Ban gang patches. Get dogs off beaches. Clear vagrants out of the city. They are easy calls to make for a city councillor looking for headlines and a photo opportunity, but acting on them can quickly bog councils down in wider issues.
Deputy Mayor Kelvin Clout's call for Tauranga City Council's policy on vagrants is being challenged by Councillor John Robson.
There are a number of people who choose to live on the streets, while others have nowhere else to go.
When Kelvin told the City Vision Committee meeting that he would look at Hamilton's vagrancy policy, John responded by saying: 'Is that the same policy that drives people out of the central city into the nearby suburbs? Is that a successful policy?”
A previous Tauranga City Council learned the downside of moving homeless people out of the city centre when the permanent downtown liquor bans were created.
It had the effect of driving the daytime drinkers to Cliff Rd and The Domain.
'Unless you put in place a comprehensive system for dealing with the vagrancy you can wind up with situation where they move from a retail area into another area and they can wind up being pushed into some inner city suburbs, that was the observation I was making,” says John.
'If you really want to address this issue it needs to be by working with social services and almost working in effect with your central government. You can't be in a situation of just deciding we are literally going to hose the streets to make sure no one sleeps there overnight.
'When you end up moving people who are homeless out of your city centre, they don't just vanish. So where do they go?”
Homelessness in New Zealand urban areas has become noticeable following the government decision to close large mental hospitals.
The institutions had their own issues, but so do the street sleepers of today, says John.
'There's a high level of illness among the homeless community, mental issues and substance abuse. And moving them on doesn't address the issues.”
The council needs to give some thought to what the solutions are and who can provide them. Central government will have to be involved, and while there is potentially a role for the councillors, they need to be sure they are not addressing issues outside their brief.
'Any significant social issue is not something a council can attack on its own.
'I suppose it's alright to identify the issue or to identify with someone who wants the issue addressed, but I think it behoves any councillor who wants to raise these issues to bring some sort of solution or proposal to the table, otherwise it can look like posturing.
'Whether it be dogs on a Papamoa beach or homeless people in the city centre there's no city councillor who's unaware of the odd incident, there's no city councillor who's unaware that there is an issue of some level that we would like to address,” says John.
'But before the topic gets a headline and their name and photo in the paper, it would be good to do some work.
'Particularly if at the same time you are saying I want to keep the rates down, and I want to manage this, and, and, and.
'The question is, what's the solution? And is the solution workable, sustainable, practical, – and does that solution line up with all the other things you say you are in favour of.
'Let's think things through and make considered contributions for complex debates. No knee jerk responses.”
9 comments
I
Posted on 07-04-2015 08:09 | By Capt_Kaveman
thought the shelter was to help in this area or has this shelter turned into a boarding house for what i see and is it against the whole idea of what it was for, John should know he is part of the foodbank and should be working with the homeless, there more to helping people with food but shelter is something a few dont have
To be there
Posted on 07-04-2015 08:34 | By YOGI BEAR
Some choose to be where they are, some have the means to do otherwise but choose not to. Many live a life on the street because there is no other option. many reasons for that but most relate to addition or simple a desire to be different and outside the normal life flow of people, house rent/mortgage etc.
Why are we not asking
Posted on 07-04-2015 08:47 | By How about this view!
The glaringly obvious question,"How can we improve institutions?" I have heard anecdotally of issues around admittance to medical help. We see reports of government funded "Institutions" closing valuable community resources to stay within budgets (Even police stations around the country now) and there can only be one reason. The "squeaky wheel" projects are sucking funds away from a caring community. watch your television News and ask yourself "Do we really NEED" a train set in Auckland? Government funded research at the Kermadec Islands? New bridges in Northland? A dog park? A museum? Multiple ART resources? Green-space within 500M of every residence? Or do we need to look after the ratepayers by building more residential care homes AND MORE PRISONS.
What - Nazi State
Posted on 07-04-2015 10:59 | By Surfwatch
Get dogs off beaches, Oh God what next. We take our little dogs on the beach every day. They are no trouble. We pick up after them every time, as do a lot of people. There are the odd people who leave their dogs business behind, catch them and fine them, but don't penalise everyone for the sake of a few. Incidentally those are probably the ones who would ingnore any council decree anyway.
Big no to dog ban!
Posted on 07-04-2015 11:43 | By Watch
If the councillor is thinking of banning dogs on the beach, I'm sure there would be a huge revolt. We live at Mt Maunganui and take our dogs daily to the beach. It's a big part of our life. We are responsible dog owners and always clean up like most with dogs here. Anyway I would rather step on the odd poo than walk on broken glass and pick up rubbish left by fisherman. I think my dogs would suffer greatly if they didn't get their daily beach walk fix.
A question to you both,
Posted on 08-04-2015 05:26 | By Jimmy Ehu
when is this debate going to be?, and are inner city residents going to be given a chance to voice their views on your social "do gooder" opinions before you set a "vagrant policy" as it sure as hell looks to me as usual you are all giving yourselves voices in the press with more thought being given to the "homeless" rather than the actual rate paying residents that have to deal with this issue daily!!, I for one stated when your "Motel for Vagrants", was opened your problems were only going to escalate, what we have now is an influx of other cities problems, Hamiltons issue being partially solved.(which their Councillors are self congratulating themselves about), is in part due to a large percentage moving here, why do you think your Motel is continuously overflowing?, open your chambers to a public debate, or just invite me!!!!,
Mount watch
Posted on 08-04-2015 06:53 | By maildrop
i doubt the dogs would be thinking about the good times on the beach if they were banned. They don't have the memory or intelligence for it. They're dogs. Dogs also don't avoid dog poo. A human being that doesn't mind stepping in dog poo must be displaying the same level of intelligence as a dog. Ban stupid people from the beach.
Missing the mark?
Posted on 08-04-2015 08:24 | By nerak
I think some comments have ignored the gist of the article. John said 'while there is potentially a role for the councillors, they need to be sure they are not addressing ISSUES OUTSIDE THEIR BRIEF”, and 'I think it behoves any councillor who wants to raise these issues to BRING SOME SORT OF SOLUTION OR PROPOSAL TO THE TABLE, otherwise it can look like posturing”. And 'But before the topic gets a headline and their name and photo in the paper, IT WOULD BE GOOD TO DO SOME WORK”. Lastly, 'no knee jerk responses”. How often in years gone by have we seen a councillor have a plethora of photo opportunities, very often for a small issue affecting half a dozen people? I don't think any of us ratepayers want to see that start again, it isn't good councillor practice. This is what we should be concerned about.
Maildrop
Posted on 08-04-2015 15:20 | By Watch
I think I may have hit a raw nerve there "Maildrop". Maybe you are a fisherman that doesn't bother to clean up.And a dog hater. Dogs do have intelligence and I know they don't like to stand in dog poo if they can help it. Ban ignorant people haha.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.