Clayton Mitchell along with Rusty Kane are deluded if they believe Mr Mitchell could do justice to being both a TCC City councillor along with being a New Zealand First MP.
Do neither of these gentlemen realise that MP's are in Wellington from Monday through to Thursday so how would Mr Mitchell be able to attend Council meeting and also enact other local duties expected of him?
Granted it is probably most likely that Mr Mitchell will have little or nothing to do, as an opposition MP especially taking into account that his leader seems to have control of everything and does not permit his MP's to speak or do anything independently.
From personal experience I found it extremely difficult holding down even a part-time job, when I was first elected to council, which eventually I had to give up as I soon realised that the important role of being involved in the city should not be a part-time one.
Just resign Mr Mitchell so that the city can then elect a ward councillor that actually wants to be a ward councillor and get on with city duties and represent the ratepayers of Tauranga.
M Baker, Bethlehem.


2 comments
Rusty Kane
Posted on 10-10-2014 14:37 | By Rusty Kane
In respect, Clayton doing both jobs would actually save the ratepayers $140,000 in the first year, his TCC wages and a by-election. He could also act as the Mayors adviser, helping council with central government legislation. When Mr Baker suggests Clayton can't do both jobs, he's wrong, and answers the question in part himself, by saying. "Granted it is probably most likely that Mr Mitchell will have little or nothing to do, as an opposition MP". Clayton himself said "with NZ First now on the cross benches, opposed to in power, the workload albeit considerable is not as large as first envisaged. Add this to what TCC Councillor Rick Curach said, saying he was honest when he admitted to working an average of 22 hours a week as a TCC councillor and then reminded us that 10 weeks of the year councillors do no business as councillors.
Sorry Rusty, you're grossly misled ande misleading!
Posted on 13-10-2014 10:05 | By Murray.Guy
Disappointing that for Rusty Kane, like many others I note, democracy and it's application is expendable if the price is right, even if his rational has next to no validity. Rusty Kane deliberately chooses to use the hours quoted by Cr. Curach, the lowest of the eleven elected representatives. The majority of Councillors advised the workload was 35 - 45 hours. Councillor Curach DID NOT say for 10 weeks of the year he did NO council business. He may have said that there are some weeks where NO formal TCC meetings are held (Xmas break, school holidays) but that excludes those meeting with external entities and individuals, regular daily community calls on a Councillors time.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.