Recently, it was again brought to my attention the low Land Valuation (LV) of a beachfront lease. Calculations I have taken from Tauranga City Council's rates website show the Papamoa Beachfront Camp LV is a mere $72 m2 compared to the non-Beachfront Papamoa Christian Camp at $101 m2 and another similar at $103 m2.
Wow, what a big difference and why?
Surely, beachfront used for business purposes should have a higher value for lease and rates to non-beachfront, regardless of area? Rates and lease terms are normally based on LV - so are other council ratepayers getting a fair go ? Has Tauranga City Council's CEO, staff, ever lodged an objection to such a low LV? Perhaps it time for an audit or commissioner?
I trust in the lease renewal that council will obtain at least three independent valuations, with at least one by an out-of-district valuer, so that ratepayers can be assured of a fair deal.
I'm sure ratepayers will agree that any council lands, reserves or property used for business purposes should be treated on an open playing field to rates and lease of private freehold lands.

Francis Bill Jackson, Te Puke.