Snapper levels in the Bay of Plenty are reduced to fishery collapse levels but nothing is being done about it, says Legasea advisor Trish Rea.
Legasea is a population-based advocacy group concerned with keeping fish stocks at a sustainable level for future generations.
The Bay of Plenty snapper fishery is at six per cent of original levels.
Trish's complaint follows a recently released Ministry of Primary Industries' assessment of the Snapper 1 fishery covering the Hauraki Gulf, eastern Northland and the Bay of Plenty which found stocks are well below the target level.
In particular Bay of Plenty snapper are below the 10 per cent ‘hard limit' of the natural biomass.
Primary Industries Minister Nathan Guy says a formal consultation process to discuss changes to regulations in the Snapper 1 area will begin next month. Until then, no decision will be made.
But Trish says something needs to be done now and suggests temporarily closing the fishery.
'It is considered collapsed and something needs to be done quickly, including closing the fishery.”
Trish believes the Bay of Plenty snapper estimates were merged with the other regions to disguise the seriousness of the situation and prevent the public need for strong action.
'They obviously didn't want to do that (close the fishery), so the ‘science' estimates for the Bay of Plenty have been amalgamated with the Hauraki Gulf, and now we come out with a happy little figure that is still not very good – but doesn't look as ugly as it did.”
The problem is compounded by tagging information showing juvenile snapper spawned in the Bay of Plenty, move to the Hauraki Gulf, she says.
'For snapper there's something really attractive about the Hauraki Gulf,” says Trish. 'It could be that the fish are moving out of the Bay of Plenty and into the Hauraki Gulf and that's why the Hauraki Gulf has got so many snapper.
'It seems to be the opposite of what happens to kahawai. The Bay of Plenty for kahawai is something we call a sink hole, all the kahawai really want to go there. They get smashed up by the purse seiners there, but they still go there.”
Trish says the Bay of Plenty region should be managed higher than everywhere else to make sure there's enough fish to catch.
'In an ideal world the Bay of Plenty is leaking fish all over the place, we need to manage it higher.
'But because Snapper 1 is one management stock, it's very hard to get effective management, even at a sub stock level.”
President of the Mount Sport Fishing Club Steve Penn says if recreational fishers must face quota cuts, so should commercial fishers.
'We come first, that's the Act,” says Steve. 'The minister first has to take into consideration the needs of Maori, and recreational fishers before setting the TACC (total allowable commercial catch).
'It's got us very concerned. It is a draft submission, but we anticipate the minister would be looking at slashing our recreational bag limits. We don't know to what extent, but we would be very concerned if he made any at all without putting up the evidence that the depletion is warranted.
'We would also be interested in making sure that he does it balanced, in other words, commercial also have to take a major cut.”
The Bay of Plenty has its own snapper nurseries and breeding populations and should not be locked in with the Auckland zone, says Steve.
'We should be looked at differently, treated differently. It could turn out to be to our detriment, we could be worse – or it could turn out that we are better. But it would be fair.
'We could then say we are not being judged by the overall effect on zone one, which doesn't really apply to us.”
Bay of Plenty snapper are under fishing pressure from an estimated 80,000 recreational fishers that come to the Western Bay from the Waikato and towns like Tokoroa, Cambridge Matamata, and Rotorua.
'That puts a lot of pressure on the Bay itself,” says Steve.
'We are always watching, guarding jealously our bag limits. We don't believe it should be oppressive. It should be fair all round.
'We're just a little bit worried by recent happenings where ministers have not been properly informed by their ministries. We would hate to see that happen again.”
The MPI data showed snapper numbers in Snapper 1 have increased by up to 70 per cent during the last 15-25 years, but are still only at about half of the level of their management target.
Current snapper stocks in the Hauraki Gulf and Eastern Northland are well below target. They are 24 per cent of natural biomass, below the agreed target of 40 per cent. The Bay of Plenty fishery is at six per cent of original levels.
The stock levels report will form the basis for management of the fishery from October 1. Nathan says options available include reducing bag limits and increasing minimum size for the recreational sector and reducing the commercial catch and stronger monitoring of commercial activities.
The Fisheries Act requires the MPI take steps to lift diminished stocks to a level to ensure long-term availability for future generations and ecosystem health.
Snapper 1 provides 70 per cent of the total commercial snapper catch and earns about $26 million in exports.
The commercial catch was lowered to 4500 tonnes in 1997 and bag and "legal size" limits were toughened for weekend fishers so the fishery could rebuild.
The recreational limit is nine fish, more than 27cm long.



13 comments
Ridiculous
Posted on 18-06-2013 10:34 | By Clover
Its not bag limits that need to be changed. Show me a recreational fisher that takes their limit every time they go fishing. They don't, its bollocks! It's the commercial catches that should be stopped for a few years. Why put an unnecessary ban on individuals trying to put food on the table for their families?? The commercial fisherman are used to fighting battles and do it very well….is that the reason Mr Guy doesn't want to go down that path?? Get some balls Nathan Guy and do the right thing by the people and freeze the commercial limits for a few of years.
