The current Asset Sales referendum asks if people support the Government selling some assets. Of course many people will say no.
But ask another question: Now the Government has sold the assets (the money to be used to build schools etc), should an incoming government buy the assets back and borrow money (from international lenders) to build the schools etc?
Turns out most people I ask say: 'No, don't borrow more”. So what does this say about their original No vote then?
Is it possible the first response is based on emotion, but the second based on logic?
B Ingram, Papamoa.


2 comments
Baiting by National
Posted on 06-12-2013 14:20 | By ronillian
This government's taunts in parliament are more typical of a playground than our national leaders. They are clearly not interested in intelligent debate nor listening to what the people of NZ want. They've claimed their mandate whatever the public says. If they continue to ignore public opinion they do so at their own peril. Many who voted National at the last election do NOT specifically endorse this asset sales program.
Not commonsense
Posted on 09-12-2013 08:23 | By Anbob
To sell your biggest income producing assets to build non-income producing assets that cost more to run does not make sense. What do you use to pay off debt when your income has been reduced.It is equivalent to selling the family farm to pay off debt then having nothing left to live off. At best it is a short term fix which can only result in increased hardship in the future.I am starting to think that maybe they(Nat's) are selling the assets just to look after their mates, which is starting to be the common theme(or at least result) of most of their policy.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.