The council surplus for the end of the 2013 financial year is firming up at $5.5 million, according to figures in the 11 month financial report received this week.
Tauranga City Council. Photo: file.
At the end of May the council operating surplus was $4.7 million, with other council revenue $4.3m above budget year to date.
Revenue from operations is $3.1m ahead of budget.
Interest on investments so far this year is $620,000 ahead of expectations and unbudgeted revenue of $300,000 has been received from TECT relating to the electricity account.
Within activities, major favourable variances in the year include building related revenue with $600,000 due to an increase in building activity, and transportation of $400,000, Route K and parking.
The full year result is brought down a little by some below budget returns.
Forestry harvesting revenue of $500,000 from water catchments will not be received until 14/15, offsetting favourable water by meter revenue of $300,000.
Library and Baycourt revenue is expected to be below budget by $300,000 because of overly optimistic revenue budgets.
The capital works budget is ahead of budget because some early payments have been received.
The full amount of NZTA contribution to Tara Road an additional $913,000 for the full year, and $230,000 for the new signals outside Tauranga Hospital, were not budgeted as revenue items for the current year.
The Port of Tauranga's $200,000 contribution to the Pilot Bay Boardwalk was also not budgeted. The full year projection also includes Regional Council funding of $1.8m toward the Southern Pipeline, which is invoiced in June.
Development contributions are expected to be on, or slightly above budget, at the end of the year. Vested revenue for the full year is expected to be below the full year budget due to lower activity.
The council's personnel costs are $1.25 million below budget due to delays in filling positions in the organisational structure. A $416,000 overspend in May is largely due to below budget capitalisation.
A review and correction of capitalisation for the year will be undertaken this month with year-end results expected to be closer to budget than indicated by the May result, says treasurer Mohan De Mel.
Some work required in HR systems has been slow to get underway and a carry forward may be requested. The variance relating to contractors and consultants costs covering vacancies is reflected in other expenses being over budget.
The less than budgeted capital spend is also causing financial costs to track below budget. Year to date, saving in finance cost is $1.2m. Full year finance cost is projected to be $1.1 m favourable variance.
Overall operating and maintenance costs are tracking favourably to budget due to below budget costs including electricity and chemical savings, says Mohan.
Consultants' costs are above budget as a result of consultants covering for staff vacancies. A write off of past years' capitalised salaries for the now completed STAR project accounts for $2.34m of above budget costs. This operating expenditure is funded by loans as per the revenue and financing policy and offsets the otherwise favourable result for other expenses.
The full year projection for net debt is below $370m, mainly due to low capital spend to budget.
Capital expenditure to the end of May is 51 per cent of full year budget. The projected year end result is 59 per cent of budget, which would require expenditure in June of $7m. This would result in an underspend of 2014 budget of $28m, of which $16m has been re-budgeted to 2014/15. The rest is identified as savings or works to be undertaken in a later time period.



11 comments
DUH!!!!!
Posted on 29-06-2014 10:13 | By Sambo Returns
what a complete load of waffle!!!!!, I do like the line though about unfilled positions, just goes to show the Council "spin doctors" do actually have a sense of humour, as if our overall debt is just below 400 million, how can you have a 5.5 million surplus?
It might be a surplus, but what about the debt?
Posted on 29-06-2014 11:04 | By Annalist
Seems to me that so-called surpluses are just money that was effectively going to be borrowed, but hasn't been spent. I'm disturbed to read that the Library and Baycourt revenues are expected to be several hundred thousand below budget. Does this mean ratepayers have to pick up the tab, and who is held accountable?
A Positive Spin . . .
Posted on 29-06-2014 13:47 | By The author of this comment has been removed.
I understood council was in debt to the tune of 100's of millions. How do we now have a surplus? P.S. I failed School cert accounting, so could someone clarify this "surplus" to me?
So..............
Posted on 29-06-2014 14:01 | By tonya
why the rates increase?
Overit
Posted on 29-06-2014 15:43 | By overit
Well That's the IT fixed and almost a new Greerton Library. Yay, if only it was that simple.
Accounting
Posted on 29-06-2014 15:54 | By FunandGames
For those who cant work it out, this means they spent less last year than they took in, so by doing this hopefully the debit will reduce
@big ted
Posted on 29-06-2014 16:30 | By Steve Morris
A surplus simply put is not spending in any given year more than you charge people e.g. spending $163.5m of a $168m budget. The government's debt is around $68 billion and under the current government's policies they will be in surplus (receiving more in tax than they spend) for the first time next year. @overit, Yes that's where the money for the IT decision by the previous council has come from and debt retirement. Greerton library is being funded by money collected from developers, not rates. Debt has flatlined this year and is some $14m less than budgeted by the previous council.
Well
Posted on 29-06-2014 17:29 | By Capt_Kaveman
then they should have looked at the books better and that 5.5M would have been our 4.7% flood levee
Surplus clarity
Posted on 29-06-2014 20:27 | By Murray.Guy
The figures quoted relate solely to budgeted income and expenditure for the past 12 months. TCC went out to the community with an expectation to carry out specific works, to incur specific costs and said to the community, this is how much we need in rates. Bit like sending the kid to the shops for a carton of milk, expecting it to be $4 but there is change of .50 cents. A surplus. Unlike the 'good kid' who comes home and returns the .5o cents, TCC will always try and spend it and or allocate to the following years budget to make it appear the rating requirement is less than it really is. TCC has a policy that the first $500,000 of any surplus automatically goes to reduce debt. The balance can be returned to ratepayers being used to subsidize for rate requirements or it could reduce debt!
Consultants
Posted on 30-06-2014 00:59 | By YOGI BEAR
Overspent by $2.34m, what about the rest of the consultants? There are plenty running around the place and no one seems to know how many.
@ Murray
Posted on 30-06-2014 11:29 | By YOGI BEAR
Like previously the surplus will vanish to a place unknown. The surplus must be returned to ratepayers (their money) by either reducing this years rate needs or reducing debt.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.