dumping
Posted on 18-06-2013 11:00 | By hapukafin
who is guilty of grading and dumping?they are the ones that should have their limit cut ,not the recreational guys that is feeding their family
snapper assessment
Posted on 18-06-2013 11:37 | By tmc
What's actually said in the MPI assessment reads a bit different to what's being put out the "we're all doomed" merchants. i.e. East Northland, Hauraki Gulf and Bay of Plenty snapper: While these stocks have increased by up to 70% over the last 15-25 years, they are still only at about half of the level of their current management target. Recent numbers of young fish coming into the population - known as recruitment - have been above average. Five-year projections indicate all three stocks will increase slowly at current catch levels if good recruitment continues." The assessment is a fairly quick and easy read: Hoki, South Island Ling and Hake, Orange Roughy[they've found a new spawning area],are now well above ealier management targets. Southland Blue Cod and East Coast North Is scampi are well above management levels. And there is a " marked increase in recruitment of North of the South Is snapper since 2007, and this has led to a large increase in catch rates in the last 2 years". So where's the evidence of radical overfishing? On what's presented by MPI there's a better argument for saying that due to a change in weather patterns over the last few years the snapper are now breeding more in a different area to previously. Amazing. Does this mean that fish can actually move from one area to another quite a long way away if weather patterns change, sea temps and conditions, currents in particular, for them. Whoda thunk it. And maybe that's why you tend to catch them in shallower water sometimes, and deeper water at others, depending on time of year, prevailing currents, water temperatures, food in the water [krill, plankton etc]. Possibly why there's more marlin and skippies around in summer than winter and some years are better than others even. So, to reiterate, just where is the problem?
.
Posted on 18-06-2013 12:24 | By tuna33
licensing every recreational vessel then a fair objective approach better info less tunnel vision may be a better way to move forward without the emotion that comes with us all being kiwis
Raise the size limit
Posted on 18-06-2013 12:27 | By Getreal
I totally agree with Clover and hapukafin, it isn't the recreational fishers to blame - why not look at the commercial fishers taking huge amounts of fish, many undersized and dumping them? Another idea to help raise fish stocks would be to up the size limit, who in their right mind takes home baby 27cm snapper anyway?
Common sense
Posted on 18-06-2013 13:34 | By yikes61
National government put economic value of fisheries above the oceans environmental value. what have they done to protect Maui's dolphin on the West coast of the North Island from commercial fishers? In the last 10 years numbers have halved to 55. Its not a god given right of commercial outfits to strip the ocean now for profit. Look at overfishing of North atlantic cod stocks for example resulting in a collapse of stock and the local fishing industry. Recreational fishers also have to acknowledge that stocks are not sustainable at present take levels, NZs population is growing and todays children want to take their children fishing tomorrow. Less greed, me, me, me and more thought about tomorrow
Simple options
Posted on 18-06-2013 14:44 | By Poseidon
Ok lets asume the numbers are right then we all have a problem. The solution is pretty obvious and that is reduce the catch for all, what about 33% across the board for both Recreational and Commercial fishers 33% of the total quota. 27cm is a rediculous size limit lets increase it to 35cm again for all parties not just the recreational fisher. Review the stocks in 3 years and modify the rules to suit the situation again.
mmmm
Posted on 18-06-2013 17:03 | By RichieR
last summer the family was camping at Coromandel and a trawler came past the beach and dumped thousands of snapper that were well over sized and undersized. They has to much on board than there quota allowed so they dumped them. Everyone at the camp took many of these and still there was a carpet of fish laying dying on the beach...about time we started looking at these commercial fishers and did something, should not be in that close either where they were trawling. there is not enough people out there checking on the cheeky so and so's
Commercial nets are bad
Posted on 18-06-2013 17:13 | By m and ms
Spend some time on the beach after dark, between 10 and 4 on the beach fishing, and you will see large fishing boats within a km of shore. There purpose is to corner as many fish as close to home as possible when they hope no ones looking. When you ask nobody know anything. A no commercial zone from Whangamatas Slipper, Kawera, Motiti to Moutohora Islands at Whakatane would give a buffer and breading area.
Snapper levels
Posted on 18-06-2013 17:23 | By maunganui
We could follow the example of the Aussies in South Australia, they close snapper fishing for the whole month of August while the snapper are spawning. Any commercial or recreational fisher caught with a snapper in that month is instant fined, on the spot of $100.00 per fish.No if's, buts or any other excuse $100.00 per fish.
Common sense
Posted on 18-06-2013 19:11 | By Roger
Totally agree with clover ,recreational fishers don't always catch there limits commercial fishermen do and dump there not so valuable leftovers its nonsense
More bait than fish overboard
Posted on 18-06-2013 20:31 | By debarthowz
As a kayak fisher in Tauranga harbour I have thrown more bait in the water than I have retreived as snapper. I have also thrown back more young snapper (under 30 cm ) than I have taken home. Changing the bag limit will not limit my poor catch. Even when I brave the breakers and fish off Papamoa beach in 20 metres of water I don't get my limit. I STRONGLY think the commercial boats should be moved further off shore. Recreational fishing is also a commercial enterprise for our tourist ventures and sports stores and so should be supported to keep our local economy vibrant. I currently travel to the Coromandel to fish from my kayak, so that's a loss to our local economy.
Roger
Posted on 19-06-2013 18:33 | By Roger
I'd like to know the ratio of legal size and undersized snapper caught by commercial fishermen . I,ll bet they throw more back in the sea dead than what they keep.As a recreational fisher I would put back 99% of undersized fish back in the water alive and like most fisho,s seldom keep any snapper under 350mm. Commercial fishing is nowhere near as selective and far more destructive.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.