Letter lacks credence

Dr Graham Cliff in his letter of May 31 firmly places his support behind the anti Maori, anti treaty propagandists in their extreme right political party. His letter like their stated policies lacks credence.
His first mistake is in the use of the word reality in order to denigrate Maori. In human relationships, debate or argument there is no such thing as reality. It is subjective and therefore varies from one person or group to another.
He goes on to claim that Maori use empty rhetoric, outright lies or spirituality to gain advantage. The first two are easily dealt with, both sides in this debate of such practice, but by sheer volume alone the group he stands with are the worst offenders. Considered denial, is the biggest lie of all.
Doctor, you have absolutely no understanding of Maori spirituality, and its significance in their culture and practice. Your ignorance, insults and bullying rhetoric do you nor your race any credit whatsoever, and are a classic example of the negative propaganda 'Twisting the Treaty” is full of.
Finally you and your friends appear to believe that Maori owe you an eternal debt of gratitude. Why so? If the Brits hadn't colonized New Zealand no doubt the French would have, hence the subterfuge of the treaty. It is not true to say Maori are better for that process, certainly not in a spiritual sense.
'Pull back the curtains Doctor.” To dishonour a Treaty undertaken in good faith is the worst kind of dishonesty.

Robin Bell, Omanawa.

5 comments

Skye

Posted on 07-06-2013 13:45 | By Susan

Well said!


Bell's dishonour

Posted on 08-06-2013 12:09 | By Mike Kuipers von Lande

Bell states that dishonouring a treaty made in good faith is the worst kind of dishonesty. Well yes, this along with the fraudulent rewriting of history. Tribal Maori and their cronies are guilty of both offences to an incredible degree. Add to this the dishonesty of dressing it up under the term 'spirituality' and it is no wonder that more and more people are waking up to the terrible effects and consequences of the tribal Maori deceit foisted upon the generous and naive public over the last 40 years


Sacre Bleu

Posted on 08-06-2013 12:48 | By crazyhorse

Bell also states the French could have colonised NZ, this was another reason maori, (NOT) the English wanted a treaty to protect them from each other and the French,if it was not for the Poms i doubt we would be discussing this as there would not be any maori left.


Robin

Posted on 08-06-2013 13:18 | By Plonker

Twisting the Treaty is sadly just the truth of it, if that then is seen as propaganda or what ever then that most likely results from "The facts getting in the way of a good story and feasting at the Waitangi Tribunal".


DEBATE

Posted on 08-06-2013 21:31 | By crazyhorse

This could be all cleared up in a public debate between the likes of Orange, Salmon, and Paul Moon against John Ansell, David Round, John Robinson, Mike Butler, Martin Doutre and martin Devlin, but as i have said on a boring amount of times they will not, why, because they lie.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.