


15 comments
WATER-GATE TAKE 2
Posted on 23-12-2010 14:37 | By The Master
Just to confirm number one and two above were decided in closed meetings, the decisions then made are NOT available online, if they were then the public and media would be able to attend the meeting and would be immediately aware of these decisions from the outset. Item two does not tell it all, this item occurred in 2007, Council staff in that closed meeting stated that very thing to justify who got tyhe contract. The then CEO was delegated the job to renew the contract next time around. The CEO has since then done that without a tender occurring. It is exactly for these reasons that I believe that Council should never have closed or secret meetings.
TRUTH REVEALED
Posted on 24-12-2010 17:53 | By The Master
Perhaps it is about time that offical-dom became "transparent" as the Local Government Act requires Councillor's and staff to be with money that they are spending that actually belongs to others.
TCC Rubbish Bins
Posted on 29-12-2010 07:31 | By Ratcatcher
The inane TCC response from some unidentified Council bureaucratic cretin probably one of those earning over $150000+ shows that any fiscal criticism is wasted on these spendthrifts.As it is not their money they couldn't care less about how much is spent, on what 'pie in the sky' it is spent or how overpriced the scheme is and whether it will even work.Fringe nutters & the sqawkers always get first crack at the shrinking TCC (RATEPAYERS) cake.
tantrums
Posted on 29-12-2010 19:11 | By The Master
Well as TECT owns a hunk of Trustpower and TECT keeps giving public moneys (really intended for "good purposes" like schools and so on) to more and more Council hair-brain schemes one can understand why Council staff are reluctant to even think about tendering the power supply. If they did then they may not get all there little toys and fun project any more. Tantrums would run rife after that.
TENDERING - POT HOLES EVERYWHERE
Posted on 29-12-2010 19:16 | By The Master
The tendering process is a shambles! To get a clear grip on how good it is take a look at the CV of the senior tech officer at the NZ naval base in Devonport. The tendering process in Council is no better, the tenders are "evaluated" by Council staff considering many factors, price is only one of course. I am sure that the process is clear and transparent especially when all parties regularly attend the "City Partner" parties, I am sure that clears the head well and truly in every respect.
NO TENDER ALLOWED
Posted on 30-12-2010 16:39 | By The Master
Since TECT came into being and Council infiltrated TECT's cheque book, it is not permitted to have a proper tender of the power bills COuncils.
ROAD RAGE !
Posted on 31-12-2010 10:57 | By The Master
Why would you pay 41% more for roading than the next tenderer? All of the tenderers can do the work, in fact if you looked at the successful tender of 2007 you would want to try someone ... anyone else. something is "MUFFED" up here ?
THE GUY GOT IT
Posted on 31-12-2010 10:59 | By The Master
But no one was listening .... Murray wanted to save $500,000 odd of ratepayers money, but they all wanted to stick with the Arataki builder/designer, that costs us all as the price is to high like most Council contracts.
S**T DONT RUN UP HILL !
Posted on 31-12-2010 11:27 | By TERMITE
The Mayor of Rotorua is going be the chairman of the Southern Sewer Pipeline Project? The pipeline goes north anyway ... did anyone tell them that it is not going to Rotorua (as far as the "Turkey's" know anyway).
SECRET MEETINGS
Posted on 31-12-2010 14:24 | By TERMITE
There can not be a recording of a meeting held behind closed doors? What is the point of meeting behind closed doors to talk about "SECRET" things then put the tape recording up on the internet. More old wives tales here if you ask me.
LEAVE US
Posted on 31-12-2010 14:31 | By TERMITE
The Southern Sewer Pipeline is a cossal waste of money and time, there are technologies that are some 20 years more up to date that that. This new technology is being used in Canada, even in third world countries in South America. There is no cost to Council to: operate it, build it, manage it, in fact the operators even pay a dividend to the Council. Best example is in Canada, the Council has US$ 500 million in the bank and dropping rates. What more do you want, of course all of this means less bureaucrats', bet that has got something to do with it. No brainer actually.
LEAVE THEM
Posted on 02-01-2011 12:19 | By The Master
No different to "The Wall"
SFO BETTER PLACE TO CONSIDER
Posted on 02-01-2011 13:39 | By The Master
Sounds like bad stuff going on there, perhaps with the amounts involved the best place for this to be properly considered is via the SFO at least teh information flow will not be as limited as the public by a long way then.
LEAKY SECURITY
Posted on 02-01-2011 20:08 | By TERMITE
Well we know also that the COuncil pays a lot of $$ for security around the town, but that has not been tendered in years also, word has it that it does not get past some bureaucrats desk, you just have to ask why and of course then there is the question of who.
ALL THE LITTLE BLEEDERS
Posted on 02-01-2011 20:11 | By TERMITE
Looks like not just leaky homes at anywhere from $3.8 million to a billion odd ... who knows, could be that this pales compared to the over priced sourcing of services and supplies, all looks to nice, warm and comfortable to me.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.