Details of the application made by the owners and insurers of the Rena to leave the remaining wreck on the reef will be provided at a media briefing on Monday.
The resource consent application was lodged with Bay of Plenty Regional Council on Friday, May 30, and is seeking to leave the sunken aft section of the ship currently in up to 50m deep water on the Astrolabe Reef.
Watch the videos below.
Spokesperson for the ship's owners, Hugo Shanahan, confirmed the application was made after a sonar survey undertaken after March's Cyclone Lusi showed the position of the ship's section had changed.
The remaining accommodation block section now lies in water 24m to 53m deep, beyond depths typically accessed by recreational divers.
TMC Marine Consultants advisor Roger King this week said the aft section's rotation on the stern means it is significantly weakened and presents a 'greater risk and technical challenge for ongoing salvage operations”.
'The movement has helped to expose container and cargo debris that was previously difficult to access within holds four and five,” says Roger.
'As a consequence, Resolve Salvage and Fire is reconfiguring its large RMG 1000 barge to resume operations to further reduce the debris field, which covers the area of seabed between the bow and aft sections, and alongside the wreck to a depth of about 30 metres.”
It's understood debris and parts of the ship weighing up to 10 tonnes will be removed.
This week Mayor Stuart Crosby told SunLive that although he recognises the efforts put in by salvors his concern is for the region's coastal environment and world-wide reputation.
'The Rena is clearly breaking up and I do understand their move not to remove the balance of the accommodation block.
'I really do have the upmost respect for the work the salvors have done from the start – but my concern is for the future and what will happen to the remnants of the Rena and the cargo, and some of the more hazardous material in and around the ship.”
'We have been made aware for some time the resource consent will be applied for, I haven't yet seen it.”
The Mayor says he is concerned about the scope of the decision makers and how far they can go in the decision making process.
'There are a lot of unanswered questions and hopefully they will be answered in a short period of time, in regards to the resource consent, and I encourage people to participate in that process.
'We understand it may be forwarded it onto the Environment Court and I support that.
'I have always viewed that it should be removed, but the point is what are we going to remove now? I haven't yet formed a view from the new information.”
The Regional Council is expected to publicly notify the consent, and a website is set up to provide information to the public on this.
The ship hit the reef, about 25km off the coast of Tauranga, on October 5, 2011 as it made its way to the Port of Tauranga.
It subsequently broke up spilling more than 350 tonnes of heavy fuel oil, along with containers of contents through the waters of the Bay of Plenty coast.
Since its grounding opinions have been divided on whether the ship should be entirely removed.
In October 2012 SunLive undertook a street poll asking people's opinions on whether the wreck should be removed from the reef or allowed to stay.
It seems in the last two years opinions have changed.
Watch this week's poll below:
October 5, 2012, video below:



6 comments
Remove the Rena
Posted on 07-06-2014 14:06 | By Buddy Mikaere
Interesting split in opinion with young people apparently favouring complete removal. The failure to remove the wreck in the first place means that it has now broken up even further putting it beyond normal recreational diving depths. The debris field around the wreck has meanwhile been increased in size. Arguments that removal will further damage the reef are suspect too given the damage caused by the ship breaking up. Removal will not cost NZ anything as it will be paid for by the insurers. As far as safety is concerned - put the job up for tender. I betcha NO salvage company is going to refuse to tender on the grounds its dangerous - it just means the work will have to proceed much more carefully and slowly and therefore is sure to be a more expensive job for the insurers. Leaving it is all about the $$$.
Remove
Posted on 07-06-2014 20:28 | By Raewyn
I know people who have been working out there and if the wreck and all the tons of wire-rope etc are not removed it will never be safe for any Divers! Also the movement of the debri and remaining hull are moving with the tides causing more destruction to the reef! Take it all away I say with no cost to New Zealanders it does not belong in our waters!
Theodorus
Posted on 07-06-2014 20:56 | By Theodorus
It is not impossible to remove the lot it will only cost the insurers more money.there is still a lot of cargo in it that will contaminate our coastal area for a very very long time which will be a disaster for a lot of things so the the best thing is to remove it all!The insurers should and have the money to pay for it!
To Stay or Go?
Posted on 08-06-2014 15:27 | By Mary Faith
The ball will be in the court of the Regional BOP Council as to whether the wreck stays or goes. The Insurers will spend millions of dollars to hire consultants and spin doctors in every field to offer placating reasons as to why the wreck should stay. They won't let anyone near the wreck to see what is really going on. Do we think a few million dollars here and there might seal the deal in their favour??
Okay to put safety first at Pike River Mine ..
Posted on 08-06-2014 18:40 | By Murray.Guy
Buddy says to hell with any safety concerns. Put the removal up for tender and somebody will tackle the job regardless of the risk if the money is enough! I wonder if he made the same cry in regard 'Pike River' and recovery efforts? As for risk to our environment, it pales into insignificance to that which we (as in all of us) are contributing to on land, not to mentions lives needlessly lost, children killed. Oh, that's right, people are expendable!
Amazing Rubbish
Posted on 10-06-2014 14:20 | By Jitter
I heard Buddy Mikaere on radio talkback this morning. He stated that "The Government had made secret deals with Rena's owners and insurers" 1.Does he expect "Maori" to be consulted in every decision Government makes ? 2.He then said "He knows what is in these secret agreements !" 3.If that is correct they ain't very secret. 4. What about all the secret agreements successive governments over the years have made with "Maori" and the Maori Party ??? 5.Why should Government include 14.9% of the population only in it's agreements and decision making ? 6.Why not also include Asians 10% and Pacifica 10% and the 65% of Europeans and others ? Come on Buddy there are a few more people than "Maori" in NZ. We should all be consulted as NZers.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.