9:34:58 Thursday 21 August 2025

Snapper limit cut, size upped

Snapper bag limits for recreational fishers are reduced from nine to seven per day and the minimum size is raised from 27- 30cm, announced Primary Industries Minister Nathan Guy today.

The changes will come into effect on April 1, 2014.


Nathan avoids upsetting the powerful commercial fishing lobby by at the same time increasing the total allowable catch in Snapper Area 1 from 7550 tonnes per year to 8050 tonnes per year.

The extra 500 tonnes is allocated to recreational fishers with a commercial allocation of 4550 tonnes and 3050 for the recreational sector.

'The scientific advice from the Ministry for Primary Industries suggests the Snapper 1 fishery can handle an increase of 500 tonnes and still continue the rebuild,” says Nathan.

'This is a balanced and fair package which will ultimately mean more fish for everyone in the coming years. Because the recreational sector has been catching well above the set allowance in recent years, short term management changes are required.

'This is New Zealand's most valuable inshore fishery. It is highly valued by all users, and I do not believe the current allocation of the TAC reasonably reflects the importance of the fishery to recreational fishers. As the stock increases in size I intend to increase the recreational share from the current 64:36 share to 50:50.”

'A clear message from submissions is that we need to do more to monitor the commercial catch and prevent unlawful behaviour. Therefore I am also introducing a comprehensive package to improve our monitoring and stamp out any illegal dumping.”

The measures include cameras or observer coverage on 25 per cent of all trawl vessels by 1 December 2013, with 100 per cent coverage by October 1, 2015.

Trialling the use of cameras to record and measure fish returned to the sea. Mandatory Vessel Monitoring Systems (VMS) on all commercial vessels by October 1, 2014.

Introducing a 'move on rule”, where commercial fishers will move from fishing spots where a significant portion of catch is small juvenile fish.

Implement a scientific tagging survey by October 1, 2014 to provide up to date and reliable information on the Snapper 1 stock. This will come with a cost of $7million and will be split 50/50 between the government and the commercial sector.

Require commercial fishers to report all catch under the commercial legal size by 1 April 2014.

Introducing a maximum size limit for commercial long line fishers. This will reduce commercial catch of large snapper. In general, large snapper are too big for market, but are important to the recreational sector.

Establishing a Management Strategy Group by the end of 2013 to develop long term plans for this fishery, involving both recreational and commercial representatives.

'The aim of these measures is to ensure we have a healthy, sustainable stock that will provide for our children and grandchildren,” says Nathan.

'The vast majority of submissions received agree with the principle of rebuilding this stock and sharing this fairly on both recreational and commercial sectors. These changes achieve that.”

More information is available at www.mpi.govt.nz

10 comments

Not a clue Guy!

Posted on 17-09-2013 16:32 | By yikes61

Guy was instructed by Key to look after big business so they get to continue catching tiddlers (25cm) AND more fish whilst recreational fishers get less (good) and have to catch bigger (30cm)? I dont believe that these measures will "ensure we have a healthy sustainable stock" Guy. No doubt Guy who has a similar uncanny smug expression as Bridges, will get slapped on the back by the National gutless wonders.


Gutless pratt

Posted on 17-09-2013 16:49 | By What?

The fishery is in trouble, so we up the total catch to placate the commercial lobby! On the bright side, recreational fishers have a much bigger vote than the commercial boys. Roll on the election...


commercial min. size

Posted on 17-09-2013 16:54 | By hapukafin

the fish stock wont grow nor will recreational fishers get their catch if the commercial min. size isnt the same at 30cm


For the truth...

Posted on 17-09-2013 17:07 | By yikes61

and more balanced result this decision will have, the Environmental Defence Society have a press release that can be read at : http://www.eds.org.nz/content/documents/pressreleases/130917%20SNA1%20decision.pdf


I trust nobody..

Posted on 17-09-2013 17:36 | By penguin

I don't believe a word of ANY national government MP's - they are all as wriggly and supercilious as each other!!


capitalism!!!!

Posted on 17-09-2013 17:43 | By Sambo Returns

yep this is nonsense, but who employs the people too pay the taxes, its a big industry and a big earner for this country, but no way should recreational fisher people be disadvantaged, so the line has been drawn by National, but you also have to remember which political party drove our country to the brink, so now we have to take one for the team, to get us back into a different colour than red.


Doesn't matter thanks to Nick Smiths diswashing liquid Corexit 9500

Posted on 17-09-2013 20:15 | By marcus

Since they poured at least 1800 Lt of this poison near our coast and beaches not sure if any of it is safe even our local fish. The Environment Misister said it was no more harmfull than "dishwashing liquid", as we have now seen the results of this poison in other areas of the world on 60 minutes it shows what a discrace NZ is to allow this to happen in our so called clean green back yard!


Theodorus

Posted on 17-09-2013 23:37 | By Theodorus

It seems very strange to be surrounded all around by so much sea and water and so little fish! What's up?


Overit

Posted on 18-09-2013 10:44 | By overit

Forget the recreational fisher John. Look at the Commercial guys who rape and pillage.


What a shocker!

Posted on 18-09-2013 12:00 | By Anbob

No commercial quota cuts, commercial size limit still 25cm, still allowing wasteful bulk harvest methods(main culprits of dumping). This exercise was never about conserving the fishery. It was about preserving and enhancing the industry's share. If the stocks were in danger why would he increase the TAC by 500 ton. Because he knows the recreational's will not be able to catch it!. Faulty decision, made on faulty data, by a faulty Minister! We also need an independent inquiry into MPI's impartiality.Lost my vote!


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.