I would like to clarify the situation regarding the above, as the perception seems to be a little misleading.
The Council always ticketed unwarranted or unregistered vehicles, no matter how overdue. Vehicles overdue within four weeks (period of grace) had the opportunity to make the vehicle roadworthy within 14 days from the date of the ticket. If this happened the fine was waived. If not the fine applied. If the WOF or registration was more than four weeks overdue, there was no period of grace and the fine applied.
The amendment I proposed will follow exactly the same procedure but instead of a four week grace period there will now be eight weeks. This still gives the owner 14 days from the date of the ticket to make the vehicle roadworthy. If this is completed the fine is waived, if not the fine applies. If the WOF or registration is more than eight weeks overdue, there is no period of grace and the fine applies.
Some Councils in NZ ticket unregistered and unwarranted vehicles, and some do not.
Police support Councils that do, as this takes some pressure off police resources, but at a cost.
Fines paid are split 50% to the Government and 50% to your Council.
Therefore as Council has the power to issue these tickets, we should be firm but also fair towards the vehicle owner.
I am happy to be contacted by anyone wishing to discuss this further.
Cr Bill Grainger, Welcome Bay.


2 comments
Is it fair?
Posted on 04-01-2011 23:05 | By tibs
Is the Council Policy in line with the normal Police practice? Perhaps Cr Grainger will tell us? Also will they backdate the exemption to people previously ticketed in years gone by? After all, they could backdate this latest approach but I bet they wouldn't refund any previously paid fines. Methinks the Police and Council are too close. Why was it necessary for the of officer in charge of the Mount Police Station to have a six month secondment to Tga Council as a form of mid (life?) or career sabbatical and what did she actually do? Or is this really when the seeds were planted for the demise of the Sand Bar and also the tilt at Blues Brews and BBQs? This of course was the same person who recommended the establishment of a storage facility for beach goers to deposit their valuables in whilst they went for a swim. A local doctor went to a reasonable expense, built a trailer and employed staff, only until the service flopped.
SABBATICAL PAID x 2
Posted on 06-01-2011 12:28 | By TERMITE
A holiday at our expense x 2 and some. her prime function before hand was to attend to pedestrian crossing signs and supervision of the same. Her purpose of setting up shop at Council was a cover (stated as being to research the Strand drinking bylaws + Blues & BBQ thing) what her real purpose is was to covertly work with senior council staff and some Councillors to "create" sufficient evidence and information for electoral purposes.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.